Kalcifer

joined 2 years ago
[–] Kalcifer 7 points 3 weeks ago

what a day to have eyes

[–] Kalcifer 4 points 3 weeks ago

That reminds me of this post:

It is an X post that reads: Adding helicopters near the start of game dev: "A Helicopter is a Vehicle." Adding helicopters late in game dev: "When you think about it, a Helicopter is just a very advanced type of Door." ^[1]^

References

  1. Type: Post. Author: "Tom Francis" ("@Pentadact"). Publisher: "X". Published: 2023-05-04T20:39:01.000Z. Accessed: 2025-06-02T07:09Z. URI: https://x.com/Pentadact/status/1654224129594384384?lang=en.
[–] Kalcifer 3 points 3 weeks ago

Similarly, if you were going to fly on an airplane, people would say what time does your plane land? They don’t think you own the plane.

I think that's a fair point!

[–] Kalcifer 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

[…] You had a misunderstanding.

When I first read it, it felt, to me, like they were insinuating that she was on board and in transit while it happened, but on second thought perhaps I read too much into it.

[–] Kalcifer 0 points 3 weeks ago

Hrm, idk. I think I would just avoid the reference altogether. It feels, to me, like the reference emotionally charges the reporting too much for my liking. That being said, perhaps something more like this: "A month after a ship with the same destination that she was to board was allegedly bombed, Greta Thunberg sets sail to Gaza.".

[–] Kalcifer -4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (5 children)

EDIT (2025-06-02T06:55Z): I think I'm overthinking it 😆 please disregard the following comment.


[…] She tried the same about a month ago and her ship was bombed in a drone strike.

Depending on exactly what they mean by "her ship", this is either false or misleading. Presumably, they are referring to the incident that occurred on 2025 May 2 ^[1]^ where the Conscience was struck while still at anchor in Malta ^[1.2]^; however, Greta Thunberg was not on board that ship during the incident ^[2]^, but she was supposed to board it ^[2]^. Therefore, it would be false if, by "her ship", they meant she was physically present on the ship during the incident, or it would be misleading, imo, if, by "her ship", they mean that she was supposed to be on it. Another possible option could be that they meant that she personally owns the ship; however, if so, that would also be false, as it is owned by a Turkish NGO ^[1.1]^.

References

  1. Type: Article. Title: "2025 Gaza Freedom Flotilla incident". Publisher: "Wikipedia". Published: 2025-05-30T03:31Z. Accessed: 2025-06-02T05:28Z. URI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Gaza_Freedom_Flotilla_incident.
    1. Type: Text. Location: §"Background". §"Freedom Flotilla Coalition". §"The Conscience".

      […] the vessel is owned by the Turkish non-governmental organization Foundation for Human Rights and Freedoms and Humanitarian Relief (İHH). […]

    2. Type: Text. Location: §"Incident". ¶1.

      […] The boat was on its way to Malta to collect more aid and pick up 44 passengers. According to reports, while still at anchor, the vessel was struck shortly after midnight local time on 2 May by what were described as missiles launched from two drones. […]

  2. Type: Article. Title: "Was Greta Thunberg on the ship that caught fire off Malta after alleged Israeli drone attack?". Publisher: "The Times of India". Published: 2025-05-05T21:02+05:30. Accessed: 2025-06-02T05:34Z. URI: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/europe/was-greta-thunberg-on-the-ship-that-caught-fire-off-malta-after-alleged-israeli-drone-attack/articleshow/120904802.cms?hl=en-US.
    • Type: Text. Location: ¶1.

      […] as clarified by Greta in her statement, that she was supposed to board the vessel but was not on it. […]

[–] Kalcifer 8 points 4 weeks ago

Saddam is bricked up /j

[–] Kalcifer 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Personally, I haven't watched the second season because I haven't played the second game yet. Though, in all honesty, if I haven't played it by now, I'm likely not going to play it any time soon, so I should probably just watch the show.

