this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
478 points (96.7% liked)

Science Memes

14742 readers
844 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don't get it. Is "tree" some kind of notation?

[–] [email protected] 98 points 1 month ago (3 children)

TREE is an extremely fast-growing function in set theory. TREE(1) equals 1, TREE(2) equals 3, and TREE(3) equals a number so large that its lower bound easily dwarfs Graham's Number.

[–] prettybunnys 28 points 1 month ago

its lower bound easily dwarfs Graham's Number.

Yo you don’t gotta throw shade on Grahams number like that, it’s doing its best

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Well, that escalated quickly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Yes, TREE(3) is larger than a googolplex or even graham’s number.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why do I always feel like I need a PhD to understand even the first paragraph of Wikipedia articles about math. Is that just me?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

yeah where's the Simple English Wikipedia article for Graham's number

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Graham’s number is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to Graham’s number.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Go get your PhD and write one yourself!

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What about our friend TREE(Graham's Number)

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Numberphile did a video on TREE(g~64~) so you gotta go bigger.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Needs more recursion
Also is your username from stormlight archive?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also is your username from stormlight archive?

:)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Justice for phenadora 😭

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

TREE(yomomma)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Haven't seen them in a while. Hope they're doing well

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (14 children)

That article is not comprehensible to most people

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3P6DWAwwViU

Here is a Numberphile video that describes how large a number we are talking.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Thanks, I get it now!

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Math meme ... it's a math meme!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Is math related to science?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I don't think so, science deals with reality and math are just floating around

/joke

[–] Tar_alcaran 2 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

man hes gone have to do a lot of walking again... Offtopic: The funny thing is TREE(3) is an absurdly long distance, independent of the physical unit. Even TREE(3) times the planck length is unimaginable long, as the ratio between a meter and the planck length is absolutely neglectable against such super large numbers.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

It's so large that the number of digits it has is too large to represent, and the number of digits in that number is too large to represent, and so on for a number of times that is also far too large to represent.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

So the only way it's worth taking about it is in memes right? Right?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Let's say you have to move to the infinite room. How can someone check out of the hotel?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago

There is no infinity room, but there is an infinity pool

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can check out any time you like

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The only issue is that if I have to travel to an infinite distance to the lobby, I'll never check out.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don't worry, you can never be put in a room with an infinite number, only an arbitrarily large one. That's the idea of the hotel; it has an infinite number of rooms, but every room has a finite number, since you can count forever without reaching infinity.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Whew, I was worried as the infinite passanger on that bus that I'd be put into an infinite room.

[–] Klear 7 points 1 month ago

Just move halfway to the lobby, then again halfway to the lobby and...

...shit.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

That's my secret, I'm always moving.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Just put a sign on the door telling everyone who comes there to go to the inverse wing. Or go set up in the inverse wing of the hotel yourself.

Everyone in the place is moving right along the infinite axis... But there's a whole empty wing of the hotel if you go left at the front desk.

[–] dechnically 2 points 1 month ago

legendary ball knowledge

load more comments
view more: next ›