Say a user from Instance B commented on a post on Instance A, and a user on Instance A saw it. If the user on Instance A were to report it, would that report be seen by the admin(s) of Instance B, or would it only be visible by the admin(s) of Instance A?

6

"Gaslighting ChatGPT With Ethical Dilemmas" by Alex O'Connor (www.youtube.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by Kalcifer to c/[email protected]

0 comments fedilink

Referencs

Title: "Gaslighting ChatGPT With Ethical Dilemmas". Author: "Alex O'Connor". YouTube. Published: 2024-11-30. Accessed: 2024-12-03T02:29Z. URI: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsOLlhGA9zg.

Cross-posts

https://sh.itjust.works/post/28943223

8

"Gaslighting ChatGPT With Ethical Dilemmas" by Alex O'Connor (www.youtube.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by Kalcifer to c/[email protected]

2 comments fedilink

Referencs

Title: "Gaslighting ChatGPT With Ethical Dilemmas". Author: "Alex O'Connor". YouTube. Published: 2024-11-30. Accessed: 2024-12-03T02:29Z. URI: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsOLlhGA9zg.

Cross-posts

https://sh.itjust.works/post/28943226

93

Meru (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by Kalcifer to c/[email protected]

3 comments fedilink

This was my first time using alcohol markers. They're definitely different, but I like them a lot. It's far from perfect, but I think it's alright 😊. Note: While this was done freehand by me, the pose and everything wasn't my idea — I used this image as a reference.

12

[SOLVED] When creating a post, how does the "Thumbnail URL" option work exactly? (self.lemmy_support)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by Kalcifer to c/[email protected]

5 comments fedilink

Solution

As was pointed out by @[email protected] ^[1]^, this feature was added in this pull request. It appears that the custom thumbnail field is only relevant for posts that share a URL: The "Thumbnail URL" field is used to specify a custom thumbnail to be used in place of what would've been automatically generated by the provided URL ^[2]^.

Original Post

I thought it would be for adding a custom thumbnail that appears for the post in the feed, but then that seems to be a duplicate of adding an image. At any rate, I tried adding an image link to it, and no image showed up for the post. So I'm not entirely sure what it's actually for.

EDIT (2024-11-30T22:22): Perhaps it's for the pre-expanded thumbnail for a post if it has an image? Does that mean that it only works if you have an image specified? Can it be used to override the thumbnail that's generated from a shared article? Does it work for a text post?

References

@[email protected] [To: "When creating a post, how does the "Thumbnail URL" option work exactly?". "Kalcifer" (@[email protected]). sh.itjust.works. Published: 2024-11-30T22:24:10Z. Accessed: 2024-12-02T07:06Z. https://sh.itjust.works/post/28843300]. Feddit.org. Published: 2024-12-01T23:37:14Z. https://feddit.org/comment/3413077.
"crates/api_crud/src/post/create.rs". LemmyNet/Lemmy. GitHub. Published: 2024-12-01T01:14:07.000Z. Commit: 5085d1c. Accessed: 2024-12-02T06:40Z. https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/blob/e49d346535f0769b85ad0fa4b0baabfbdba0deff/crates/api_crud/src/post/create.rs.
- L91-L99
```
// Only generate the thumbnail if there's no custom thumbnail provided,
// otherwise it will save it in pictrs
let generate_thumbnail = custom_thumbnail.is_none();

// Fetch post links and pictrs cached image
let metadata = fetch_link_metadata_opt(url.as_ref(), generate_thumbnail, &context).await;
let url = proxy_image_link_opt_apub(url, &context).await?;
let thumbnail_url = proxy_image_link_opt_apub(custom_thumbnail, &context)
  .await?
  .map(Into::into)
  .or(metadata.thumbnail);
```
  - L93: A check is done for whether a custom thumbnail URL was provided.
  - L96: If it wasn't, then one will be generated from the shared URL.
  - L98: If a custom thumbnail URL was provided, it will be fetched from pictrs.
  - L99: If a custom thumbnail was not provided, fallback to the generated thumbnail.

