Well, they fixed one problem, but now there's another.
Edit: There we go!
It's completely in context. We have the complete context. It's in response to an AI generated walk cycle, and he specifically called out the technology as something he never wants to work with. The people he spoke to said they wanted to make an AI that can draw like humans do, which is how generative AI is described.
Why did you specify American jews, then? Historally, all Americans treated blacks poorly, as did all of europe. Why specify the jews while making no mention of the non-jews doing the same thing?
Everything else you said was just paper-thin excuses. Your comment was present tense, so it's not about history. Your claim in that other thread was disproven and you only said "lol" in response. Nobody is buying it because we know the actual reason you said your comment. And so do you.
I checked your comment history since you didn't post it yourself. You claimed MBFC was biased, they asked for an example, and you refused. You even acted like THEY were being lazy because YOU didn't want to do the legwork of explaining your own opinion. You were absolutely being a bit of an arse.
That said, I don't know if it's ban-worthy, and it's a damn unprofessional ban at that. I think BPR fits best.
It's fun when a character within a story says exactly what the audience has been saying.