this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
227 points (94.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

39762 readers
2097 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not defending Dementia Donny and either way I'm not shelling out $80 for a game ever, just wondering if this is really a result of the tariffs. I understand the console price being high due to them but I don't see how it would affect the price of games that are essentially going to be 100% digital

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 9 points 1 day ago

$80 was before the tariffs....

[–] the_q@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

They're holding pre-orders due to tariffs so expect prices to increase further.

I know y'all love Nintendo, but they're no different than any other giant corporation; greed is the reason prices go up.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

The prices are still calculated pre-tariffs, thats why they stopped preorders because the price will go up most likely.

I think asking for high prices for both the console and the games is a big mistake.

[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honest question because I'm OOTL, but haven't games been this price for a long time now and weren't Switch games even more expensive than this?

I'm a bit confused.

[–] HiddenLychee@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

AAA games have been 70 bucks for a while, but I'm not sure of any base switch games that were 80 bucks. Could be wrong tho...

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As someone who's bought games for the last 30+ years, the fact that, relative to inflation, they got cheaper surprised me (for physical games, in any case). For those physical games, one might think of it as a correction. Yeah, the number of buyers is up, but so are production costs. Now, is some of that greed with the top taking those profits? Absolutely and I hate it. Still, I'm surprised it took this long

[–] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Yup. I remember the first game I bought with my own money was Street Fighter 2 Turbo for 60usd in 1993. I had to run and beg my dad for more money because I was a dumb kid and didn't bring enough to cover tax. Calculated for inflation that would be around 120usd today.

And yeah, $60 was steep for a game back then, but I got it at Suncoast which was always a ripoff. Everywhere else in the mall was sold out and I NEEDED it TODAY.

[–] meliante@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I have a story. About 30 years ago Sonic & Knuckles was launched for Mega Drive. "I" bought that for 17.000$00 (Portuguese escudos). That roughly translates to 85€ without accounting for inflation.

So although the price hike is unfortunate, I'm actually surprised the prices of the games remained stable for so long.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Similar, I think I paid £65 for Street Fighter II: Champion Edition on MegaDrive. That's US$84 - and that was in 1992.

I must have been mad. Although, I probably played that game more than any other, at least until some of the huge open world games of recent decades.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MacAttak8@lemmy.world 111 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Considering they are delaying pre orders due to the tariffs I do not think tariffs are the reason the price is so high. I think Nintendo is trying to set a new standard for game prices. If these games still sell at $80 then I wouldn’t be surprised to see GTA 6 release for $100. The whole gaming market will likely follow.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

luckily, this is the one industry you can boycott them AND still get the product anyway 🏴‍☠️

[–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or be a patient gamer and get it on a sale.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 days ago

The whole AAAAAAAA gaming market... I still see the Indy devs not caving to this bullshit. I only support indy devs now. The AAAAAAAAA pricks are useless, overpriced failures imo

[–] DeusUmbra@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Nintendo just greedy, always have been, always will be. Don't buy their trash, just emulate it.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They don't take in the same amounts of profits as other greedy companies. Only $1.5 billion last year. Still a lot, don't get me wrong.

I don't care for them because of the way they gatekeep games they don't even produce anymore, like old NES/SNES games. their anti emulation stance is pure garbage, either sell the game or fuck off when people emulate it, you don't get it both ways.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

Vote with your wallet, and don't let the FOMO pull you in.

Nintendo is just a small slice of the gaming industry. If you don't like what you see there are other platforms and game developers.

For 80 usd you can buy a handful of bigger titles during a Steam sale. Just saying.

[–] frank@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Okay, here's a slightly hot take.

I'd rather the price go up and the games remain ad free and high quality (not you, pokemon, you can get fucked) than become enshittified with micro transactions, ads, etc

I don't like it. But it's much more acceptable to me

[–] splendoruranium@infosec.pub 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Okay, here’s a slightly hot take.

I’d rather the price go up and the games remain ad free and high quality (not you, pokemon, you can get fucked) than become enshittified with micro transactions, ads, etc

I don’t like it. But it’s much more acceptable to me

That's absolutely a false dichotomy. In a world where games exist that are ad-free, high-quality and affordable, there's absolutely no reason to believe any notion of high prices or in-game ads being a requirement for development. It's just not true. Don't fall for it.

[–] frank@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 days ago

Okay, fair enough. Just appreciating the lack of shit and (for something like an Animal Crossing or a BoTW quality Zelda game) I'm super happy to pay that much for a game I'll sink hundreds of hours into, and I'd rather reward that price hike than any other form of monetization by them.

I'm real enraged by like 99% of things on the internet and in the world these days, but this pales in comparison to the rapid pace of enshittification I feel like I've had in virtually every other place in my life.

Still don't love it.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

But you don't need either. Plenty of great games are cheaper and have none of that bullshit. Rimworld, Factorio?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 60 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just gouging us. Even on the 3DS before they shut the shop down, digital download games were the same price as buying them on a cart.

