this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
508 points (99.2% liked)

politics

20365 readers
3096 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Interestingly, unlike cases where publication like this was in the public interest, as with Reality Winner, Elon Musk has yet to be arrested.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 161 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is how you know the current administration is wholly corrupt: Even when Elon Musk does blatantly illegal things, the DoJ won't prosecute him. Trump doesn't care that this is illegal.

It is so stupid that the prosecution of federal crimes can be politically co-opted like this.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Prosecution for leaking of classified information is complicated.

Because... the inherent act of doing so confirms that something was classified information. Instead they are either talked to behind the scenes or they get black helicoptered.

There is also the argument that the POTUS is the be all end all of what is and is not classified and since musk is basically the POTUS. Optimally there is paperwork associated with this but it gets into one of those wonderful "gentleman's agreement" grey zones.

That is why you'll never see someone get charges filed against them for admitting that nixon was actually killed by aliens from Rygel 7 and replaced with an android. Instead they will just

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is a fantasy. People get charged for leaking classified information all the time. It's just a crime, not a spy thriller.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They will just what

THEY WILL JUST WHAT?

Blink twice if you're ok!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bro got abducted by government aliens

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Can you hear a helicopter ?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

the inherent act of doing so confirms that something was classified information.

Does it? You can investigate to verify if there was a "leak" - aka some communication happened, and if it did, whether it was classified or just a dick pic

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

We should allow any 1 of the 50 states prosecute the federal gov. Its the only way to balance stuff out if the President is the person making all the appointments

[–] [email protected] 102 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Remember people that are completely full of shit are most often... Completely full of shit. Demand evidence for every claim and don't accept false premises.

[–] KnowledgeableNip 14 points 1 week ago

Been in data for ten years and data cleaning/validating is usually one of the first steps on any real analysis if you know what you're doing.

So I'm not surprised that the Dunning-Krugers skipped it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

This didn't seem correct to me. Ask far as I know the ISO 8601 standard is just about presentation, and has no start date (although you cannot go before year 1 in most systems that I've seen).

I found this article:

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/2/14/2303889/-Nope-There-are-no-150-year-olds-on-Social-Security-It-s-COBOL

Which confirms the gist though.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is no locking him up. Trump would just pardon him. The only solution to this is of a more permanent kind administered by one of the alphabet agencies whose agents he is going to get killed.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

There is another solution. When they call in the military, and they will, those people swore an oath to the constitution and are required to refuse an illegal order.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Imagine if Kamala had gotten elected, chose her own personal gremlin, and then unleashed it to do this crap.

Conservatives would be livid!

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

They'd have likely embarked on a violent rebellion. I can't say that would be wrong.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

There probably are a lot of livid conservatives but we're not going to hear about it. They rig the elections and they rig the media coverage.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago

Hours after this story published, a White House spokesperson said in a statement that DOGE did not share classified information ― even as NRO’s classified information was still accessible on DOGE’s website.

“DOGE did not share classified information, any assertion to the contrary is a lie,” said the spokesperson. “Yesterday the accusation was DOGE was not transparent and today the accusation is DOGE is too transparent. Stop the fearmongering, DOGE’s mission remains to cut waste, fraud, and abuse and are doing so with the proper security clearances and following the law.”

Lmao peak professionalism guys.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I cannot do jury duty anymore.

Sorry.

I cannot be impartial in this justice system.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

That's probably a good way to get out of it..

I don't feel that our justice system is fair to everyone. People who are of non-white origin, non native or people who have a net worth of less than 1 million dollars do not get the treatment / benefits as people who do not fit in this group. Everyone in this court room is being unfairly treated by our justice system.. you, me, them... Everybody. And until those who have are treated the same as those who have not.... The have nots are not guilty.

Or what ever.. someone more eloquent than I could probably whip that into a class warfare rant.

