this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
1721 points (97.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26909 readers
2546 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

A thousand times this.

I've used this argument before arguing with hippies about "integrating with nature".

Any society that isn't on track to developing the science and engineering necessary for interstellar tavel is a dead end.

It's a tragic waste of human intelligence to keep making the same bamboo huts indefinetly.

So some noble savage can live their lives on repeat for hundreds or millenia, and that's somehow better than inventing an arc that can save every form of life on this unique Planet?

Bloody stupid hippy nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What makes life on another planet more worthwhile than life here? Also humans didn't take that long to evolve so there's plenty of opportunity for a successor to us to reach the stars in a way that causes less suffering. For that matter, we could have simply taken a couple hundred extra years to get there and reduced human suffering by like a thousandfold with a more equitable society. Bloody stupid capitalist nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

there’s plenty of opportunity for a successor to us to reach the stars

No, there isn't. We've already used up all the easily accessible sources of fossil fuels, so whoever comes after us won't have the energy sources necessary to have an industrial revolution and will be stuck at a pre-industrial tech level forever.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Great! So they'll skip the fossil energy era and jump directly to renewables? We paved the path for them to avoiding another climate change.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We're having quite a bit of trouble making that transition even with the benefits of a couple centuries of fossil-fueled industry. I find the idea of jumping directly from horse-drawn wagons to wind turbines and solar panels rather implausible.

[–] SimplePhysics 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That’s right, if we kick the bucket, a new intelligent civilization would not have the resources to advance at our pace. They may figure out the atom, but they won’t have the resources to utilize their knowledge. Then there is the ever looming threat of a disaster, and these preindustrial civilizations will be wiped out with zero warning or preparation.

Also: what are the chances a species similar to us in intelligence will emerge again on this rock? I’m going to bet it’s pretty darn tiny.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You guys make some giant assumptions....

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Feel free to name one or two examples and show how and why they're incorrect.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Write for me 4000 words on how technological advancement is a linear progression that always follows the same path and needs the same exact external stimuli to occur.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

4000 words? Oh please, that can be done in a hundredth of that: The laws of physics are constant, and more advanced technologies have energy requirements that must be met by preceding technologies. At the same time, each technology also has to offer enough tangible benefits to be worth pursuing on its own.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Sorry, that is not what I asked for. The fact you won't do it means you're wrong.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Feel free to make up the difference by rereading those two sentences a hundred times. Maybe that'll be enough for the point to get through.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are the extent of your creativity and imagination, aren't they.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I take it you have nothing else relevant to add to the topic. Cool. See you around.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

What makes them 'savage'?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We're not going to make it until the sun swallows the earth. If there's anything related to us left at that point then it wouldn't be recognisable to us.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

But if they're coming directly from us, what's the difference

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Amen, all those movies where "All tech stops working, people learn to do things for themselves! Utopia acheived!" are garbage

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

As individuals, a lot of people are content to live a simple life of prosperity. They have a basic job, and a small family, and some basic luxuries - and they call it enough. Some people have a one-eyed focus on increasing their wealth throughout their lives; but not everyone is like that. People generally recognise that their lives are finite. Some try to aim for some kind of imaginary high-score in their life, and others just live a 'normal' life.

I'm now making an analogy. As a species, we can recognise that are time is finite; and we can choose to live that out in a stable simple prosperity, where we just look after our world (house) and get what we need for some basic luxuries, and be content. We could have a billion years of that. It's a very long time. Or... we could aim for endless growth. We could consume as much as possible, and always aim for more. As we run out of resources and livable habitat on Earth, we must look to interstellar travel and spread to other planets. I don't necessarily think that is a better choice.

When I was young, I use to think that humans needed to settle on other planets. But I don't think that any more. Partially because I learnt about special relativity, and decided that unless we're very very wrong about science so far, having connected colonies on other planets is not possible. But also because I realised that there is no intrinsic goal to spread human life as much as possible. There are other things of value. We don't need that particular goal. I also use to think that personal immortality would be a good thing. I don't really think that any more.