5

MVX Nexus is a proposed rail network for the south-coast (self.britishcolumbia)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Kalcifer to c/[email protected]

1 comments fedilink

MVX Nexus, envisioned by Mountain Valley Express ^[2]^, a non-profit ^[3.1][3.2][4.2]^, based out of Metro Vancouver ^[4.1]^, is a regional rail network ^[2.1]^ proposed for the south-coast ^[2.1]^.

^[5]^

References

"B.C. group proposes railway to connect most of the South Coast". CBC British Columbia. YouTube. Published: 2024-11-28. Accessed: 2024-11-30T03:35Z. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIYRUAkEUu4.
"MVX Nexus". Mountain Valley Express Society. Published: 2023. Accessed: 2024-11-30T03:29Z. https://www.mvx.vision/assets/nexus-min.pdf.
1. §"Executive Summary"
  
  MVX Nexus is a fresh take on mobility on the South Coast. It is a 350-km regional rail network that connects Metro Vancouver with the mountains and the valley with connections to ferries and is future-proofed for eventual transborder high-speed rail.
"About". Mountain Valley Express Society. Accessed: 2024-11-30T03:30Z. https://www.mvx.vision/about.html.
1. Mountain Valley Express is a nonprofit Research and Advocacy organization dedicated to bringing world-class regional rail to the South Coast of BC.
2. §"About the Society"
  
  MVX is a member- and donor-funded nonprofit society. The Society exists to conduct research and advocacy on public transit/transportation in the Lower Mainland.
"Mountain Valley Express (MVX)". LinkedIn. Accessed: 2024-11-30T03:36Z. https://www.linkedin.com/company/mountain-valley-express-mvx/.
1. Headquarters: Metro Vancouver
2. Type: Nonprofit
"Mountain Valley Express". Mountain Valley Express Society. Accessed: 2024-11-30T03:46Z. https://www.mvx.vision/index.html.

42

These were found in Cascadia in mid-November. What are they? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Kalcifer to c/[email protected]

6 comments fedilink

They were found in mid-november in the Salish Coast region of Cascadia. They were growing out of woodchips composed of a mixture of western hemlock (majority), and western red cedar.

Side view of one full mature specimen:

A group with a sample of the substrate (the cap appears to be umbonate):

A closeup side view, and internal view of the stem (it appears to be hollow):

Cross section of the gills — they appear to be adnate, or sub-decurrent:

Underside of view of the gills:

Spore print (first on white background (the split is due to two halves), second on a black background):

Examples specimens once dried:

Examples of the colony, and the location/substrate in which it was growing:

My initial thought was that they were Psilocybe cyanescens, but that's pretty much completely been confirmed as incorrect [1][2][3][4][5]. The current running theory is that they are Hypholoma dispersum[2][3]. What do you think they are?

References

@Fliegenpilzgü[email protected]. [To: "Found in mid-November in Cascadia. What are they? Please see the description for more information.". "Kalcifer" (@[email protected]). "Forage Fellows 🍄🌱" ([email protected]).]. sh.itjust.works. Lemmy. Published: 2024-11-20T13:30:31Z. Accessed: 2024-11-23T03:16Z. https://sh.itjust.works/post/28348066/15147149.

[...] I’m sorry to disappoint you, but even though they look similar to P. cyanescens, they aren’t.

Cyans have white-ish stems, dark gills, a purple-black spore print and bruise blue almost instantly when touching them. [...]
@the_[email protected]. [To: "Found in mid-November in Cascadia. What are they? Please see the description for more information.". "Kalcifer" (@[email protected]). "Forage Fellows 🍄🌱" ([email protected]).] sh.itjust.works. Lemmy. Published: 2024-11-20T03:46:33Z. Accessed: 2024-11-23T03:16Z.
Sorry to disappoint but looks like hypholoma dispersum to me.
- there’s no blueing on the stems or margin in any of your photos, the ones you picked should have had stained blue anywhere you touched them
- The margin isn’t translucent striate
If the cap cuticle is peelable you could make a case that it’s not Hypholoma but without any blueing it’s gonna be Deconica not Psilocybe.
@the_[email protected]. [To: "Found in mid-November in Cascadia. What are they? Please see the description for more information.". "Kalcifer" (@[email protected]). "Forage Fellows 🍄🌱" ([email protected])]. sh.itjust.works. Lemmy. Published: 2024-11-22T16:16:30Z. Accessed: 2024-11-23T03:21Z. https://sh.itjust.works/post/28348066/15185707.

