this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
342 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23551 readers
2942 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

After the Trump administration charged a sitting judge and a sitting mayor in separate cases, a Democratic member of Congress has joined the list.

In recent weeks, the Trump administration has arrested a sitting judge and a sitting mayor, leaving many to wonder whether a member of Congress might soon join the list. Wonder no more.

The acting U.S. attorney for the District of New Jersey, Alina Habba, announced on Monday that her office was charging Rep. LaMonica McIver, D-N.J., with "assaulting, impeding and interfering with law enforcement."

The basic elements of the story are straightforward. Earlier this month, a group of Democratic officials, including three members of Congress, visited Delaney Hall, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility in New Jersey. The point, according to the lawmakers, was to conduct oversight, which is a core congressional responsibility.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 hours ago

If she caves, that sends a message that resistance is over. We have to be willing to go to prison, to make the world aware of what's happening.

[–] [email protected] 97 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Members of Congress have every right to visit facilities like these. The Mayor on the other hand, didn't have the authority, so was asked to leave. But to arrest a sitting Representative is crossing a hard line. They're the ones breaking the law here.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 10 hours ago

I saw the video and that's some bullshit. He was outside the gate in the parking lot. If I'm protesting on the steps in front of the USDA the security guards don't have the authority to cuff me and drag me inside the facility. At best they would detain me outside until the police arrived. They did what they did because it was the scariest thing they thought they could get away with.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 12 hours ago

The mayor refused to leave because he was where they authorized him to wait. And then he did leave.

That arrest is no better.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

They don't care about any laws, they're following the Project2025 playbook to a tee, and are pushing and pushing until they can declare Martial Law in order to enact even more draconian things.

[–] [email protected] 135 points 19 hours ago

After reading about the other lawmakers who also visited that day:

[–] [email protected] 88 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Lets also not forget that this was not a “surprise” oversight visit. I read somewhere, that the mayor Ras Baraka in person handed a letter of intention to conduct an oversight visit a week or two before hand. That part stuck out to me because he hand delivered the notice in person so that there was no uncertainty that they received the letter and to expect his visit.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 12 hours ago

What a coincidence! There is no uncertainty that the Republicans are implementing a fascist dictatorship, and every other American is just ... letting it happen ... too afraid to do what's necessary.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

In the press release announcing the charges, Habba asserted, "No one is above the law — politicians or otherwise."

...and then she went on to praise the honesty, integrity, and strict adherence to the law by the current white house occupant.

[–] anomnom 8 points 10 hours ago

Who the SCOTUS actually put above the law.

[–] Gullible 47 points 19 hours ago

“It was at this point that the situation went from ‘fuck’ to ‘very fuck’”

[–] [email protected] 32 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

This ought to be thrown out

[–] [email protected] 48 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It will be. They have immunity. It's entirely performative intimidation.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

And if the US weren't a corporate dictatorship masquerading as a "democracy", this type of terrorism would result in hard prison time for the fascist perpetrators.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 17 hours ago