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (6 children)

The new Switch 2 cartridges supposedly won't have the games on them... just the license to download and play them.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If that’s the case why would they bother giving game cards a higher speed interface?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hideakikarate 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Not all games will be like that. Some will have the game on them. Street Fighter, Elden Ring, and Bravely Default are examples of a few that will be key cards. Oddly, I heard that Cyperpunk will be entirely on the cartridge.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (4 children)

This is the problem with tariffs, it's an opportunity for greedy corporations to increase prices MORE than the tariffs or on products not covered by the tariffs and no one will be the wiser.

[–] phubarr@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Stage 2 greedflation

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

IIRC the price was announced first, and it's the same in other countries so I don't think that's the reason. Which means that lets asume they will use Japan's tariffs of 24% on them their base price goes from 80 to 99.2, plus in the USA prices are usually pre-tax so you also add tax on top of that, this varies from state to state, but a quick Google puts it at around 5%, so you will actually be paying $104.16 for them, and $117.18 for physical copies, or $126.63 if they're manufactured in China and you get that tariff instead. This is just one example of what these isolationist policies will cause, be prepared to have that happen to everything.

[–] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The increased price is not the result of tariffs, neither for the games nor console. That's pretty much confirmed by them costing the same amount (converted + sales tax) in Europe. The console is (was, before tariffs) fairly priced imo, it is comparable to the steam deck + dock.

Is 80$ Mario Kart price gouging? Eh. The edit maniac in the comments here is right that video games have become cheap, maybe even too cheap, and that a price increase at some point was inevitable. 60$ was set as the AAA price before the smartphone existed, and was not always profitable as we've seen with the recent lay-offs.

My own 2 cents: I'm glad some company broke that unspoken rule (we ignore skull and bones for obvious reasons), so big releases have more options in pricing, too long have we accepted 60$ games with 20$ DLC, I'm glad if this means devs can just charge 80$ for a full game. Oh, and it's good for indie games too. People may actually buy the shorter games with worse graphics they wanted so badly a few months ago.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

The other thing about this price point is that it's a headline grabber - and then once people find out more, they will spot that if you buy a Switch with MK preinstalled, the game costs half that.

So suddenly it feels like, "oh hey, that's a great deal, and I was obviously going to buy a Switch 2 anyway" - and Nintendo get the sales and the decreased cost of manufacturing the physical game.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Well I've had essentially every console Nintendo has ever produced, but at least for now I'm not excited about the switch 2 for this very reason, I'm fairly put off about it.

I'm either going to buy a steamdeck or wait for the cost to go down (Nintendo is usually firm with their pricing though) on the Switch 2 before I'll ever buy it or any games.

Especially while the US languishes under trump for the next nearly four years. I'm not going to have a lot of extra space for added expenses and price gouging.

[–] MintyAnt@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Buy a steam deck

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lydon_feen@lemm.ee 33 points 2 days ago (5 children)

80? More like 90 if it's the physical version.

No this isn't because of tariffs. If anything tariffs will make it even worse (which will be painful.for americana to watch). This is just good ol' Nintendo greed.

There's zero justification for a Mario Kart game costing 80/90 dollars/euros. It's simply not a game with the kind of investment behind it to justify such a price home. IMO only GTA6 has a somewhat reasonable argument to get away with that. Yes they will make a ton of money but they also spent quite a lot making it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Unpopular opinion:

They could probably charge $100 and people would still buy them, despite knowing the games aren’t worth that much. Consumers don’t really care; they just want their dopamine fixes. Nintendo could wrap a literal turd up and label it the next Zelda game, and people would bum rush stores with fistfuls of money to buy it; just because.

[–] parmesan@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I don't think it's as much of an unpopular opinion as it is just a thing that happens. If the Sims community has taught me anything, diehard fans of a franchise will keep shelling out hundreds of dollars for new content even if it's overpriced dogshit

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Kinda sorta. Remember the pandemic? Prices went up but never came back down. I suspect the tariffs will do this as well

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I’d love to blame him but that seems like Nintendo’s choice. Yeah, I’m not fucking spending $80 on a game, especially when I have a gaming PC

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Ocarina of Time cost $116.91 at launch, accounting for inflation.

Edit: the original Legend of Zelda cost $144.89 at launch, also after inflation.

[–] Gabadabs@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Yes, but only accounting for inflation really doesn't tell the whole story compared to modern games. Games are primarily sold digitally now, meanwhile when OOT released all copies were physical cartridges - and that meant significantly higher cost of manufacturing and shipping. Also, games simply didn't sell nearly as many copies back then as they do now. Being totally real, games don't need to be more than $60 to turn a very very good profit.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Games don’t cost 90$ today for other platforms tho.. even Nintendo that are a few years old still cost basically the same as at launch

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

I believe they will cost the same amount in europe and japan

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago

Let's put it this way, the market price for the Switch 2 is roughly the same converted price in the UK. Now, to my knowledge, the UK hasn't also introduced these tariffs quietly so I can't, in good conscience, blame ol' Delusional Donald for this one.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

It's always corporate greed.

They can afford to sell games for $60 and still turn a profit.

But there's an excuse to charge $70 because inflation.

And there's and excuse to charge $90 because tariffs.

load more comments