this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
200 points (89.7% liked)

sh.itjust.works Main Community

7737 readers
1 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

Matrix

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If so, was it polled somewhere?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] emergencyfood 41 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Rowdy and very active left-leaning instance which recently rejoined the rest of lemmy. They tend to be very vocal in calling out racism, sexism, homophobia and other forms of bigotry, which has made certain users very angry. On the other hand, some of them seem to be very tolerant of certain authoritarian countries, which makes a certain other group of users very uncomfortable.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Left leaning? Every post I saw from them before finally filtering the instance was heavily right leaning and filled with everything you just claimed they are against.

[–] Kecessa 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The left right thing sometimes feel more like a circle and if center was at one end of the circle then tankies and the alt-right would be at the other end pretty to close to one another. They both want to own the people that are closer to center, they both have a love affair with Russia, they both deny genocides, they both believe in authoritarianism...

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yup, horseshoe theory. At a certain point, it's hard to tell authoritarians apart. I.e. why do you hate LGBT folks?

  • Stalin - they're non-conformist, so to the Gulag with with!
  • Hitler - the people don't like them, so we can blame them for our problems

Different justifications, same net result. So on LGBT issues, I can't tell Stalin and Hitler apart. The same goes for a surprising number of other policies.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

they both have a love affair with Russia

Yes, it's Kremlin/CCP propaganda. Both use social media to divide democracies. Divide and conquer on social media.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Left wing as in socially and econimically. Not sure what you mean by right wing.

They're communists, are very trans friendly, and deny genocide.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they're communists

No they're not. They're damaging to socialist causes if anything.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Communists are often damaging to socialist causes.

[–] lesbiankirby 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you have any links to prove this right leaning behavior?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No, because I filtered the entire instance after the 4th "OwN duh LiBs" post.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They consider liberals too right wing, that's why they want to own them iirc

[–] winterayars 6 points 1 year ago

This is correct. They're way too the left of US liberals and are generally sick of the domination US liberals have in US politics. (The same can be said of the UK.)

FWIW i'm mostly with them on this. I'm an anarchist and also far left, though i didn't join their instance when i came to lemmy (obviously).

[–] Zirconium 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unlike all those right wing LIBERALS. We do our own things. Denying genocide

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

As in it never happened? Because I've got a bridge for sale if so.

[–] lesbiankirby 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well can you at least explain what was right wing about what you saw?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bros unironically don't think liberals are right wing. What do you think they'll have to say? Right wing is when you shout "Death to Israel?"

[–] lesbiankirby 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol what are you even trying to say? The incoherence is funny considering you’re from a literature instance

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you find confusing? It's a pretty simple statement.

[–] lesbiankirby 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bros unironically don’t think liberals are right wing.

Who is “bros”? If it’s hexbear, im pretty sure hexbear does consider liberals right wing

Right wing is when you shout “Death to Israel?”

Opposing a genocidal ethnostate is right wing?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Bros" are the people you are talking to, who are complaining that the hexbears call capitalists right wingers. The hexbears consider liberals right wing because they are.

The second is an example of something a hexbear might say that someone who doesn't know anything about politics might interpret as right wing thought.

This should be extremely clear to a reader who understands both the current discussion and underlying basic theory, unless they just assume anything they can't parse is an attack and lash out in attempted retaliation.

Consider requesting clarification in the future before you resort to personal attacks. Especially ones that say much about you, and not much about the person you are attacking.

[–] lesbiankirby 4 points 1 year ago

You were responding to me asking about what was right wing about hexbear. Was it not reasonable that I assumed your response was referring to hexbear? Your reply was vague to the point of incoherence and I pointed it out, im not going to save your feelings in a thread where people are defending capitalism.

Anyways it seems we agree about opposing liberals from the left and opposing Israel so I’m going to disengage after this. Genuinely, have a good day!

[–] ZodiacSF1969 0 points 1 year ago

Are you kidding? They unironically are fans of Stalin and other left wing ideologues. I have never seen a hexbear user who was anything but left wing.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They tend to be very vocal in calling out racism, sexism, homophobia and other forms of bigotry

To me it seems more like creative interpretation of everything as those things if it doesn't fit with their groupthink. It's not "calling out" if they're abusing it as a general purpose weapon, that's just bullying.

[–] emergencyfood 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But bigots should be bullied until they shut up. No one has a right to treat others as subhuman. I often see casual bigotry on lemmy and other forums, and this is probably the first time I'm seeing such an active resistance. Hexbears are definitely blind to bad things when they are done by certain people, but they are 100% right in pointing out bad things done by everyone else.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But bigots should be bullied until they shut up

That's not what I was talking about though. From what I've seen it seems like the average hexbear user's definition of a bigot is everyone who disagrees with them. So this isn't about bullying bigots, it's about using the concept of a bigot as an excuse for bullying.

[–] emergencyfood 3 points 1 year ago

This isn't what I've seen so far. But I guess we'll see, going forward.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They tend to be very vocal in calling out racism, sexism, homophobia and other forms of bigotry

Yes, they're CCP LLMs and useful idiots emphasizing social tension in democratic countries in order to cause instability.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

certain authoritarian countries

Which ones?

[–] aBundleOfFerrets 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

China, mostly. But some of them do shill for russia too.

[–] Kecessa 24 points 1 year ago

And North Korea...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

But why? What's the motivation?

[–] Kecessa 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Zirconium 4 points 1 year ago

Doesn't help that leftist intellectuals don't do their damn research and blame NATO for the Ukraine war. Popular intellectuals really sound dumb the second they step out of field. Like Richard Dawkins not understanding transgender people and trying to frame it as "just asking question."

[–] winterayars 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

China is a "successful" example of a "communist" state and for young people attracted to communism that's kinda all they've got. Not a good approach imo, China fucking sucks.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] winterayars 2 points 1 year ago

I actually agree but here we are.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eh, Cuba is a decent example, but they never seem to talk about it too much. China is absolutely not communist by any means. They can call it anything they want, but they have the 2nd most amount of billionaires in the world right behind the US. They are capitalist at this point with a few communist policies sprinkled in their government processes.

[–] winterayars 2 points 1 year ago

Cuba is a much better example, yes.

[–] mindbleach 9 points 1 year ago

"Communism, like Soviet Russia" has three common responses.

1: Denying the country was communist, saying communism has never been tried.

2: Calling it a failure case, like how liberal democracies also suffer dictatorship.

3: "That was totally communism and that means it was awesome!"

/r/EnoughLibertarianSpam, /r/Politics, /r/ChapoTrapHouse.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why are you asking these people about hexbear's positions, reasoning, and motivations, instead of asking hexbear?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because to me, it sounds like hexbear is full of psychopaths and trolls?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yeah, but you're getting that impression secondhand

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think I'm comfortable with that

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

even though someone's telling you it's bullshit?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Nah, I've since had a little time to peruse hexbear HQ and it's a legitimate tire fire of a community