this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
1311 points (92.9% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26987 readers
3533 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's so sad to me. From my POV being non-binary isn't aggressive. It's just that there are more important things to worry about than gender.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I think it's just the term. "Binary" isn't exactly neutral as it can imply narrow minded. Also labelling non-X imply that everyone else is X which often includes too many people that are kind of in the middle / doesn't really care.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (4 children)

so what would you suggest people who do not want to be referred to as man or woman call themselves?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Blenders. Gender ephemeral. Intangibles. An even cooler fourth option, probably.

There are tons of cool names you could go with when your identity lies outside of preconceived boundaries (and pretty much transcends them). But, non-binary's pretty clinical-sounding, so I guess it's easier to work into a professional setting or something.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Enbies? Although the base of the term does come back around to the original phrase.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

grogsnarl the fifth, conqueror of silesia

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

On the gender spectrum?

I don't know, I think this debate is silly.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It’s easy to call a discussion silly if it doesn’t affect you personally.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I just mean this whole premise. The idea that being nonbinary is its own binary. It's a categorically different comparison. The "binaries" OP sets up are a:b versus (a+b):c, when really it should be a+b+c+d etc.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The comment you were replying to wasn’t about the image in the op though. It was a discussion about someone not liking people who do not identify as man or woman referring to themselves as non-binary.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Line 1 and line 2 are different thoughts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Also have you ever considered the fact that maybe you (or other people) don’t really care about gender labels because you were assigned as the gender you prefer? It seems a bit silly to criticise a group who currently faces a lot of discrimination based on their gender preference. Also are you aware that your argument is often used to discredit the experiences of and as a reason to discriminate against people who identify as non-binary?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

It seems a bit silly to criticise a group ... based on their gender preference

Like, didn't I just say that it's the vibe of the word that I don't like? Therefore either

  1. I am not criticizing any specific people at all because I'm just talking about how we use words; OR
  2. I am criticizing some people for their taste of words

and not what you say at all IMO

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

yeah, that's understandable. i'd never thought about it that way before.

personally i use enby as a way to say that i am in the middle / don't really care.

i think the issue comes from the fact that saying non-binary means specifically non-{man,woman}. whereas i've always interpreted it as just non-"specific gender".

to me it's the etc. of gender labels, but i realise that not everyone that i think it describes would want to identify with it.

(and that means it becomes it's own label, and now we have to figure out what to call everyone_else all over again. (maybe the whole idea of gender labels was rigged from the start))