There's a whole section of law that determines when the police are able to take DNA samples or fingerprints, and more laws for how long they can keep that information.
It's regulated. And bringing face recognition under biometric regulation is a no-brainer.
I'm on a Poco right now. The hardware is great, so once you remove as many invasive built in apps as you can you've got yourself a great deal.
Look up how to use adb bridge to remove apps. Most are safe to remove, SOME are not. There are lists online that will tell you which is which for your make and model.
A lot of them are fixed for a period of time. Between 2 and 5 years is pretty common I think. After that you get another fixed rate for a period.
Mortgages rates have been falling for the last 12 months so it's people who went on a fixed rate prior to that.
I remember this being announced to a big fan fare... And now it's being quietly dropped. Shame on them. 1%? They didn't even try.
Anyone who hasn't played this game should do so now. It's a thing of real beauty.
Quality content. Thankyou.
A lot of these techniques are having a bit of a resurgence for mobile vr where performance is so important. Blob Shadows in 2024 who would have thought it.
Thankyou for digging past the headlines and showing your findings. No one has the time to do it all the time but together we can.
The headline says
A record 35% of people aged 18-24 were classed as ‘inactive’ this year, driven by a mental health crisis.
The FT article references this as its source of data - https://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/find-statistics/neet-statistics-annual-brief#dataBlock-58d70635-dc1a-4172-997b-fb5bc73d7166-tables .
But that source says
The percentage of the population defined as ‘not in education, employment or training’ (NEET) in 2023 is estimated to be 11.9%. This is 0.5 percentage points lower compared to the same period in 2022 where the estimated figure was 12.3%.
So where is FT getting its figures from? Or did they just pretend that training is the same thing as inactivity? (•_•)
He's got a book to sell or a gig or something. He'll try getting into headlines in any way possible right now.
It was banned because twitter failed to appoint a legal representative, a condition of doing business in Brazil. Failing to appoint a legal representative is kind of like sticking your fingers in your ears 'nya nya nya nya' and hoping your problems go away. They didn't.
He's just trying to sell books now. Ignore him.
The lengths we go to hand medical cannabis to the pharma industry...
I mean it's a plant. Throw some seeds in a pot of soil. Done.