this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
189 points (98.5% liked)

InsanePeopleFacebook

3431 readers
21 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The billing department will.make sure to get this data, if only to evict and foreclose them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago

They'll think the mother and baby are being trafficked

[–] Panamalt 47 points 3 days ago (5 children)

This should work. Healthcare should be a free, no-questions-asked (within reason, obvio) service available to anyone at any time, regardless of who/ what they are.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is the birth of a human child. Healthcare tends to want to protect children, even if the parents do not.

[–] Panamalt 8 points 3 days ago

Which is highly situational and requires the judgment of those trained to make those judgments (aka. child social workers or family therapists), not a blanket policy of requiring invasive and non-medical information from those simply seeking medical care.

In an obviously abusive situation, the abuse is clear enough that it can be addressed in the time it takes to give birth and examine the tiny human. In less obvious abuse cases, the parents can almost certainly make it through the entire visit without raising suspicion, regardless of the information provided (though it might make them easier to identify if the abuse is discovered later). There should be an observation period where nobody gets to go anywhere, but again, that should be limited to only what is medical in nature.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I mean, they would deliver the baby. That's how healthcare generally does work - even in the US - for emergency situations. Only issue is, if you won't answer any questions, they'll probably keep the baby, for a number of arguably good reasons. Human trafficking, for starters.

When you finally sign the forms you need to sign to convince the hospital to let you have the baby, then you will get hit with the horrifying dystopian medical debt. Or you will pay (almost) nothing if you live in any sane society.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sovcits have actually showed up at hospitals before and CAS has gotten involved. One was a sovcit couple who were trying to deliver baby themselves out in the woods in a state park in Kentucky I think; labour stalled after 2 days so they finally came in, and during the admission told the hospital staff they planned to move back into the tent with baby when born, which was during the winter, and refused to get baby a birth certificate or give him a name, so CAS took him and their rights were eventually terminated and baby adopted out. Dad later got arrested at a library for threatening people, and they still have Facebook page demanding his return several years later.

There's also an OB nurse who has a great Tiktok about obstetrical care and birth, and she says she has helped deliver three sovcit moms after they finally gave up trying to deliver unassisted and came in, and two of the babies didn't make it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Since they don't believe in government or any kind of public assist, they should either pay cash or trust their god.

[–] Panamalt 2 points 3 days ago

Or, ya know, be given the same basic respect and rights as any other human being. Personal belief lands under the 'don't ask' category, and should never be used as a factor in medical care unless the patient themselves makes a belief-based request.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It pretty much is that way in the rest of the "free world".

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Ok, try going in to a hospital in Europe and not give them any information, not including even your name or whether you're allergic to anything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago

Well, I was actually replying to a comment and not the main post but fd that up?! You are right though, why wouldn't they want important and pertinent information to make the best choices throughout the procedure?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

It’s possible to have an “anonymous birth”, so mother and baby get medical care, but don’t need to give a name. It is meant for cases where the mother wouldn’t or couldn’t seek help otherwise, e.g. in abusive relationships or family situations.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 days ago (1 children)

To add a note given our own experience, labor and delivery depts tend to be on pretty heavy security around here. We're talking wrist bands for everyone, locked and monitored entries, etc., because people kidnap babies (usually fathers w/o custody or have ill intent). Plus, mistaken indenties happen so you get a matching band with your kid.

They also almost always have post-labor care mandatory since you're practically wheelchair bound after such a traumatic experience. No just walking out of there, you physically can't.

All that is to say, yes, you have to give your name and information and no, you're not just getting a baby to go. They don't exactly want a rando entering and leaving with someone's child, even by accident. You do have some rights though, at least around here, since for some reason we still respect even the craziest of religious rationals (like no meds at all).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

In the UK it's two tags. Baby's like to riggle out. Of them.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago

When we had our kids—in a small country hospital that my mother in law worked for, mind you—we nevertheless had to prove our identity multiple times, and I (the father) was put through extra identity verification—including the go-ahead from my wife—because there are so many liability issues around making sure that the right parents get the right kids. One time we were literally the only couple—and our baby the only baby—on the entire maternity ward and we still had to go through the wristband/umbilical clamp verification process, which included our names.

Sovcit's about to have a really fun time at a hospital.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This reminds me of what a former student is going through. Her boyfriend's parents did home births for all the kids. No birth certificates, no social security cards, no records. Parents just decided last month to up and leave. The 18 year old just got dumped with his siblings, a farm, and no safety net. So the girlfriend and some other friends that just graduated have been working together to care for these kids and run the farm while they work with DHS to figure out how to go forward.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That's sovcit behaviour. Call CAS. Not having identity for your kids will get them taken away.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

Unless they want a whole new mess if/when they ever come back, they need to get those people legally removed as parents.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I don't think the parents are coming back... They gathered up all the cell phones and electronics and destroyed them before they left. The kids are receiving help from the proper agencies.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Call them anyway. They can be sued for child support and charged with child abandonment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

That's completely psychotic

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 days ago

They definitely don't make you fill out any forms, put trackers on you and the baby, and constantly check in over days. I'm sure it's super easy.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

[off topic] There was a science fiction story like that years ago.

The father and mother are told they can't take the kid home until they pay the bill, so they leave her there....

In the end the kid grows up to graduate medical school and gets a job at the same hospital; she pays her bill out of her first week's salary...

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Not from a US perspective:

  • Was able to complete medical school with no money for tuition
  • Medical bill was small enough to be paid in full with one week of new grad salary
  • Was able to defer payment for more than 20 years
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Being forced to pay for your own birth is pretty dystopian.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

I wasn't trying to argue that the premise wasn't dystopian. The point is that the US is currently in many ways even worse. Although I think the parents would be on the hook for the debt in the US, not the child.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

I know, stretching believability a lil too much.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago

Ending spoiler: "YOU CAN'T TELL ME WHICH BABY I CAN TAKE!!!"

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago

At first I was like, well that works for emergencies when you don't have insurance, but I don't think this plan will succeed Then I saw the sovcit part and realized that they're just fucking crazy people.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Would be cool if there was a follow-up post about what happened after this and if the baby survived.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Baby has not arrived yet but I am watching out for it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hospitals are famously casual about things that could get them sued for liability.

/if you need me to tell you, get off the internet. it's fucking sarcasm

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Especially when it comes to newborns!