this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
558 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

63134 readers
3262 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hector 12 points 14 hours ago

The problem with Web Standards is that they're so complete, broad and complex that it's very hard as an independent team to get started writing a browser.

You'd have so little daily active users compared to the titans products (Chromium, Gecko, WebKit) that even if you made something super good, it would still be hard to guarantee website compatibility without faking the user-agents.

There's also a lot of complexity involved in writing a sandbox for every instance of a website (tabs or iframe) and sharing information between multiple process. I don't know how they do it in Chrome, but in Firefox they have a whole specification language for that which compiles to C++.

You also have to recreate the DevTools and other tooling for developers to adopt your browser and for you to debug any issues with your DOM renderer...

I love how much the web has to offer nowadays with technologies like WebRTC, WebSocket, Blobs, GamePad API, modern CSS3 but it has also the effect of locking us down into a tiny ecosystem.

I really their should be legislation on what companies can do with their browser because they've become such an important piece of the internet so they should serve public good.

I don't know how to make it happen and I don't even know if it's a good idea when you consider the governance issues it would bring for open-source project.

I'm really passionate about this technology !

[–] merc 10 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, there are only 3 companies developing browsers right now: Google, Apple and Mozilla.

Apple's browsers are only available on Apple platforms. In fact, if you're on iOS you have no choice, you have to use Safari. Even browsers labelled as "Chrome" or "Firefox" are actually Safari under the hood on iOS. But, on any non Apple platform, you can't use Safari.

Google is an ad company, so they don't want to allow ad blockers on their browser. So, it's a matter of time before every kind of ad blocking is disabled for Chrome users.

Firefox is almost entirely funded by Google, so there's a limit as to what they can do without the funding getting cut off. They seem to be trying to find a way forward without Google, but the result, if anything is as bad as Google if not worse:

"investing in privacy-respecting advertising to grow new revenue in the near term; developing trustworthy, open source AI to ensure technical and product relevance in the mid term;"

https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/mozilla-leadership-growth-planning-updates/

All these other browser people like are basically reskinned versions of Chrome or Firefox. They have a handful of people working on them. To actually develop a modern browser you need a big team. A modern browser basically has to be an OS capable of running everything from a 3d game engine, to a word processor, to a full featured debugger.

It looks like it's only a matter of time before there will be 0 browsers capable of blocking ads, because the only two companies that make multi-platform browsers depend on ads for their revenue, and both of them will have enormous expenses because they're obsessed with stupid projects like AI.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 13 hours ago

Apple has a conflict of interest too: they need to keep safari gimped so that users have to install apps instead of using PWAs, so that Apple can keep getting 30% of the app sales.

As a result, Safari is terrible and very far behind in standards. It's the new internet explorer.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It looks like it’s only a matter of time before there will be 0 browsers capable of blocking ads[.]

I don't know if I'd take it that far. Firefox and the Chrome engine are open source projects. Anyone can modify the browser to enable ad-blocking in some form if a user is sufficiently determined. Now, will it be possible to write and distribute a popular an effective adblocker under these conditions? It appears to be getting harder.

[–] merc 3 points 14 hours ago

Firefox and the Chrome engine are open source projects. Anyone can modify the browser to enable ad-blocking in some form if a user is sufficiently determined.

Technically, sure. But, these are extremely complex software products, and it would be one hobbyist vs. an entire software division of a trillion dollar company who are determined to make sure you see ads.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I switched to Firefox the morning they disabled uBlock Origin.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 16 hours ago

I never left Firefox. It's a fantastic browser.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 day ago

Meanwhile ublock origin works fine in Fennec/Firefox Android.

[–] [email protected] 298 points 1 day ago (7 children)

If you're still using Chrome, do yourself a favour and install Firefox.

[–] [email protected] 221 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Let's be honest: Everything that might be "worse" or "annoying" in Firefox for someone is not relevant in comparison to "no working adblocker available". A browser without adblock is unusable

[–] JohnDClay 1 points 16 hours ago

I haven't actually found anything that doesn't work on Firefox on my personal computer. At work we also use Firefox, and some things don't work on it, but some things don't work on chrome or edge either, it's a hodge poge.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 day ago (4 children)

True, but if an adblocker no longer works on a specific browser, change your browser! I started using Netscape back in '94, and lost count on how many browsers I've tested and used in the past... Holy shit, 30+ years!!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago

Mosaic was awesome. Netscape 1 was pretty cool, but Netscape 2 and animated gifs... zowie! That was a day to remember.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago (3 children)

30+ years!

