As long as it's not a state university. The Florida government is doing all in its power to put their state universities to work as conservative ideology factories.

Be it PlayStation, Xbox, or Nintendo, the right-most face button is the only one that is not X on any of them.

If Renotec Not Safe? Don't!

It's no fucking joke that regular human contact, physical contact, is a basic need.

I would disagree on this aspect; I am pretty touch averse myself and last I checked I am still human. Maybe some folks feel they require a certain degree of intimacy, but I don't think we should count this as a universal truth and give any credence to the notion that incels are entitled to intimate contact as a basic need.

Just be aware that the JR pass is meant to be a form of soft power expression, with the goal being to make it easy for tourists to get places to spend money and then make them want to share stories about how great the rail system is in Japan when they leave.

They don't allow such good deals for their own residents, only tourists, since JR pass requires you to be a non-resident. For everyone else, it is far more expensive to travel moderate distances by rail than it even is to fly in most circumstances in Japan.

Unless they count the shoulders as their own lanes, I don't see 26 either.

But I was told all politics in Europe are left of America's left.

Dead

TBF, like half the content here, this would qualify if it was just superimposed on a Twitter post with some caption like "Me fr fr"

Makes me wonder if those $80 Monster HDMI cables were lucrative. Might be that the rule applies not just to luxury goods, but for any good where the consumer is too ignorant of the market to have any frame of reference to compare to (e.g. the technologically illiterate).

But again, you can make that argument about any platform or medium where speech can be posted or displayed. If the department of public health condemns a local movie theater where I host indie movie screenings, that is not a violation of my first amendment rights because they are not prohibiting my ability to make or share content, they are simply removing the space it is currently shared. If that comes out to the same effect for some people who are all-in on TikTok to the exclusion of any other short-form video sharing service, sure, maybe there are grievances. But that still ends up being a self-imposition made by the individual at the end of the day.

Not to mention, the US government is not trying to close down TikTok. They are prohibiting the owners of TikTok from doing business in the US. The company itself would be the one to make the decision to close the service rather than sell it off, so unless the fed is going to force a private business to keep itself open to placate the masses, it's a decision made by a private company outside of any constitutional law.

This MF right now