[–] Kalcifer 2 points 1 month ago

It took me until ”🤕🍦🎖️" to realize what I was reading.

[–] Kalcifer 2 points 1 month ago

That's pretty neat!

[–] Kalcifer 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

bebes

I can hear this word.

 

The Issue

Currently, it seems to be that the majority of instance defederations happen silently on SJW: As of writing this, SJW currently blocks federation with 86 instances ^[1]^, yet, from what I can tell ^[2]^, there has not been 86 announcements. For clarity, this is not intended to be construed as an accusation, pointed at the SJW admins, that this is some sort of intentional obfuscation; however, for the sake of transparency and understanding, I think it would be a good practice to open these practices up to the rest of the instance.

Proposal

I propose that whenever an instance is to be defederated, an open (ie unlocked) post should be published by the SJW admins (eg it could be published to [email protected]) detailing the name of the instance that is to be defederated, the rationale for why it is to be defederated (including evidence to support the rationale), and what steps would need to be taken by the respective instance's admins in order for that instance to be re-federated.

Benefits

  • I think it would provide users with an opportunity to better understand the rationale and alignment SJW's admins.
  • I think it helps keep the administrators (both locally and federated) publicly accountable.
  • Having an open announcement for defederation could invite discussion on the topic. I think this discussion could offer enlightening insight.
  • It will create a sort of searchable database for users to reference if they wish to know why a given instance is defederated.
  • I think it could potentially reduce the administrative burden on the admins in that it serves as a sort of FAQ in place of users repetitively asking the admins why an instance was defederated.
  • I think that It may provide a more targeted opportunity for the admins of the defederated instance to directly, and publicly, engage with the issue.

Drawbacks

  • If there ends up being a large volume of defederations, this practice may end up becoming a sizeable burden for the SJW admins. One note on this is that it may be possible for some defederations to be grouped together, but this would have to be done carefully so as to not become obfuscative.

Additional Context

I think a potential counterargument could be: "If a user wishes to know more about why an instance is defederated, then they should just make a post asking about it, or they should dm the admins."; however, I think this may actually increase the workload on the admins if the question is posed frequently enough, furthermore, I fear that this sort of active approach on the part of the inquirer could have a sort of chilling effect: the topic of "instance defederation" is often a contentious one, and some may be hesitant to actively open themselves up to that sort of potential conflict in order to seek the desired information. This proposal would offer sanctuary for the inquisitive lurker.

References

  1. Type: Website. Publisher: sh.itjust.works. Accessed: 2025-03-03T05:15Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/instances.
    • See the "Blocked Instances" tab.
  2. I simply searched for posts with keywords like "defederate" and "block" in [email protected].
 

References

  • Type: Video. Title: "Casually Explained: The Political Compass". Author: "Casually Explained". Publisher: YouTube. Published: 2025-02-28T14:00:57Z. Accessed: 2025-03-02T21:54Z. URI: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGEWPY3nqHw.
 

nginx ("engine x") is an HTTP web server, reverse proxy, content cache, load balancer, TCP/UDP proxy server, and mail proxy server. […] [1]

I still pronounce it as "n-jinx" in my head.

References

  1. Title (website): "nginx". Publisher: NGINX. Accessed: 2025-02-26T23:25Z. URI: https://nginx.org/en/.
    • §"nginx". ¶1.
 

I propose that the UI version be included alongside the backend version at the bottom of the page. For example, Lemmy.ml does this ^[1]^:

I think this information is useful to have for diagnostic purposes, reporting bugs, and for referencing documentation.

References

  1. Lemmy.ml. Lemmy. Accessed: 2025-02-08T05:59Z. URI: https://lemmy.ml/.
    • Found at the bottom of the page.
 

Unclasped version

 

I think it could be useful to collect this data, both for administrative and research purposes.

I'm unsure, currently, exactly what data should be collected by the censuses (that would be proposed and discussed here). The data that is collected, should be collected anonymously. Furthermore, participation should be entirely voluntary.

