this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
667 points (95.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

5153 readers
1987 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

karcatgirl-vantas:

the default way for things to taste is good. we know this because "tasty" means something tastes good. conversely, from the words "smelly" and "noisy" we can conclude that the default way for things to smell and sound is bad. interestingly there are no corresponding adjectives for the senses of sight and touch. the inescapable conclusion is that the most ordinary object possible is invisible and intangible, produces a hideous cacophony, smells terrible, but tastes delicious. and yet this description matches no object or phenomenon known to science or human experience. so what the fuck

skluug:

this is what ancient greek philosophy is like

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 63 points 10 months ago (3 children)

sightly is a thing... Something that looks good.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago (4 children)

And touchy is a thing, it touches back, so it’s something that looks good, can touch you back, smells bad, is loud, but tastes yummy…

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago

Or it gets really defensive when you ask if personal questions

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

We also say someone is a “looker” when they’re hot. And that things are “touchy.” though the latter is often used figuratively, it can be and definitely is used literally.

Also cows smell terrible, make a ton of awful noise, but taste delicious.

This post is just shitty, misinformed pontification. It’s definitely not anything close to philosophy.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I mean, the description of shitty misinformed pontification describes a pretty good chunk of Greek and roman philosophy. Have you read a lot of Aristotle?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

But, something can look so aweful you cannot avert your eyes of it. Like a stereotypical car accident.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (12 children)

This is very much "I am 14 and this is deep" territory.

Adjectives describe. By using them, we are emphasising a quality of a given thing. That does not make it the "default state" (a problematic concept) of that object, even if it is a desirable quality.

The "default state" of food is that it is edible, ie. that it can be eaten, as food is defined as that which is edible.

there are no corresponding adjectives for the senses of sight and touch

Visible. Tactile.

Noisy

Even by OPs logic, "noise" is not one of the senses. Audible is the correct word here.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_universals

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

The punchline is the comment about how the OP is like Green philosophy.

You're picking apart the setup, not the punchline, and therefore being "that guy" who ruins the joke.

Stop it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

... All the comments. They're all missing the point that some Greek philosophy and classical rhetoric is indeed like this. This is where I'm pretty arm's length with some schools of thought; it sometimes all seems constructed on some dubious first principles, or leaps of logic.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Why can the replier in the screenshot poke fun at the nonsensical nature of the first post but not us in the comments?

How does that ruin the joke for you?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (3 children)

If you think the original poster was even remotely serious you need to take a break and expose yourself to... Idk, Conversation? More comedy? Media literacy lessons?

If this was your attempt at comedy, drop the first sentence and be more belligerent in your indignation.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

In your philosophical knowledge, is there a need for a iam14andthisisdeep community? I pretty much think that the sum of a determined number of children make up of a real adult.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Exactly, and on top of that this only works in English and only in dialects where these words are used that way.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The default touch verb is bad, because nobody has ever used the word "touchy" to mean something good.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And "sightly" isn't as common as "unsightly", so the default sight verb is bad.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Smells bad, something you do not want to hear, do not want to touch and do not want to see. But tastes good. Don't anyone say it's shit or ill slap you.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 10 months ago (6 children)

When you say someone is a real looker, it means they're attractive, so I'd say the default state for sight is appealing.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

Very sightly

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

Good point. Also, there's touchy feely so the most ordinary thing seems to be a loud, stinking and attractive creep with strawberry lipstick or something. 🤔

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You also say they're "hot," which suggests that your eyes have the capability to gauge temperature.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

Which they do, by the means of black body radiation.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

My thesis brings all the boys to the forum.

And they're like, "This makes us a quorum."

Damn right, this makes us a quorum.

I could teach them but I might just bore 'em.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Basing life philosophy on English grammar...lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But there are words for those two thing, even if they're not used commonly.

Sightly is something that is pleasant to the eye. Sure, it's inverse "unsightly" is more commonly used today, but it is still a word.

While not mainly used to refer to the sense anymore, Touchy can refer to a body part that is acutely sensitive or irritable.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

A loud, irritable, bad-smelling thing, that is nonetheless beautiful and delicious.

A firework.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Farts must be delicious 🤤

[–] jballs 3 points 10 months ago

OP out here acting like no one's ever tongue-punched a fart-box.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You're definitely describing a fart.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

tastes delicious

Uhhhhh...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

I'm no good at remembering itemized lists ^^'

[–] Peppycito 8 points 10 months ago

He's totally describing chickens. Aside from the invisible part.

[–] porkins 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The person is not wrong about Greek Philosophy. Have been reading some of Plato’s works and he does have a bit of an absolutist way of presenting things that sometimes fails to address the nuance. The things that he is right about though transcend time and are eerily relevant to our current circumstances, so his thoughts on him an nature tend towards accurate. On this example, Plato would probably script Socrates explaining to Glaucon, and indeed does, that vision is tied to brightness and darkness and that somewhere in the middle is where you’d want to be because brightness is brought by the sun, which is hot, but you can be tool dark and cold in a cave. He’s then be ADHD and explain that the cave is a metaphor for our knowledge and since light lets us read, we lack much knowledge when being in the dark. Glaucon would then quip that people can still talk in a dark cave and that their voice might even be echoed and Socrates would probably say that without the warmth from light, the soul won’t listen to the loudest voice. It goes something like that.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Screaming invisible cheese?

A gas being forced through a pipe that's smelly yet sweet-tasting?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Evaporated durian juice

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why do we park on a driveway and drive on parkway?!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Shipments go by land and cargo goes on ships...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It does match one phenomenon. Survival. Noise is important for listening for predators, smell let's you know if potential food is rotted and our sense of taste helps us distinguish between calorie dense food (sweet), salts and micronutrients (salty), acidic foods (sour), poisons (bitter) and protein (umami).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Survival

Why did I read that in Agent Smith's voice?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Fuzzy and pretty...default object I propose is within the fungi family of life.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Bro forgot disgusting

load more comments
view more: next ›