this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
1618 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2212 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hoshikarakitaridia 256 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Can we say the obvious for a second?

Good decision. Everyone needs to be able to see this. It's important, especially in this climate.

[–] [email protected] 82 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Something this important, we all need to witness, no matter which way the verdict goes.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Except the people that need to watch it are going to refuse and call it corruption. And still have extremely strong, unmoveable, opinions about it.

Same as the Jan 6th hearing

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They'll get their out of context and misleading soundbites from the right wind media overlords, which will only reinforce their blind faith in their lord and savior trump.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 185 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Anyone a big enough drunk to take a shot every time Trump, himself, tries to object?

[–] [email protected] 89 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you want to give everyone alcohol poisoning?!

[–] ExRedditor1928 33 points 1 year ago

I think drinking that many shot glasses of water would kill you, honestly

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (4 children)

What if you take a drink every time he tries to object to his own defense? I'm pretty sure taking a shot when he objects to anything would kill even the most experienced alcoholic.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe he'll just do like what he did in the debate with Hillary: "Wrong."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (4 children)

"ERECTIONJECTION YOUR JUDGESHIP! somethingsomethingorangewordsalad" - Trump

/sigh

Wait, does that even count?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 104 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They should add some twitch integration too, 10,000 bits and the defendant has to floss.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 88 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fawx News: "Now back to continuing coverage of paint drying. Make sure to stay tuned because we have Hunter Bidens dick pics as well! Laptop! Biden Crime Family! NO! DO NOT TOUCH THAT DIAL! NOOOOOOOO!!!"

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

BENGHAAAAAAAZI! EEEEEEEEMAIL!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 82 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I hope he suddenly goes all sovereign citizen and handles his own defense.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 year ago (3 children)

He should. After all, doesn't he know more about the law than anyone? And he's a stable genius too. Sounds like he should save the money he'd spend on his lawyers and just handle his own defense. I'm sure he'd win easily in court, right? (Barely manages to contain laughter)

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 74 points 1 year ago (24 children)

Sadly this will only be watched as justice porn for the left, the right won't even care.

[–] [email protected] 85 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyone likes justice porn in America. The OJ trial was one of the most watched TV events in history at the time.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Well it's about to be topped.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I don't know about that. An awful lot of conservatives are bending over backwards to explain why Trump was justified in breaking the law multiple times. They certainly do care, and some people have even died over it. Remember the guy who tried to go after the FBIfield office in Cincinnati, OH?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This should 100% be televised. This affects us all. This was the attempted overthrow of our democracy and justice should not be hidden.

There is way more benefit then problem with this IMHO.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m wholeheartedly behind the WGA & SGA, but god bless Georgia for coming in clutch with content over the next year plus.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Wonder what sponsors they’ll have… Will the judge ask us to smash the like button?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency 64 points 1 year ago

Out-fucking-standing. I am absolutely going to watch this. It’ll be the first Trump footage I’ve voluntarily watched in quite a while.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So we're clear, this is not the revolution

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago

The revolution will be monetized

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It’s the opposite. It’s the last defense of our current form of government.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

I am not going to watch any of that.

When he was on the NPR news cycle five times a day I started yelling and cursing uncontrollably to the point where I was diving at the radio to turn it off or change the station so that I would not freak the fuck out.

It doesn't matter where Trump is. I don't want to be there. It is a defilement to view him.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Practice stoicism my friend. Ppl on the left freaking out is exactly what they want. Treat trump and the gop the same way you treat clowns...laugh at them.
It's the thing they fear the most...loss of narrative.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago (13 children)

My word, that is delicious.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Free media coverage of anything Trump does tends to boost Trump's popularity, even if a normal person would see it as stupid or embarrassing. So I'm in two minds about this.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wonder what Fox will find to run instead.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We now go live to San Francisco where a homeless person is probably gay and Hispanic.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (22 children)