.....fuck off, '94 wasn't 30.... counts on fingers several times

.....Shit.....

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know... Jurassic Park is 33 years this year. It would be like watching a movie from the 60' when it was released.

We're old, friend.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago

I've never hated my life more than right now...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago (7 children)

In the past 10 years it's pretty much just been Firefox, Safari, Explorer/Edge, and Chrome. 99% of browsers are just skinned Chrome. Even Edge now. Opera's engine died in 2013.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago (3 children)

99% if browsers are just skinned Chrome.

Yup. Hence, the reason I originally suggested to use Firefox, only because it's not built on Chromium.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

What a silly comment. Chrome has plenty of good ad blockers still.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 13 hours ago

"Is this water warming up, or is it just me? Nah, there's a cool spot over here, this is fine."

-Chrome users

[–] [email protected] 5 points 13 hours ago

Yeah, because Manifest v3 is just being rolled out as described in the article.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago (40 children)

What issues do people even have with firefox? Its a browser, it seems fast enough. Isn't that all most people need from a browser

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Mainly that Google intentionally makes its sites (like YouTube or Google Docs) slower and less useable when they detect you're using Firefox, and/or ad blockers (which you need Firefox to use, so same difference).

It's mostly fixable with add-ons and userscripts (and eventually, one hopes, with an antitrust lawsuit), but it's still a hassle.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Unfortunately, with the FTC rolling back net neutrality protections, I don’t see an antitrust lawsuit happening, or succeeding, anytime soon

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (39 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Chrome? A browser that's easily replaceable with any other browser? Huh... Didn't see that one coming.

/S

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm saying this as a 2 year convert Firefox user: mostly easily replaceable. Sure, I can browse pretty much every page that I can on chrome. However, a few sites don't work the same way - sometimes because of the site's conscious decision, sometimes because of Firefox.

Take Facebook, for example. On desktop, I can't make voice calls anymore from the desktop site. For a while it was possible with non encrypted chats, but now pretty much all of them are encrypted, and FF is not compatible with that. I also can't watch h265 videos in my chats anymore. I'm still sticking with FF, but I just can't easily say that FF is just as good for everything (I'm still not going back to chrome).

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yeah I'm a 20-some year FF user and when it started you had to have IE as a backup because not everything was compatible. In the late 2000s through late 2010s everything worked everywhere, then with chromes dominance places have stopped testing or supporting certain things in FF and it feels like history is repeating itself. Unfortunately you need a chromium-based backup realistically for certain sites, but 99.5% of things work totally fine in FF.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 day ago (1 children)

LibreWolf if you want security, privacy and freedom

https://librewolf.net/

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

Fennec on Android

[–] [email protected] 128 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 18 hours ago

upvoted for the spinny gif ... weeeeeeeee C:

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago

Vivaldi on Linux and Windows is still good in my experience, and so far uBlock Origin for manifest v2 still works. I hope they keep v2 support forever, forking completely if they must.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

This looks really interesting, but I have so many questions. A few important ones that come to mind immediately:

  1. What is the user agent that's reported? I'm guessing Firefox, but if there are any indicators that would give it away it's not Vanilla Firefox or a popular fork, this could make you more unique.
  2. Are the mods publicly identifiable? Another thing that might make you very unique and prone to fingerprinting.

A core part of being private online is blending in with traffic, so using a niche browser like Zen (depending on the configuration) would make you stand out.

The product looks good, and the privacy policy is pretty good too. Still, it'd be good to understand all the aspects of how Zen prevents you from standing out in the crowd.

I don't know if you or someone else can speak to this. I would jump into their community, but it's on Discord, so that's absolutely not happening.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 13 hours ago

The Lemmy hivemind Firefox bias is a little bit insane lol

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago

It's a good thing I stayed loyal to Firefox. Mainly due to my dislike of change lol, but I was forced to use Chrome and it felt ominous with its owner being Google.

load more comments
view more: next ›