theonlytruescotsman

That's less than a third of the countries in the world.

They don't though, not at the top top. The goal for some is to remove capitalism after the chaff has been thoroughly separated from the wheat.

They suffer the working class and petit bourgeois because they need people to make their things, contribute to their lives in some alienated way; but if they believe they can get those things without the lower classes' stink all over, then they'll eliminate the working class.

They no longer need assistants or secretaries thanks to LLMs allowing natural language interfaces to software. They keep getting sold on the idea of robot workers and maintenance robots to fix the robots and such. They think it's close to time to end it.

Wouldn't you be more comfortable on .world with the rest of the class traitors?

The difference being a word that typically means remove from power. Not a threat. Any lawyer can get the case dismissed by showing the book with the original words in court and argue it's a natural play on words anyone could come up with.

If it's blue it's not getting enough oxygen and needs some mouth to reverse mouth resuscitation.

Not all games need to be eternal game projects that the dev commits themselves to for the rest of time. Normalize normal release schedules and letting games end.

Each gun requires training to use optimally, each gun requires different parts to repair it, each gun has different reliability issues. The reason any military limits the type of firearms in use is to reduce logistics cost and complexity. If you have one main battle rifle in use that's standardized across the military, you don't need a million training programs, you need one, you don't need ten billion supply chains for replacement parts, you need one, and you don't have to keep track of what soldier is trained in what guns beyind their mos.

Militaries are just logistics companies that get to kill people. Simplifying logistics then allows them to kill more people.

You can get married to whomever you like in China, you just don't get the tax break. And yeah, that sucks they're a decade behind the US on that one subject, tax breaks for gay couples, while being a century ahead in other subjects.

You know you can go to China yourself and verify that's false.

ML has always been fairly tame*, the problem is liberal programming has made them react violently to anything that threatens the status quo, and ml users tend to offer critical support of distasteful people and regimes.

The way neo/libs are reacting to this topic is the same as they react to anyone questioning why zelensky is now one of the wealthiest people in the region.

Edit* compared to the grad or hexbear or some unspeakable instances.

If it turns out the only solution to climate change is depopulation as research is starting to point to, would a volunteer service or a random lottery be more humane?

What part of uighur culture was erased, exactly, by funding schools, arresting foreign violent religious extremists, and building affordable housing?

Are you saying uighurs are all violent, uneducated, homeless people and should remain that way due to their culture?

Just a reminder before you do the next state dept line, there are more mosques in every major Chinese city than there are in the state of New York.