This is going to backfire in a big way. Whole lot of people seem to think this will be justice porn or somehow convince his base of his criminality but it is going to do no such thing. According to one poll, the majority (77%) of likely GOP primary voters are already convinced the trial is "politically motivated", with only 8% more concerned about him attempting to overturn an election. You can take a look at some polling here, there are other even more troublesome results as well: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-poll-indictments-2023-08-20/

No matter how awful, contradictory, and ridiculous he will be in that court room, this is likely going to be a massive boon for Trump, and his followers are going to see it as the realization of their own fears of persecution. This man is an ascendant fascist leader, not the sad sack finally facing consequences that liberals so desperately want him to be, and the effect this will have on mobilizing his base to continue to escalate will be immense. These people do not give a single fuck about """law and order""" no matter how much they pretend they do, stop assuming they will just accept things when he is found guilty. They won't.

I'm just trying to help people realize how dangerous and precarious this whole situation is. People were laughing and making jokes when he first announced his candidacy, and kept on doing it right up to the point that he won the election. Don't make the same mistake again, because while yall are cracking jokes, him and his ghouls are hurting people. They are passing discriminatory laws, they are in the supreme court setting dangerous precedents and overturning inconvenient ones, and they are patrolling the streets looking for people to brutalize and throw in jail. They are committing hate crimes and becoming increasingly radicalized and mobilized.

Stop pretending this is entertainment or business as usual, it's not. I'm begging you to understand that the fascists are already here, and the longer they're underestimated the better their chances of seizing control.

[–] [email protected] 75 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

This is going to backfire.

First of all, never try to get inside a conservative's head if you are going to come out with a loser defeatism attitude. 2nd, Convicted Sex Offender Treason Trump will not have any control of the trial at all.

of likely GOP primary voters are already convinced the trial is "politically motivated"

That is the most important reason why the trial needs to be televised.

Stop pretending this is entertainment or business as usual, it's not.

Another reason why it is absolutely critical to have the trial televised. I can remember the Watergate TV hearings and the entire country was riveted by the seriousness of the proceedings. The Jan 6 House committee televised hearing were also riveting for everybody who watched them in full. It will be like that only with everyone watching. The very reason for televising the proceedings is so that everybody understands the seriousness.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Remember that Onion headline "man would die fighting to defend what he imagines the Constitution to be"?

Many modern conservatives are like that. They will bleat all day about laws, and yet have never spent 2 minutes even reading a Wikipedia page about them.

They'll believe whatever pundits tell them to believe.

Witch hunt? Unconstitutional? Politically motivated? Kangaroo court?

Not for one minute will any of those law and order loving, institution-protecting, facts not feelings, crowd consider that Trump is there because of real actual crimes he really did commit.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (7 children)

How can they actually get jurors for this?

If the facts require the jurors to convict, there is no chance that this won't ruin their lives (if not significantly shorten them). Even before then, it's going to be a problem. His supporters have already declared and demonstrated that they are willing to use violence.

Thank you, but I'd sit in jail as long as necessary to not be on any of these juries.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (4 children)

How do you even find an impartial jury? I might be wrong but I was almost certain that an impartial jury is required to convict, which is why they always ask you about potential conflicts of interest when you attend jury duty. How many impartial jurors can there be at this point? Tbh, I'm not even sure I would trust an impartial jury with this case. To me, if you're claiming to be impartial then you're either lying, or you give zero fucks about politics and the people around you. Being impartial in this context has some really concerning implications about you.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Am I biased? Fucking absolutely and I hope he's found guilty.

Can I set aside my bias and only consider the evidence as presented? Also fucking absolutely.

There are plenty of people who care enough about the rule of law that would let a man they hate walk free. If you can't, perhaps you should be more concerned with yourself than the implications you ascribe to others who don't deserve it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Advertising revenue will clear the national debt

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Try a clown, expect a circus

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)

INVEST BIG TIME IN POPCORN MARKET, PROFIT MARGINS ARE GOING TO POP POP POP.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I hope the writers are not on strike by then. Late night careers will be made from this.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Is this a new trend? like Johnny depp and Amber heard !? twitch ttv would melt if they added a 'court room' tab

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›