A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
Good. Tying aid to cuts in IRS funding was absolutely asinine. Failing to fund Ukraine, which is actually fighting for it's continued existence as a political entity is also asinine.
Yes, Hamas is a horrible organization; but, the Israeli Government isn't facing an existential threat and has not been an innocent actor in the situation in Gaza. Aid and support should come with strings attached to ensure the protection of civilians and property rights of the people being displaced.
Fully agree, but have to add:
Most of the aid to Ukraine is actually just money for the US defense industry and military. They get to donate old stuff without paying for disposal and get money to build new staff.
The ROI on supporting Ukraine is huge. The US is eliminating their second biggest threat without sacrificing a single soldier and only at the cost of donating old equipment.
Israel, on the other hand, is more of a leech on the USA. They don't provide much benefit and they cost a lot of money and soft power. Unlike Ukraine, they have a powerful lobbying group to get out much more from the USA than would ever be warranted if they didn't hijack US domestic politics.
I think you misunderstand Isreals role in the region, as far as US politics is concerned. As long as Isreal is a viable force in the region, They are seen as a knife at the collective Arab/Iranian/Egyptian throat. They act as a US proxy providing a counter weight to other regional powers. I'm no defender of Isreal, there actions, or Netanyahu, just providing another point of view.
I know that argument, but then you must also accept that acts like 9/11 are blowback and forever wars like Iraq, Afghanistan and ISIS are inevitable.
The American people do not profit of off this modern colonialism.
Just trading peacefully with the Muslim world would be cheaper and cost less blood.
“Israel is the largest American aircraft carrier in the world that cannot be sunk, does not carry even one American soldier, and is located in a critical region for American national security.”
— Alexander Haig
Like it or not, it's as true then as it is now.
Israel has a VERY strong military industrial complex and the US is a long time collaborator and customer. It is far from a "leech" scenario.
Also, don't forget that we are getting immense amounts of research and testing in Ukraine. A LOT of our gear has never been (meaningfully) used in anger. That, combined with the reality of a modern war against near-ish peers makes those "aid packages" worth their weight in gold. The paper and the envelopes, not the crates full of javelins.
Israel keeps the whole region unstable. That's an immeasurable benefit to US oil interests.
Saudi Arabia and Yemen, the Syrian war, Islamic state.
Israel certainly is adding to the instability, but the region is pretty unstable without considering them.
Tying aid to cuts in IRS funding was absolutely asinine.
Republicans will run ads saying that Democrats refused to support Israel and Democrats will mumble about the violation of parliamentary principles. Then voters will ignore the whole thing and vote exclusively on how they feel about abortion.
The average voter doesn't pay attention so you're right.
They fixate on what's presented the loudest, because that's the news most readily available to them.
Also, I won't lie, I've had a lot of personal drama around women's health in my own life. I'm a Texas resident who knows quite a few women who have miscarried or needed to terminate their pregnancy in the last ten years. I don't know what any of them are expected to do over the next ten years. But I do know that my sister has told me straight up "I can't move back to Texas to be with the family, because I want to have more kids".
Why would wanting to have more kids discourage you from moving back to Texas? Because she's at a high risk of miscarriage. And if she miscarries, there's a real possibility that the local hospital will let her bleed out in the ER before they risk the liability of performing a life-saving operation.
I can't ignore that impact on my immediate family, even as I recognize the shitty attempts by politicians to make Israel/Ukraine into a cash grab for their donor bases. All that becomes - for better or worse - a secondary concern beside the fact that my sister doesn't feel safe living in Texas while pregnant.
I'm sure I'm not alone in this regard.
Tying aid to cuts in IRS funding was absolutely asinine.
Not really, at least in their minds.
It jives with party dogma, depresses audits and therefore, donors win big (which fills campaign war chests).
Perfectly sensible by those metrics. /s
agreed.
In fairness, yes. If we consider the perspective of the GOP as a legitimate attempt to balance budgets, tying foreign aid to cuts elsewhere in spending makes sense. Then reality shows up, taps us on the shoulder and we quickly discover that the GOP's views on "balanced budgets" is actually just a smoke screen for "cut stuff we don't like" and the whole argument falls apart.
So ya, sticking with the "asinine" descriptor.
well you can also balance budgets by raising taxes or even just collecting income, investment, and corporate taxes equally and having tiers that don't cap at six figures.
BUT THAT'S SOCIALISM!!!11!1one!1!
/s in case it wasn't blindingly obvious.
In seriousness, just rolling back the Bush era tax cuts would provide a huge boost to Federal Government revenue. There are a lot of other possible options, as well, which could raise revenue. But, the GOP never met a tax cut they didn't like and a tax increase they didn't hate.
Balancing the budget implies funding the IRS. Very few government investments have a higher return than tax audits.
The headline makes it sound as if Democrats are widely opposing Israeli funding and supporting Ukrainian funding and blocking it on those grounds. It seems as if it’s really the IRS defunding that they are blocking it on, and the war funding is largely incidental. I had a brief moment of hope that morals prevailed over the American war machine.
I hate those omnibus bills, we have them too in Canada, it's completely ridiculous and undemocratic.
The bill also contained provisions to cut funding for the IRS so rich tax cheats could get away with it. Everyone knew the bill would fail. It was theater on the part of the House Republicans, who passed the bill to the Dem controlled Senate.
In surprise to no one, the DOA bill is DOA.
The current GOP plan (which looks a lot like historical GOP plans) is to put up bills full of poisoned pills and then blame Democrats for refusing to pass them. Their donors get to spend a billion dollars on ads saying how Democrats are hypocrits. Cable news / national papers will do a bunch of "Both sides!" view-from-nowhere stories that wax nostalgic about bipartisanship. Mike Johnson will premier a NYT Bestselling book "Jesus Save America", in which he advocates all liberals be subject to a state-financed exorcism. Fetterman will personally grab up and break a Palestinian migrant over his knee to prove how much the Senate supports Israel. The Government will shut down.
And, after six months of people screaming about how Social Security checks are not going out any minute now, you'll be surprised to find out how much of this DOA bill gets included in the compromise they eventually settle on.
Can we please investigate these fucking Republicans for corrupt ties to Russia??
👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
This is the best summary I could come up with:
WASHINGTON, Nov 7 (Reuters) - U.S. Senate Democrats on Tuesday blocked a Republican effort to win quick approval for a bill providing emergency aid to Israel that passed the House of Representatives last week, but that provides no assistance for Ukraine's war against Russia.
Democrats objected, stressing the importance of providing aid to Ukraine as well as Israel, in addition to humanitarian aid, border security funding and money to push back against China in the Indo-Pacific that was in a $106 billion funding request President Joe Biden sent to Congress last month.
They also accused House Republicans of playing politics with the crisis in Israel, delaying aid for the Jewish State by tying support to cutting funding for the Internal Revenue Service, a favorite target for Republicans, rather than writing a bipartisan bill.
The House bill would provide $14.3 billion for Israel as it responds to a deadly Oct. 7 attack by Islamist Hamas militants, but also cut the same amount of money from the IRS.
The funds would include $4 billion for procurement of Israel's Iron Dome and David's Sling defense systems to counter short-range rocket threats as well as some transfers of equipment from U.S. stocks.
Senate leaders are writing their own supplemental funding bill and hope to introduce it as soon as this week.
The original article contains 348 words, the summary contains 217 words. Saved 38%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!