this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
204 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23035 readers
3076 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago

There was also a very concerning hot mic moment

https://files.catbox.moe/cz3erx.mov

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

I read that wrong as in he gave them the man's severed middle finger. Honestly I think they may as well have, no one who goes to El Salvador is intended tonne kept alive.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

WASHINGTON — Sen. Chris Van Hollen announced that he will travel to El Salvador on Wednesday to push for the release of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a man who the Justice Department said it mistakenly deported. Hopefully we hear something soon. This is so fucked up. This is evil.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So SCOTUS will issue an arrest warrant right?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

They have already ruled that what he is doing is legal. Why would they issue a warrant?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago

Man, I don't even know where to get truthful news anymore. I try to keep up with both sides so I know what their narratives are, and stories like this one are fucking impossible to get to the truth of. Either way, it's fucking horrific that people are being sent to Death Camps without any kind of due process, but the amount of misinformation doesn't help.

Is he openly violating the Supreme Court, or did the Supreme Court decide "facilitate" means nothing can be done if El Salvador doesn't want to release him? Even reading the order directly, it's not clear. If Trump is NOT absolutely violating a direct Supreme Court order, then isn't continuing to focus on it a distraction from the bigger issue?

Is he an innocent father, or was he a twice convicted gang member who was awaiting a trial that he was likely to be found guilty of anyways? Or were those convictions not actually convictions and only claims from a dubious source?

Is he an El Salvador citizen? If so, why was he rounded up with a bunch of Venezuelans?

Again, nothing is right about this situation, but I'm also sick of the waters being so muddy that I don't even know what's true anymore.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The more they fight this the more I am convinced he is already dead.

If they openly come out and say it the conservative media will tell us he deserved it. They already dehumanize anyone who is different why not go all out at this point?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

Honestly I don't think he's dead, as soon as he gets back he'll start talking about the horrible conditions and that will be headline news for God knows how long. That would be terrible for the administration and Republicans in general. If he was dead they could blame the prison for not protecting him and shift the blame. But at least he couldn't tell the American people what he saw and experienced.

If he's coming back, it's in a box.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm wondering how many people that camp will hold relative to how many we've sent there.

[–] Corkyskog 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I wonder what this part of the camp is for?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Still unknown, especially considering if you zoom out even a tiny bit from that carefully cropped picture, you'll see that the soil in that area is pretty much the same color. That picture is also from 2023.

The lack of investigative reporting into this really shows how shit the entire journalism field has become.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m not sure if he’s still alive, but I think the administration wants to win the battle that they don’t have to him back, then the next one will be someone who doesn’t even have “alleged” ties to whatever, and finally it will be U.S. citizens that Trump just doesn’t like - poor, brown, Democrat - you know the list.

But if they lose step one they can’t even try step two.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Ok, enough of the Fuck Around stage. Can we move to the Find Out part now? He pissed off the Supreme Court, the one group everyone thought was in his pocket.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

Don't kid yourself, they're still in his pocket.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

This is the same Supreme Court that ruled less than a year ago that he is legally able to do whatever he wants in his official capacity as president. Why do you think they are pissed off?

It would be pretty immature to give POTUS absolute power and then get offended when he uses it.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

Ok, enough of the Fuck Around stage. Can we move to the Find Out part now?

We're there. Here's a list of things that will happen to Trump:

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What is the Supreme Court going to do? Even if Sotomayor whipped out a baton, marched down to the oval office herself, and took him into custody, what would happen?

Let alone him having permission FROM THE SUPREME COURT to do whatever the fuck he wants.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's the problem, the Supreme Court has relied on the Executive branch for enforcement. They have no enforcement mechanism if the whole Executive branch is compromised

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

I think there may be some mechanisms. They can deputize citizens to carry out their rulings. It would be bloody though.

I'd also like to see them freeze any finances the administration has access to. Or individuals in the administration.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

Trump: All we can do is ignore due process and rule of law. kthnxbye.