this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
798 points (98.7% liked)

politics

18651 readers
3799 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 61 points 10 months ago (3 children)

🚨ℙ𝕚𝕤𝕤 𝕋𝕒𝕡𝕖 𝕚𝕤 ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝🚨

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Wasn't there the theory that he was so friendly with Putin because they have video footage of him getting peed on by Moscow hookers?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, it was him watching Moscow hookers pissing on a bed in the presidential suite of a hotel, with a previous resident of that room being Obama. It's been a while since I thought about the piss tape.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

First I'm hearing. Hopefully the last too 😐

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Don’t we all?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nothing in this article mentioned that. Unless I missed it too.

So this is just some guy on the Internet spewing bs at this point.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Wasn't there like a testimony from an FBI guy about the pee tapes or something though? I think there was no hard evidence, but the pee tapes at least have to some plausibility.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

The rumour was that Russia had a video of him getting peed on by prostitutes in Sweden or something. Russia likes to motivate with sticks, even when they dangle a carrot, so if (hah) Russia were involved it stands to reason they'd have something to leverage him with.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

To the surprise of absolutely nobody who's not in the cult.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

"Robert E. Peetapes" is back on the menu, boys.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

The shittier version of David s pumpkins. Tis the season I guess.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

now here is a REAL PATRIOT 🫡

[–] [email protected] 58 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Please staffers, please tea on me. I'm just here, waiting, wide open for your tea.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

soooo hottt and steamyyy

[–] [email protected] 42 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Congratulations to Jessica Denson!

This has been years in the making. We're going to see a shitload more reports (and books) of how incredibly fucked the entire campaigns and administration was under that orange fuckwit.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

GOOD. No way NDAs should even be a thing for something like this.