RustyShackleford

joined 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago

I’ve wondered this myself a few times, but didn’t think to request the feature. 🥴

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 hours ago

Details and extra information like this are why I come to these topics.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Damn those were the good old days… Setting up my PC as a run through to fool the Dreamcast into thinking my DSL was dialup internet. I played PSO and Shenmue so much my family hated it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

For $4, where can I find this shirt?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 23 hours ago

Beat me to it lol.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

The problem with every system is it will eventually be broken down by someone smarter and used to manipulate the user-base that grew to trust its safety to market something. Be it ideas or products, the only true safety net we have is a choice in the decision. The second a choice is forced, is the second groups split away. Each user at least deserves the safety of choice if we expect them to trust in any larger system. Decisions being made by a smaller group of individuals for the larger whole, doesn’t exactly have the best history if we look at the world around us. Don’t get me wrong… Trust would be great, but we have to trust that going from one extreme to another will inevitably create a another new problem.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

I hear you, but problem or not, the devs shouldn’t be making major decisions for the user base after the fact. Anonymous voting might be a problem at first, but so will people who are broadsided by the decision. Not to mention the users who will use an open voting system to bully users they disagree with. You have to foresee problems will come with any decision, and a percentage of users will flee for each bad, meaning the safest choice is user base safety over forced decisions. Ultimately sad truth is, leaving things as they are is a much easier call for devs.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Wouldn’t it be easier to leave it as an option for each user on Lemmy?

If users want anonymity, let them have it. If they want to share their vote, let them do that. Forcing one option on others without the voice of the usually silent majority isn’t going to fix anything, it’s just going to scare some people away or start posts requesting it private again; or optional.

Not to mention, using this method you will quickly see how many users really wanted this option based on how many leave privacy enabled or disabled, instead of listening to a current vocal minority.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 days ago

Nothings funnier and straighter than a ton of men carrying around another guys sperm in a cup in public. /s

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You don’t need antibacterial soap at all, if anything it hurts your immune system in the long run.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

There’s also a number of them indirectly trying to use the numbers to trash talk Lemmy. Personally, I would prefer the quality over quantity you can see here on Lemmy.

 
 
 
 
 

Most people are killing their selves with third jobs to share apartments.

 
 
 
 
view more: next ›