218
submitted 7 months ago by nanoUFO to c/games
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 72 points 7 months ago

And some people were annoyed it didn't win game of the year...

[-] [email protected] 56 points 7 months ago

Most average game of the year.
Bethesda hasn't innovated in years, they depend nearly entirely on the name alone

[-] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago
[-] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago

Let us all remember that one time that they thought that monetizing the mods was a good idea and a massive amount of Steam users demolished them online. Like oh you want to make awful games, make that money, then have modders make cool content that makes it worth playing, and then have the balls to ask for a cut of what they’re selling it for?

And guess what? They still do that. And the fallout 76 store and subscription is something I will never forget.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

One of the games of the year!

[-] gravitas_deficiency 19 points 7 months ago

The universe of Elder Scrolls: Spacerim just feels… strangely sparse and uninteresting, even in a lot of the places that should be interesting.

If this came out 5-6 years ago, it’d be a different story, but there’s frankly too many competitors that have done space RPG as good or better than Todd has with his latest entry.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

Some people will worship anything Bethesda puts out, even when it's mid at best

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] VR20X6 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I mean, I actually like the game, but I will say that anyone that thought it deserved GOTY awards is delusional and presumably in a tiny minority to think it. It wasn't even plausible that it would even win best RPG when it came out the same year as Baldur's Gate 3. Starfield may not be a terrible game, but it's definitely not great either. It's thoroughly mediocre.

[-] [email protected] 63 points 7 months ago

Starfield is one of the most bland games ever made. Modders can't fix it or want too. This is not Fallout or Elder Scrolls. We are talking about a new Intellectual Property (IP) and it was sub-bar at release. To make people care and want to mod it. You need give them something good. Bethesda failed at this for Starfield.

Also I tried of "Bethesda release another mid game, but the modders will save it.". Can we stop this. People need to hold them to a higher standard.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago

Anecdotally but this is why I felt there were less interesting fallout 4 mods to me than NV despite there being more of them.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

As I understand it: the main issue with fallout 4 from a modding pov is that they reworked the entire engine twice between FONV and FO4. Once for Skyrim, which made it much easier to make mods, and then again for FO4 which made modding some things much harder, if not impossible without workarounds.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

At the end of the day, people don't want to work really hard to polish a turd when they could be working on improving a flawed gem instead. New Vegas has much better meat on it's bones even if it's the same bones as 3 and 4. Starfield is like someone put a bunch of unflavored tofu on all those bones and tried to sell it as premium ribs.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago
[-] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago

Modders will fix it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] starman2112 58 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I still don't get why my parents couldn't come to my wedding

Or why my parents are UC citizens despite me having a Freestar background

Or why my parents aren't religious despite me having the Enlightened background

Or why my parents seem to exist just to give me grandma's UC marine armor (but we're Freestar?????) and an ass terrible ship my dad won in a poker game

[-] Saledovil 22 points 7 months ago

It's a typical sign that the game lacks polish.

[-] [email protected] 39 points 7 months ago

I don't think making the parents Polish will help anything.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

Every game needs more Polish

[-] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago

Cyberpunk 2077 had a ton of Polish and look how it was at launch.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 43 points 7 months ago

Got it for free with my GPU. still feel ripped off. its just so incredible boring.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago

Makes you wonder what they spent all that development time doing? It's not like they had to reinvent the wheel and make an all new engine.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

I've sunk more time into it than it deserves and I think maybe 50% of the content that feels unfinished or half baked might have been gutted. It feels like there was more there at one point and it got hacked off and spackled over.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

Same. I got two copies, actually. One with my CPU and the other with my GPU. My daughter and I both lost interest after the first day when I asked her last week if she had played it at all.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago

Im just sitting here wondering how anyone thought this was going to be good in the first place. Every bit of trailer or gameplay footage has made me meh from day one. "Looks like skyrim but in space" ive played skyrim.... to death.... changing the theme to space isnt exiting. Its cheap.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

When I first heard about it I was excited and then I looked it up and realized it's a Bethesda game. So then I thought, Yeah I don't trust them I think I'll leave it.

They will keep doing this as long as people put up with the fact that they make crap half the time. Don't pre-order stuff just wait until it comes out and if it's good buy it otherwise no.

It's their problem that they are on a 20 year old game engine and refuse to use something more modern, and it's also their problem they don't have a quality control department. Why do we have to suffer for their mistakes?

[-] Dups 7 points 7 months ago

I haven't pre-ordered a game since 2011. They aren't usually playable for a few weeks at least after launch anyway. The trend is becoming a year or two wait for games to get to the state promised pre-launch. By then they are heavily discounted or in some cases free to play. Just a way better deal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

It looked like a mix of Fallout 4, and No Man's Sky.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CancerMancer 7 points 7 months ago

I never got the Starfield hype either, Bethesda lost their touch years ago and proc gen rarely makes things good. I suspected it would be very average like other Bethesda games and it was.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Good!

The worse the reviews, the faster the price will fall. Looking forward to playing this one when It drops from console price to PC game price.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

In my opinion, it isn't even worth your time to play it, even if it's free. It's just bland. There are games that do interesting things, but Starfield was so safe and boring.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

you could just borrow it off the internet

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's an ok game.

Had a few plot points in the UC quest line that were cool. I liked that zero g casino fight.

Inventory management was shit, but that's pretty common to the creater.

Base building didn't really interest me in Fallout 4, and didn't do much for me here either. The crafting was weird. I don't like using my combat feats to make better sandwiches.

The ship customization was cool, but since you are just jumping to your destination it didn't matter much for my playthrough.

The proc gen planets were predictably empty feeling. I was worried about that after they said they were putting 1000 in. No way they could hand generate enough content to fill that, which was their strength in The Elder Scrolls.

I suspect they got caught up in the No Man's Sky hype and forgot to use their core strengths. Combine this with not enough innovation on their weaknesses and it was mid.

If they would have done an Expanse scale game, set within our solar system, where you had 2 large terrestrial planets, a number of asteroid bases, and kept their scale in check they may have been able to pull it off. But it felt just too stretched out.

I think that 7/10 review guy was right.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago

Base building and space ship building has definitely evolved!

Unfortunately, there's ZERO REASON to do any of it.

Even worse, newgame+, which IS required for the full Starfield experience, wipes all of your creations. What a incredibly mind boggling game decision.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago

I put it down after 25 hours a couple months ago and keep forgetting about it. The thought of moving inventory between my pack, the ship, and that box in the ...what's that building called where the group you joined live? I can't even remember what I was doing, or who that group was. I just can't inventory anymore.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

You can prolly do the classic Bethesda "console command max carrying capacity and ignore inventory management at every turn" maneuver

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago

Not surprised. It's OK. Played 40 hours and then got bored. Haven't touched it since. No real incentive to go back to it.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago

This game reminded me of how awesome no man's sky is and how I'd rather just play that. Curious if they will make a second after that horrible launch?

[-] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Man just take starfields art direction, fps combat, and NPCs (no man's sky's NPCs are too dull.) mixed into no man's sky and i'd be thrilled!! I hate the "cartoony" style, extra vibrant colors of NMS and the gunplay is absolutely atrocious, but swap that with starfield and you'd have a real gem.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

I liked it. the problem is I feel very little temptation to play it again. it's not a bad game to be frank, but it's not a genre defining game either and obviously a lot of people are dissapointed with that.

I'll get in again once DLC drops and some good mod work is done. but for now I think the 100 hours I spent were fine, but enough at this point

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
218 points (92.9% liked)

Games

15879 readers
1271 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS