this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
1133 points (97.7% liked)

Ukraine

8312 readers
610 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW

Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam
  6. No content against Finnish law

Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 337 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Yet he’s taking DoD money for Starlink in Ukraine. At what point do his antics turn from the craziness of a billionaire to espionage and being deemed a Russian asset?

[–] [email protected] 133 points 1 year ago (29 children)

Musk openly stated that he spoke directly with Putin after the Ukraine invasion had started. The super wealthy have no loyalties and will sell anyone and anything to the highest bidder. I've said it before, every penny after $1 billion needs to be taxed at 100%. Time to reign in the oligarchs.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But then who would create the underpaying jobs?!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
[–] [email protected] 91 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Imagine if Lockheed martin "shut off" a jet because it was "getting too close to China"

What would be the response by the DOJ?

I would think the military would call that an act of treason and imprison or disappear any executives they thought were involved

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 76 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It would be hilarious for the US and/or the EU freeze his assets and punch his market influence to the ground if they accuse him of espionage.

[–] [email protected] 101 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nationalizing the satellites that we paid for as a national security asset sure seems reasonable here, seeing as he likely broke a contract when he disabled them.

Imagine if Lockheed disabled an allied F16's targeting computer during a mission; there would be hell to pay.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've said in the past that something was clearly wrong when he bought Twitter. His behavior was far too targeted. It's all way too obvious.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 178 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The spin at the end is just fluffy bullshit. Starlink, from the get go, has had bandwidth reserved for military operations albeit US military operation but military operations nonetheless. The real question here is how and why did he know that operation was happening and what other operations has he known about/thwarted/or knowingly or unknowingly passed along information about.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe the same FSB agents that were driving his paranoia. Assuming they knew about the attack, they could get a bigger win by stopping it and removing Starlink from the equation at the same time, than by stopping the attack with military means.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

Definitely. He used terms such as "Lenin's mistake" when talking about Ukraine which is rather specific to Russian nationalist ideology. You don't stumble across such a thing by accident.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 146 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

“How am I in this war?” Musk asks Isaacson. “Starlink was not meant to be involved in wars. It was so people can watch Netflix and chill and get online for school and do good peaceful things, not drone strikes.”

Musk, transparent as ever, makes sure to tell his biographer that it's about peace, man, and has nothing to do with his love of authoritarian regimes.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 year ago

Nothing more peaceful than supporting an authoritarian war criminal 🥰

[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 year ago

“How am I in this war?”

Bitch, you put yourself there!

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And a shit eating little shoe-horn of the phrase "Netflix and chill".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Didn't his company supply a bunch of Starlinks because of the war? Was he expecting Ukranians needed to watch more Netflix and do more school stuff while getting bombed out by the Ruzzians? What a crock

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 118 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Musk was reportedly motivated to foil the attack out of concern that a strike on Crimea would constitute a “mini-Pearl Harbor” and lead to Russia retaliating with nuclear weapons

So glad the blue-checks get to dictate our foreign policy now.

What was all that DoD money for? A suggestion box?

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Not like Russia invading Ukraine was a mini pearl harbor, nooooooo not that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 92 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Isn't it illegal to screw with the military actions of the U.S. ... and its allies?!!?

[–] cantstopthesignal 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I don't think what he did was illegal per se, but he is definitely positioning himself against US geopolitical interests, which is a really bad idea if you are a US citizen, living in the United States. If he were to give away any military secrets that pass through star link, which I'm sure Russia will inevitably ask him to do, he will get arrested for espionage. He should tread very carefully.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 83 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why are enemies of the United States allowed to own national security infrastructure?

[–] [email protected] 87 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They are allowed to be president and run for re-election too so I wouldn't hold my breath

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wollang 59 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Took longer than I thought it would for Musk to do this. Been waiting for it since he threw his little fit about starlink in Ukraine was costing him money.

Then he said he’s talked to Putin directly.

Seriously someone reign this dude in, somehow, before he really fucks shit up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 year ago (2 children)

this is starting to give comic book villan

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Arrest this treasonous scumbag. Slava Ukraini!

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (8 children)

As much as I despise Musk for being a total piece of shit, this isn't treason. Technically, we aren't even allies with Ukraine. The argument could certainly be made that this works against the interests of the United States, but that alone isn't treason because it isn't a crime for citizens to oppose the US, especially when it's private property the US is being lent. Because at that time, the US hadn't signed a contract with Musk yet.

If he did this again, then it would be a breach of contract, but still wouldn't be treason. People being charged with treason is very rare, because it's a such a high bar to meet.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This guy aided the Kremlin. He's helping russians in their genocide of Ukrainian children. Fuck that pile of shit and lock him up.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (16 children)

I agree. I'm just saying, he's not guilty of treason.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago

As if I needed another reason to hate this piece of shit.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If I was Ukrainian, I would say that makes Elon a combatant.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Traitor to Democracy, at it's worst. I see he wants to join Lex Luthor at Amazon. What's the closest villian comparison for someone like Elmo?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago

OP linked to a site that regosted half of the original article, so here's the full one:

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/politics/elon-musk-biography-walter-isaacson-ukraine-starlink/index.html

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Fuuuuuuck Elon Musk

ETA: he said he did it to avoid a nuclear attack. Everybody with two brain cells to rub together knows this is an empty threat from Putin, so either Elon is an idiot or he’s lying.

Likely both.

[–] Corkyskog 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Glad a billionaire gets to dictate US foreign policy on his whim. How is this not treason? How is he not being dragged in front of Congress as we speak?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Not that I expect a single damn thing to happen, but isn't this the definition of treason?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Man the old geezers really think they still have absolute control over everything and don't realize the ultra wealthy they have enabled are getting and have been operating far beyond the control of the western governments.

God the fucking narcissism of those in charge to think that they still rule with perfect wisdom. I'm waiting for when these companies that the US built leave and take up residence with new hot authoritarian countries and leave misery poverty in their wake.

Singular rich people should not have this much say.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›