this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
129 points (97.8% liked)

Privacy

34477 readers
832 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 12 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 14 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 20 hours ago

For some reason I'm feeling so Amish... Seems like they were so right with technology risks :-)

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is no 'lawful access' without a warrant or my permission. there aren't laws saying padlocks need to support a government master key, and encryption is just a digital lock.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

With a pad lock they do have a key though. Bolt cutters.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Bolt cutters are not a key, they are a method of bypassing the lock. they still need a warrant to do that, which is the point.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

they still need a warrant to do that

Lol...

In fascism, if you have the biggest gun, you do what you want. And Trump has the biggest "gun:

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm talking about legally, and as much as I don't like trump we are not in a fascist country (yet).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 15 hours ago

What do you think the line is? When will it cross over and become acceptable to call it "fascism"? Because we've embodied Eco's 14 features of Ur-Fascism for like 20 years. We now have a de facto dictator who is using that framework to do explicitly fascist things... Where is the line?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The laws don't exist though because they're so easily circumvented. If you AES256 encrypt something today, there's an extremely lonely chance they can't crack it. For years.

With a padlock they can just pull out the cutters and they're done.

I'm just referring to your point on why there are no laws against padlocks in this context.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

fair enough, padlock was the wrong type of lock for the analogy. how about a vault door? sure that may not be as common, but you don't have to support a government master key for those either.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Same thing goes for vaults, or all physical locks. It may take a little longer than a padlock but nothing comparable to the amount of time it would take to brute force good encryption. We’re talking maybe a couple of hours or days for a vault vs. millions of years.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

so? does the quality of my lock change whether or not I should be allowed to have it?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago

It's not my responsibility to make the FBI's job (or any cop's job) easier.

Also, folks should be using 3rd party open-source encryption, like VeraCrypt and a password manager that encrypts the database, like Keepass. Don't ever expect governments and corporations to respect your privacy.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

"So don't make us torture you for encryption keys got it?"

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 day ago

So get a warrant.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

Thanks for your interest, but I'll have to pass.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

any 'lawful' access that's baked-in will also be used and exploited 'unlawfully'.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And they don't give a shit 100%

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

It's the entire fucking point.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

fbi want direct access to encrypted data while simultaneously also all data to be encrypted in order to be protected from china?

do explain how this is all going to work because it's extremely confusing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The explanation is that they will just use this shit to target whomever they please regardless of reason. This is how fascism works.

It is mean to be confusing. Stop trying to rationalize it, you're wasting energy.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

I warn FBI. Fuck you.