this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
516 points (93.7% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3781 readers
1522 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@[email protected] for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 day ago (9 children)

You hated Discovery because it was too woke.

I hated Discovery because it wasn’t woke enough.

We are not the same.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I hated Discovery because it was written like a chorus of monkeys with typewriters and not a single one of them got close to Hamlet.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 hours ago

At least they got the "travel the galaxy on shrooms" part correctly.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I hated discovery because of spore drives and logic extremists.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I dislike it because of "shit wrapped in shiny", and the black lead woman only capable of doing one expression of emotion: You put it up my ass! But wait! maybe I like it?

[–] [email protected] 35 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Picard: “We work to better ourselves and the rest of humanity”

Tilly: “I went to Elon Musk junior high school”

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I'm just going to pretend it's one of his descendants with the same name who actually managed to do some good

[–] vaultdweller013 2 points 3 hours ago

Coulld alse be named similar to a area near me, the Native Tribes never named it so its named after a random Bandit who got murdered there.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Yea, Discovery is the best case for virtue signaling being a real thing, which is unfortunate because Trek's literal entire thing is coming off as "common sense" while spreading a progressive message through allegory.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

I have to say, I tried really hard but holy crap was the "in your face-ness" of it a problem for me and one of like 5 reasons I can't stand it.

It's definitely not any of the concepts, etc. Good to see diverse, women-strong, etc casts and plots. But a lot of it was written A) incredibly poorly, like to try to appeal to middle schoolers, B) it couldn't stop telling us REALLY LOUD and artificially how progressive it was, and it was jarring and annoying.

Edit: and I'd argue they dropped nearly all of the progressive parts of, say TNG. Or, like, where adults acted like grownups.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I have only one response to you:

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

That episode very directly mocks the whole concept of racism in a way everybody will understand and without pointing fingers. It's ridiculous, why do they care so much which sides the colors are on, come on! Oh, wait...

That's what Star Trek does best: Examine problems we have through the lens of weird aliens. The audience can then make the connection to the real world.

Writing in the new shows doesn't really do that as much, partially because they don't really do alien of the week type episodes anymore (disclaimer: I haven't seen SNW). So my impression is that they instead more or less directly and somewhat clumsily talk about current-day issues without the extra layer, which also diminishes the positive future aspect Star Trek is supposed to show. Especially Picard felt really off for me because of that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The claim was that Discovery was too in-your-face about this stuff. I don't think you can get more in-your-face than that without Kirk turning to the camera and saying, "get it? GET IT?!"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 minutes ago* (last edited 1 minute ago)

I'd say making an obvious analogy is being less in-your-face than transplanting one of today's problems onto the Federation's future society. The layer of fiction is what makes it effective IMO.

Nobody will feel called out by the ridiculously hate-filled half-black half-white aliens, but if one group was black and the other was white it would be a different story. Making them green and purple would also be less effective because people could just map those to human skin colours. That, I think, is what people find in-your-face. Doing it the way they did on TOS (aliens of the week that literally look the same except mirrored, no clear good/bad side) puts the ridiculousness of the concept itself front and center, not how the story could be a direct translation of our current issues.

The black-and-white aliens aren't a subtle analogy but I think it's smarter than people give it credit for.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

it couldn’t stop telling us REALLY LOUD and artificially how progressive it was, and it was jarring and annoying.

Do you have any examples of this?

Edit: Well, they edited their comment and have replied to a bunch of other people yet haven't responded here so... I'm going to go with no. They don't have any examples of this. Mainly because it didn't happen.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago

Even then, Trek hasn't really pushed the boundaries for a good long time. When it hit it big by TNG/TOS Syndication, it ended up being the cash cow, and thus not worth risking for such controversial things.

At most, it's just been nudging the norm, but the kind of radical shove that TOS had, and nearly got it pulled off the air twice is basically nowhere to be found.

At most, we got one or two token characters or plots, but a lot of it is mostly the norm, or just a little ahead of it.

Compare it to something less established and free to take on more risk, like the Orville. Since it doesn't have the big brand that networks want to keep reaping without sowing, it gets a lot of flexibility Trek doesn't really have any more.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago

I loved Discovery

[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hated it because half of the characters annoyed me and the other half didn’t have enough screen time

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 hours ago

I fucking loathe the series for introducing "Frieza" (the half mecha character), and IMMEDIATELY killing her off. Finally a somewhat interesting character, and they get fucking rid of her. Pisses me the fuck off

[–] [email protected] 16 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, really. There wasn't much enlightened future stuff going on and they pointlessly killed (and then returned, but still) one of the gay guys for shock value(?). It's just so poorly written that neither that nor any of the empowerment messages landed for me.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah.. exactly. Although after all that I only fully gave up on the show when they jumped forward in time to a depressing future in which the Federation had dissolved. Like, way to completely and utterly miss the point of the setting. I’m gonna go cry into my earl grey now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago

Everything after the time jump felt like they were going off whatever Gene's notes ended up becoming Andromeda.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago

I thought it was because they'd received enough backlash from yet another TOS era setting/characters which contradicts canon and finally listened to advance the story into post-NEM territory. Instead they went to ludicrous speed and completely overshot everything.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 15 hours ago

I was totally on board with that premise, thinking they might basically do their version of Andromeda mixed with late-season Enterprise. But then the actual plot happened.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I was more annoyed at the klingon subtitle style/font being difficult to read quickly. Each one talking like a kid who just shoved a whole pack of Big League Chew in their mouth from all the prosthetics also bothered me.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Each one talking like a kid who just shoved a whole pack of Big League Chew in their mouth from all the prosthetics also bothered me.

Even worse than how bad the Ferengi were with that

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

You know, you just reminded me of the episode of Enterprise where the Ferrengi took over the ship. And I was surprised how much I enjoyed (most of) it, and thought the first act where they didn't bother giving the Ferrengi subtitlea, everything was communicated without the benefit of dialog.

I'm sure everyone else hated it, especially because of some of the weak plot points and how there wasn't supposed to be any contact with the Ferrengi for 200 years and because everyone hates Enterprise.

On the other hand, it had Jeffrey Combs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

especially because of some of the weak plot points and how there wasn’t supposed to be any contact with the Ferrengi for 200 years

What got me was that Ferengi, when originally introduced, were practically completely unknown to federation despite rumor and conjecture. Yet by the time DS9 premiered they're long established in alpha quadrant economics