this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
339 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

68495 readers
4895 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 39 points 5 months ago (2 children)

5.25" floppies were obsolete for years before they even installed the system in 1998. They could have been using compact flash cards by then.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Compact flash? Nah, that was primetime for Iomega Zip Drives!

[–] clay_pidgin 22 points 5 months ago

Fear the click of death!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

Fuck yo Zip Drives, all my homies use SyQuest

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

It would have been replaced a long time ago if that was the case.

[–] ayyy 1 points 5 months ago

SuperDisk gang ride up!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

It’s not quite as crazy as it seems. The older/larger floppy disk formats were more reliable due to their lower track density.

There was more surface area per byte of data. The old floppy disks could be written once and read for years in harsher environments. New floppy disks we more prone to failure after a few years.