That’s consistent with Hypholoma, maybe next time.
@[email protected]. [To: "Found in mid-November in Cascadia. What are they? Please see the description for more information.". "Kalcifer" (@[email protected]). "What's this fungus?" ([email protected]).]. sh.itjust.works. Lemmy. Published: 2024-11-21T00:25:10Z. Accessed: 2024-11-23T03:27Z. https://sh.itjust.works/post/28348065/15157911.

[...] If I would see even a tiny speck of blue bruising I would be more inclined to agree with P. cyanescens, but I don’t see any at all, which makes me very suspicious. [...]
@[email protected] [To: "Found in mid-November in Cascadia. What are they? Please see the description for more information.". "Kalcifer" (@[email protected]). "Mushrooms" ([email protected]). sh.itjust.works. Lemmy. Published: 2024-11-23T02:12:43Z. Accessed: 2024-11-23T03:36Z. https://sh.itjust.works/post/28348063.]. sh.itjust.works. Lemmy. Published: 2024-11-20T17:44:30Z. Accessed: 2024-11-23T03:37Z. https://sh.itjust.works/post/28348063/15151371.

the spore print is also brown here, but should be purple-ish black if it were Psilocybe spp., also the stipe looks wrong for that ID - I would say definitely not Psilocybe cyanescens (not just because they’re not bruising blue / purple / black).

Cross-posts:

27

Found in mid-November in Cascadia. What are they? Please see the description for more information. (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Kalcifer to c/[email protected]

18 comments fedilink

View the spoiler for my guess at what I think it might be, but please first come to your own conclusion before looking at mine — I don't want to bias your guess.

My guess

Psilocybe cyanescens

They were found in mid-november in the Salish Coast region of Cascadia. They were growing out of woodchips composed of a mixture of western hemlock (majority), and western red cedar.

Side view of one full mature specimen:

A group with a sample of the substrate (the cap appears to be umbonate):

A closeup side view, and internal view of the stem (it appears to be hollow):

Cross section of the gills — they appear to be adnate, or sub-decurrent:

Underside of view of the gills:

Spore print (first on white background (the split is due to two halves), second on a black background):

Examples specimens once dried:

Examples of the colony, and the location/substrate in which it was growing:

Cross-posts:

20

Found in mid-November in Cascadia. What are they? Please see the description for more information. (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Kalcifer to c/[email protected]

6 comments fedilink

View the spoiler for my guess at what I think it might be, but please first come to your own conclusion before looking at mine — I don't want to bias your guess.

My guess

Psilocybe cyanescens

They were found in mid-november in the Salish Coast region of Cascadia. They were growing out of woodchips composed of a mixture of western hemlock (majority), and western red cedar.

Side view of one full mature specimen:

A group with a sample of the substrate (the cap appears to be umbonate):

A closeup side view, and internal view of the stem (it appears to be hollow):

Cross section of the gills — they appear to be adnate, or sub-decurrent:

Underside of view of the gills:

Spore print (first on white background (the split is due to two halves), second on a black background):

Examples specimens once dried:

Examples of the colony, and the location/substrate in which it was growing:

Cross-posts:

11

Found in mid-November in Cascadia. What are they? Please see the description for more information. (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Kalcifer to c/[email protected]

40 comments fedilink

View the spoiler for my guess at what I think it might be, but please first come to your own conclusion before looking at mine — I don't want to bias your guess.

My guess

Psilocybe cyanescens

They were found in mid-november in the Salish Coast region of Cascadia. They were growing out of woodchips composed of a mixture of western hemlock (majority), and western red cedar.

Side view of one full mature specimen:

A group with a sample of the substrate (the cap appears to be umbonate):

A closeup side view, and internal view of the stem (it appears to be hollow):

Cross section of the gills — they appear to be adnate, or sub-decurrent:

Underside of view of the gills:

Spore print (first on white background (the split is due to two halves), second on a black background):

Examples specimens once dried:

Examples of the colony, and the location/substrate in which it was growing:

Cross-posts: