this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
394 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

66783 readers
5079 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 26 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

I liked generative AI more when it was just a funny novelty and not being advertised to everyone under the false pretenses of being smart and useful. Its architecture is incompatible with actual intelligence, and anyone who thinks otherwise is just fooling themselves. (It does make an alright autocomplete though).

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 hours ago

The peak of AI for me was generating images Muppet versions of the Breaking Bad cast; it's been downhill since.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 hours ago (13 children)

Meanwhile a huge chunk of the software industry is now heavily using this "dead end" technology 👀

I work in a pretty massive tech company (think, the type that frequently acquires other smaller ones and absorbs them)

Everyone I know here is using it. A lot.

However my company also has tonnes of dedicated sessions and paid time to instruct it's employees on how to use it well, and to get good value out of it, abd the pitfalls it can have

So yeah turns out if you teach your employees how to use a tool, they start using it.

I'd say LLMs have made me about 3x as efficient or so at my job.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

I think the human in the loop currently needs to know what the LLM produced or checked, but they'll get better.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 hours ago

Pump and dump. That’s how the rich get richer.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Imo our current version of ai are too generalized, we add so much information into the ai to make them good at everything it all mixes together into a single grey halucinating slop that the ai ends up being good at nothing.

We need to find ways to specialize ai and give said ai a more consistent and concrete personality to move forward.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Imo to make an ai that is truly good at everything we need to have multiple ai all designed to do something different all working together (like the human brain works) instead of making every single ai a personality-less sludge of jack of all trades master of none

[–] agamemnonymous 8 points 9 hours ago

Mixture of experts is the future of AI. Breakthroughs won't come from bigger models, it'll come from better coordinated conversations between models.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

They did that awhile ago, it was a big feature if gpt 3

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

We already did this like a year ago mate. That was like v3 of gpt

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah but its like....pretty half baked

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

No, it's just not something exposed to you to see

But under the hood it very much does shift gears depending on what you ask it to do

It's why gpt can do stuff now like analyze contents of images, basic OCR, but also generate images too.

Yet it can also do math, talk about biology, give relationship advice....

I believe open AI called the term "specialists" or something vaguely like that, at the time.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 hours ago

Worst case scenario, I don't think money spent on supercomputers is the worst way to spend money. That in itself has brought chip design and development forward. Not to mention ai is already invaluable with a lot of science research. Invaluable!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

The cope on this site is so bad sometimes. AI is already revolutionary.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

That may be true technologically. But if the economics don't add up it's a bubble.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jubilationtcornpone 5 points 9 hours ago

Take a car that's stuck in reverse, slap a 454 Chevy big block in it. You'll have a car that still drives the wrong way; but faster.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Say it isn't so...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago

Its not a dead end if you replace all big name search engines with this. Then slowly replace real results with your own. Then it accomplishes something.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›