[–] earphone843 4 points 1 week ago

All you have to do is hint that you support jury nullification.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Then it becomes copypasta and judges get tired of having to sit through the same rant over and over.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hate when people talk about getting out of jury duty. If you think the system is bad, jury duty is on of the few ways you can actually have a direct personal impact on it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

And "smart" people that make good money always get out of it. Leaving the jury pool in a sorry state. I've even heard it said that if you can't get out of jury duty, you're an idiot. Fuck Americans.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

If you look through the DOGE twitter page he’s screenshooting canceled contracts and it’ll have the name and email of the persons that approved such projects. Totally illegal

[–] meowmeowbeanz 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Musk's latest circus act—pumping Doge with one hand while juggling national security clearances with the other—perfectly encapsulates our modern dystopia. The man treats classified protocols like Twitter reply guys, reducing state secrets to meme stock collateral. But let's not pretend this is about one unhinged billionaire—this is the natural endpoint of a system that rewards algorithmic dopamine hits over actual governance.

The real joke? Regulators scrambling to apply 20th-century securities laws to 21st-century shitposting. We've built a financial infrastructure where "to the moon" has more market sway than quarterly earnings reports. Meanwhile, the plebs keep lining up for their daily breadcrumbs of crypto-hopium, blissfully unaware they're just NPCs in Musk's open-world RPG.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The crowd had gathered there to watch him fall, to watch their hopes destroyed

They watched them beat him, they watched them break him, they watched his last defense deployed

There was not a man among them who would let himself be heard

But from the crowd, from their collective fear, arose these broken words:

We are the dead

We are the dead

What have we done? (We are the dead)

What will we do? (We are the dead)

Where will we turn? (We are the dead)

Is there nothing we can do? (We are the dead)

How did it come to this? (We are the dead)

How did we go so wrong? (We are the dead)

We are the dead (We are the dead)

[–] meowmeowbeanz 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The poetry of despair is a fitting echo, but let’s not drown in the dirge just yet. The crowd you describe—beaten, broken, voiceless—isn’t just a passive victim; it’s an accomplice to its own undoing. They didn’t just watch; they cheered, they invested, they memed their way into this collapse. The "we" you invoke isn’t tragic—it’s complicit.

What have we done? We’ve traded agency for spectacle, governance for algorithms, and meaning for memes. The dead you mourn aren’t gone—they’re scrolling, refreshing, and buying the next lie. If there’s nothing we can do, it’s because we’ve chosen comfort over consequence.

So yes, “we are the dead,” but only because we’ve decided it’s easier than living with purpose.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't know if you recognized these as the lyrics to a Protomen song or not

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

So Snowden’s actions are tacitly cool now, right?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

“…said one Defense Intelligence Agency employee, who requested anonymity to avoid retaliation from senior leaders.”

Because of course they do, because conservatives just a bunch of vindictive school children who would sell their own mothers to slavery just because they said they couldn’t have ice cream for breakfast.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Sure hope the people get to this point some day soon once they stop laughing at the danger they put others in:

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Only the ones who saw it coming a decade ago are the ones who feel this way, like a slow moving nightmare come true while you scream away at all your friends and family only to be called a lunatic.

The ones who are unable to reflect / reason / see clearly / are stuck in propaganda are hard to move from their position simply because of the nature of how they got there in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Crimes for me but not for thee

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

So I have a stupid and ignorant question to ask:

I've seen arguments online stating that We The People cannot band together to sue Elon for accessing our personal information because he has been given "permission" by the president so to speak.

But

Can we sue him for being an illegal immigrant who is accessing our personal information?

Just hypothetical mind you.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is there a good podcast that’s kinda like the keeptrack sub that walks you through the events of the day before, what it means, what the implications are, if this has happened before somewhere else, what the outcome was, what our options going forward, and on a scale of 1 to fascist, how fucking close are we?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'm not sure if there's one in particular, but I've found the following to be good:

The Bulwark

Amicus

David Pakman

Ezra Klein

On the written word front:

The Atlantic

Heather Cox Richardson

Paul Krugman

Tim Snyder

Talking Feds

load more comments
view more: next ›