 

References

 

In case you aren't sure what to look for: If you look at the left side of the tracks, you can see the imprint of the wing feathers on the snow. I'm guessing this is where the bird landed on top of the prey, which it saw on the surface of the snow.

15
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Kalcifer to c/[email protected]
 

Solution

The Lemmy server appears to have a database limit of 255 characters ^[2]^; however, individual instances appear to put their own limits on username length though the frontend ^[3]^ and/or the API ^[4.1][4.2]^.

Original Post

If you know, please also provide relevant documentation.

UPDATE (2025-02-02T06:06Z): I did some brute-force testing, and, at least for sh.itjust.works, it seems that the maximum username length is 50, and the maximum password length is 60 ^[1]^.


References

  1. "Sign Up". sh.itjust.works. Lemmy. Accessed: 2025-02-02T08:49Z. https://sh.itjust.works/signup.
    • When creating an account on sh.itjust.works, the sign-up form will throw this error if the provided password is greater than 60 characters in length.
  2. @[email protected] To: ["[SOLVED] What is the maximum username length for a Lemmy account?". "Kalcifer" @[email protected]. "Lemmy Support" [email protected]. sh.itjust.works. Lemmy. Published: 2025-02-03T00:54:51Z. https://sh.itjust.works/post/32085936.]. Published: 2025-02-02T05:57:26Z. Accessed: 2025-02-03T00:44Z. https://sh.itjust.works/post/32085936/16442382.

    It might be 255 characters? […]

    • They pointed to code on GitHub for the Lemmy server which outlines the length of the username data in the SQL database.
  3. "[SOLVED] What is the maximum username length for a Lemmy account?". "Kalcifer" @[email protected]. "Lemmy Support" [email protected]. sh.itjust.works. Lemmy. Published: 2025-02-03T00:54:51Z. Accessed: 2025-02-03T00:46Z. https://sh.itjust.works/post/32085936.
    • §"Original Post". ¶2.

      […] I did some brute-force testing, and, at least for sh.itjust.works, it seems that the maximum username length is 50 […]

      • The maximum username length for sh.itjust.works was found to be 50 characters by brute-force testing the length limit.
  4. "Andrew" @andrew_[email protected] To ["[SOLVED] What is the maximum username length for a Lemmy account?". "Kalcifer" @[email protected]. "Lemmy Support" [email protected]. sh.itjust.works. Lemmy. Published: 2025-02-03T00:54:51Z. https://sh.itjust.works/post/32085936.] Published: 2025-02-02T19:57:49Z. Accessed: 2025-02-03T00:59Z. https://sh.itjust.works/post/32085936/16453656.
    1. curl -L http://lemmy.world/api/v3/site | jq -r .site_view.local_site.actor_name_max_length (26)

      • The maximum username length for Lemmy.world was found to be 26 characters via an API request.
    2. curl -L http://sh.itjust.works/api/v3/site | jq -r .site_view.local_site.actor_name_max_length (50)

      • The maximum username length for sh.itjust.works was found to be 50 characters via an API request.
 

References

 
  • R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, s. 365. Justice Laws Website. Government of Canada. Published: 2024-12-10. Accessed: 2025-01-04T22:46Z. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/section-365-20030101.html.

    365 Every one who fraudulently

    (a) pretends to exercise or to use any kind of witchcraft, sorcery, enchantment or conjuration,

    (b) undertakes, for a consideration, to tell fortunes, or

    (c) pretends from his skill in or knowledge of an occult or crafty science to discover where or in what manner anything that is supposed to have been stolen or lost may be found,

    is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

  • "An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Department of Justice Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act" C-51. 42nd Parliament, 1st session. Parliament of Canada. Published: 2018-12-13. Accessed: 2025-01-04T22:50Z. https://www.parl.ca/legisinfo/en/bill/42-1/c-51.
    • §41

      Section 365 of the Act is repealed.

view more: ‹ prev next ›