this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
736 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

61394 readers
3338 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gullible 182 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Shit, we should also ban insta, fb, and google places while we’re at it.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Don't tempt me with a good time.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

Actually, be very tempted please! Get 'm!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] tja 82 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

The reason we have a Chinese competitor that we cannot directly control is that Meta is buying up every promising US platform and shutting it down. Or just trying to copy it so that the competitor does not get enough users

[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

As if anti-trust law doesn't exist. It is crazy to me nowadays, most tech startup's goal from the very start is to sale to a big tech competitor. This certainly should have anti-trust implications.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 68 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Media headlines that use the word lobbying probably do it so that people don't take up arms. If they were to instead call it bribery, I think a lot more people would take issue with the whole process.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

they can't really do that because that would be defamation and they would be sued for it. Bribery is a crime and while it is effectively the same as lobbying from our perspective, one is legal and one is not and a media outlet can't just accuse someone of a crime without evidence unless they want to close up shop

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

When in practice Corruption is not investigated or prosecuted, nobody ever gets convicted of Corruption, the Media can't talk about Corruption as it would otherwise be defamation, hence the country has no Corruption.

I haven't lived in the US but I lived in the UK and this was exactly how Britain had "no Corruption".

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Except the only thing that will be prosecuted, or adjudicated, is the claim of libel entered by Meta, for suggesting their millions are anything other than legal contributions to something or other.

There is a solution, though, staring us all right in the face.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah.

Those of us paying attention have spotted long ago that the Ju$tice System is mainly a tool for violent enforcement of the power of the moneyed and well-connected elites on the majority of the population behind a charade of "rules are rules" and it being just an independent and a fair mechanism for equal application of the "rules defined by Society" to all (all of which is nowadays and in a painlfully obvious way, clearly a bundle of lies).

All it takes is comparing how the Ju$tice System reacts to merelly the peons breaching uneven contracts with big companies or to the occupation of the property of the very wealthy by the poor, compared to how it reacts to violent crime in poor neighbourhoods, to see how their Ju$tice is not in any way form or shape Fair or Just.

Maybe it's less so in some countries and more so in others, but nowhere is it actually fair and independent.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 62 points 2 weeks ago (13 children)

So what does Zuck do when Trump uses an exec order to stay the ban and pushes Republicans to reverse it?

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 weeks ago

Algorithmically quell his own cybernetic rage.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's already back up lmfao

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yep. But this doesn't answer their question. I'm rooting for a Tik Tok CEO vs Meta CEO battle Royale at the inauguration.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Tom just sitting on the sidelines, eating popcorn.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Trumps just gonna keep him hanging hoping he’s in the inner circle and bleeding him dry in the process.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Well we knew it had to be something. I mean most of Congress is too old to know what a tik tok is.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

They’re just too old for everything. They’re almost part of ancient history.

[–] Corkyskog 4 points 2 weeks ago

Tic Tac Toe!

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Headlines that basically say the same shit twice really are swell.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

If you want to produce the same shit twice, just use a colon.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

“lobbing”

is this a trusted outlet? at least we can be pretty sure a human wrote it ha ha ha

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well it is called readsludge.com

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I would also like to lob Congress.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago

“Issues related to voter suppression/interference, political ads and misinformation policies.”

It's nice to see meta have learned from their own mistakes and are now trying to protect ~~democracy~~ profits.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook%E2%80%93Cambridge_Analytica_data_scandal

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think this was less about lobbying and more about bogeyman of China.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't know why I do this to myself, but I read through Meta's disclosure

Every single lobbyist I looked at worked in DC before becoming a lobbyist. I knew it happened a lot, but it's really depressing to see

Also, why do these disclosures not require companies to specify how the money was spent? There are only ~20 different lobbyists mentioned, and Meta spent 7.6M in a single quarter

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

This is why we gotta ban TikTok!!!!! \s

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

$7.6 million, pocket change to these chumps. Up the ante!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Sad trombone.

load more comments
view more: next ›