this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
194 points (99.5% liked)

politics

20365 readers
3109 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'll note that which government agencies are facing huge cuts appears to correlate with perceived ideology, rather than any evidence of fraud or waste:

So it may simply be that he likes the cuts, no matter how many people die or suffer as a result.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 96 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Motherfucker, you could impeach him right fucking now. You have no power only because you fucking cowards have put party so far above country that you're actively yielding all governmental power to a pair of fascists.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Well, they cant impeach Musk, because he holds no office.

They could impeach Trump, but they won't. They choose to be powerless, because they want a smaller Federal bureaucracy, no matter the legalities. They want Trump to break the law to do this, while they abdicate their responsibility to check his actions.

When it all goes South and the US is irrevocably harmed, the party can blame Trump and pretend it will all be better once he's gone. In the meantime, the damage is done. And if the blowback is so severe that we elect a Democratic President next time, then Republicans in Congress will all of a sudden rediscover the power the Constitution affords them to constrain the Presidency.

[–] skulblaka 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I want to bring back the days of beating a motherfucker half to death on the senate floor.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Bring the cane!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

They can arrest Elmo, they can have him executed if they wanted to. The king can do no wrong, remember?

It's just that they don't want

[–] earphone843 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There's not going to be a next time, buddy. The US is a fascist state, and you can't vote out fascism.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You may be right, but one key difference between the US and prior states that have fully descended into Fascism is that the election apparatus here is extremely distributed and ultimately controlled by individual states. So in order for the country to go full Fascist, they also have to convert enough Statehouses so the outcome of the election won't matter.

And while there are several states that are full MAGA, there are enough on the bubble who would give their election officials cover if they get in trouble with the King for trying to keep their elections fair.

The next Federal election in 2026 will be key. If Republicans are not punished at the polls for their leader being a tyrant, that's the point of no return. If some opposition takes root that turns into results, though, then there is some hope that we can pull out of this.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Keep in mind that the state's voter base being on the bubble is very different from the state's government being on the bubble. Because of "winner take all" voting systems, there are a bunch of states with a thoroughly "purple" constituency but which nevertheless have a Republican stranglehold on all the levers of power.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

They can’t impeach him, because he’s doing what they want him to do. If he were to turn around tomorrow and announce UBI, a return of DEI, and a hefty tax on the rich, you’d bet he’d be out on his ass before you could say Jack Robinson.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Congress has the power of the purse. They just have to put on their big boy pants.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago

Thats how it should be. Sadly, we don’t have a full congress. We have 45% of a congress and 55% lying, stealing, dirtbags who do not understand that they serve the people of the USA.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

But this President has decided that it matters more who wears the pants in his relationships. Purses are for pussies.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Republicans have spent my entire life defending the second amendment under the guise that it is the only way to stop a tyrannical government. Not sure why, but I feel like this is should be relevant to Americans these days.

[–] Mouselemming 4 points 2 days ago

Guess what? It's also a really good way to help install/enforce a tyrannical government.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago

well, when your whole party is bending over licking trumps butthole, that will happen

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Remember kids, the opposite of progress is Congress.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Maybe if they had a spine they could, I don't know, do literally anything to impeach Tramp and remove his handler.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

@silence7

What? Republicans have caught the Democrats' "Our hands are tied" syndrome?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Extremists hate heretics more than infidels.