511
I like Python def (lemmy.world)
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 80 points 9 months ago

Ewww default exports. Explicit named exports are better! And so it begins

[-] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago

How very dare you share my opinion!

[-] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

PascalCase default exports for Classes

camelCase named exports for functions

ALL_CAPS named exports for constants

[-] [email protected] 41 points 9 months ago
[-] [email protected] 33 points 9 months ago

How about some fn instead?

[-] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
pub async fn foo() -> Pin>>>>>

oh fuck commonmark cant display the syntax :( well anyone who has done async rust can imagine

[-] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

p a f fn(){}

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago

these puns are getting funcy

[-] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Chef's kiss ๐Ÿ‘Œ

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sbv 26 points 9 months ago

fun is the punchable face of keywords. I don't know why, but I hate it.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago

Oh, you're no fun.

^I'll see myself out.^

[-] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

For me it's friend

[-] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

I prefer good old def

[-] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

How about some (defun)?

[-] darcy 5 points 9 months ago

better than function

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] boletus 38 points 9 months ago

Python is fine as a language I guess

But python programmers give it a bad name. I've never seen "well written" python code, it's always shit that's been thrown together cos it works.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago

I use python exclusively when I want to quickly throw some shit together that nobody's ever gonna spend any time maintaining, so that tracks.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago

It badly needs strong typing. And braces.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

Doesn't Python 3 have types? I've seen a few well typed codebases and it really made the code much easier to understand. Or is it just that it's not checking them strongly enough?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

The type annotations are just fancy comments. They do not do anything at runtime. If you have a function that takes an int someone can still pass in a list or anything else.

[-] boletus 3 points 9 months ago

The main advantage of typing for me is static linting.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] funkless_eck 4 points 9 months ago

just put int_ or str_ in front of your variables

problem solved ๐Ÿ˜Œ

[-] boletus 4 points 9 months ago

I think python is good as it is for what it can do, mostly because I have no reason to use it.

What we need is lua with types!

[-] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Have you heard of Typescript-to-lua? I used to do Dota modding (which is in lua) with TSTL and it works great!

You write TS code (using Typescript syntax that includes types) and it is compiled into lua.

Wonder if that could be an alternative that can work for you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago

When the grey beards wake up they're going to be fuming

load more comments
view more: next โ€บ
this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
511 points (92.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

31326 readers
20 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS