this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
62 points (75.4% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6659 readers
347 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
62
PSA TO NCD USERS (self.noncredibledefense)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by nuke to c/noncredibledefense
 

I'm sorry some posts are being removed from this community. It is the actions of the Lemmy blahaj zone admins. There's nothing we can do to prevent this. I suggest changing your instance to a better one.

Update: Blahaj blocked NCD

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's very important that we know in to make informed choices about instances going forward ^and^ ^also^ ^we^ ^love^ ^drama^

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The fact that the instance is named after an IKEA product was enough reason for me not to make an account there...

I get it, the shark plush is cute. Just a bit too....consumer? For me

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

My limited understanding is that there's an association between the shark's colors and the trans flag, and that this predates that instance in the trans world.

Honestly, I don't even care if people want to run a censored instance -- like, some people legitimately do not want to see some content -- but I do think that they should be clear that they are doing so, which it sounds like they were not in this case.

Also does make one wonder whether other material might be missing on other topics from other communities.

ponders

As a general solution to making instance censorship visible, I suppose that it'd be technically-possible to write a bot that could spider Threadiverse instances and look for discrepancies between views of a community, provide a summary of instance censorship activity. If an admin wanted to silently censor content and wanted to go to enough work to make the censorship silent, they could try to identify the bot and only show posts to it, but I imagine that it'd be more work, especially if it acted anonymously and from a VPN.

As a bonus, that could also flag post propagation problems of the sort I mentioned elsewhere in this thread, kind of be a "Threadiverse health monitor".