this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
44 points (92.3% liked)

Android

27282 readers
88 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

[email protected]


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Does anyone know of a good privacy respecting (preferably FOSS) parental control app for Android? I'm trying to convince a friend to get a Pixel with GrapheneOS as their kids next phone but they won't do it unless it let's them control certain things.

They're used to iOS where apparently their kid can request to download an app and they can remotely allow the installation. They can also add screen time beyond the original set limit if the kids requests it.

Unfortunately, I don't think they'd be open to switching if it means losing their parental controls.

all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sorry, this won't answer your question, but I would just let them use what they want. Unless they were interested in it originally, they will just resent you if anything goes wrong or if they have any trouble.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The thing is, the kid has started realizing the data collection that's going on and it's interested in switching. That's the only reason I'm genuinely pursuing this.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Okay, that makes much more sense if it's the kid's initiative.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Yeah they were talking about a game and then started getting ads for that game. Classic start to the story lol

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  1. Yes I know that's way too old to be putting parental controls on their phone.
[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I disagree. A human Brain is fully grown by the age of 22.

Until then it is the parents duty to make sure they don't get addicted to anything, including phones.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So you think that parental controls should be in place until the age of 22?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It's difficult to generalize, but at least screentime-monitoring should be, so parents can find out if their child is addicted

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Counterpoint: a 22-year-old has been a legal adult for 4 years in basically every western country, is allowed to drink alcohol, and can join the military.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yeah, but those aren't based on scientific data.

We do a lot of stupid shit simply because it's always been that way, when there are options that make more sense according to scientific data. Letting a 18yrs old join a deadly job is not responsible.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Same reason I try to get my GF to ditch her iPhone.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Not my kid but yeah.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago

Privacy is incompatible with parental control. I can't help without going against my values, sorry.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I've found it to have severe impact on battery life; always eating CPU cycles.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

That may be! Hm, but it works 💁‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Graphene would allow them to create a non-owner profile with no APP store. That way, their kids wouldn't be able to install anything and the parent could install apps in the owner profile and then permit the kid to use it.

Screen time and such would not be configurable though I think.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Família link (which does all that and more) won't work unless it has privileged access. Life360 is even worse than google, so no talking about that. I don't know what to say, if he's just into location stalking; then you can just use google maps to share the location, but elsewhere, you'll need to find some trustworthy MDM service.