this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
508 points (97.0% liked)

Greentext

4602 readers
2366 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 46 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

This is fiction.

It takes a lot more than 3 days to finalize terms of the divorce. It usually takes longer than that just to get both of your lawyers to look over and approve it.

Even if these two people are both lawyers, and decided to represent themselves, you’d need a notary present when you’re signing.

[–] Ulvain 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Fully agree it's a fiction, but couldn't she have had the papers prepared weeks ahead?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 14 hours ago

Even if this guy was stupid enough not to run the agreement by his own lawyer, even if there’s no contested assets, etc, he still ain’t signing that thing without a notary.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Isn't everything on anon just fiction?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Probably, but this is lazy fiction. How long does it take to search “how long does a divorce take?”

[–] [email protected] 1 points 40 minutes ago

Suspension of disbelief :)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago

Yes. You'd be a fool to believe it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 15 hours ago

Its like part of the plot of EEAAO. Where the husband gives the wife divorce papers in an attempt to get their marriage back on track...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I've never been married nor divorced, but I've heard friends talk about needing to "just bring him the paper to sign" I don't know if they're just stupid, or if there's an option to just nullify the marriage. Granted these people were very poor and to my knowledge had shared literally nothing financially.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago

They’re either meeting at a notary, or using a traveling notary service that’ll come to you.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Talking of course would have been better, but I have a sneaky suspicion that this was not the first time she brought it up. I think the first one, he didn't "care," and she thought making it seem more serious would prompt some action. I think she was hoping it would be a catalyst for talking/change and not just, "Well, it's been swell." Like, ma'am, he doesn't care. You told this man you fell out of love with him and he didn't seem to care. Then you present him with divorce papers and he signs them willingly, as well as saying that the bond is broken. You ran out crying because he's said very clearly that he doesn't care, doesn't want to "fight" for you, and did not react at all from the first time you brought it up until you gave him the papers. No "Oh my god, are you serious?" or "Can we talk?," hell, he didn't even bring up his own grievances. So now you take a nap on the couch, debating on uprooting your life for someone who at least seems vaguely interested in you, or staying with someone who is seemingly indifferent to you and your grivenances as he's like "lol, women are so weird" on the internet.

Again, not saying her actions were the most rational, but humans aren't always rational. Sometimes our emotions get the best of us and we just want to know that our presence matters, and that sometimes leads us to make mistakes. Sad for them both.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's fake tho. I mean it's 4chin the wife is an hallucination

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Even made up women can't escape the patriarchy! /s

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

> lack personal communication skills with wife

> casually post deeply personal and emotional stories on 4chan behind veils of text and anonymity

> oh shit am I neurodivergent and undiagnosed because I've never talked with a therapist

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

If you know what a greentext is you've got at least a touch of 'tism. It's a spectrum.

[–] Classy 99 points 1 day ago (7 children)

What a sad situation. I know a lot of people here think this is abuse and I can see their perspective, but I see this more as a relationship lacking communication. The wife didn't feel assured that her husband loved her anymore and the divorce papers were a last ditch effort to see if he still does. Sure, just talking openly would be better, but goddamn is it hard to find people who can do that.

I think the fact that she broke down and tore up the papers immediately after is a sign that she really didn't want to do it and was reacting to his genuine reply.

I think OOP needs couple's therapy.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

are you and the 93 people who upvoted you crazy??

lmfao in what fucking world is serving divorce papers and then tearing them up right after they’re signed not even just a little bit toxic, if not emotionally abusive?

maybe a fucking adam sandler movie but this is real life.

think before you do stupid shit? other people don’t owe you discretion bc you’re an idiot? “uwu but what about the wife’s feeeeelings????” brother man grow tf up this isn’t a high school fling it’s a marriage. if you wanted to pull shit like this, why did you change it from girlfriend/boyfriend to husband/wife? was that about feelings too?

oop shouldve ran when they had the chance and the papers were signed.

sorry as someone who grew up as a child caught between this stupid shit people like you piss me off so much. this is traumatic for all involved.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago

Your empathy is commendable but this is fake, homedog

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago

Object oriented posting

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 23 hours ago

I like this empathetic take.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 151 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 day ago

Completely broken relationship for sure

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 192 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I wouldn't want to stay married to anyone who would play these kinds of mind games.

[–] [email protected] 130 points 1 day ago (13 children)

To be fair, it doesn't have to be mind games, she could have been in a bad place and somehow figured out for herself that the best thing to do was to end the relationship, but realised that she was wrong. There are people who genuinely believe that they can make other peoples lives better by leaving them (a kind of "you would do better without me, I'm only pulling you down" mentality), that could do something like this not to manipulate the other person, but because they actually care about them, but are in a bad place themselves.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 96 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I mentioned it in another comment, but I'll repeat it here: This doesn't necessarily have to be emotional abuse. It can well be a result of the wife being in a bad place, having little self-worth, and convincing herself that anon would be better off without her. Perhaps anon's response caused her to re-think and reconsider, hence the subsequent breakdown.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

I would leave Lemmy if it weren't for sane, rational people like you who have empathy and don't just jump to the most damning conclusions without any insight into the situation.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (13 children)

It is emotional abuse. Just like it's still assault if a veteran with night terrors gets a adrenaline rush while waking up at night and beating the wife sleeping next to him in his confusion. It is not intended, but the damage is done. And it's done by the veteran; or the wife in the OP.

The emotional abuse may be coming from a deep emotional wound, but it's on her to fix it. She gets to keep her shards, or attempt to fix herself. By choosing to not work on herself she effectively chooses to burden the people around her. And they have no obligation to keep her around.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] fibojoly 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"The bond is broken, I said!" You can't unspeak the words.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

So... if anon took those papers and just taped them back together, would they still be legally binding if submitted?

Would this depend on the jurisdiction/country? I've never thought seriously about whether tearing up signed legal documents constitutes a refutation after they're signed. (a pile of torn-up papers doesn't carry any proof of which, either or both, parties agreed to the tearing-up). And thankfully never been in a situation where this question would arise. Also assuming 'tearing up' wasn't enough to prevent taping them back into a mostly-complete state.

https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/27773/does-ripping-up-the-only-signed-contract-form-invalidate-it

[–] ricecake 11 points 1 day ago

I believe filling out the divorce paperwork doesn't actually make it happen, it's just an application for divorce.
It has to be filed with the court and a hearing held to make sure it's all good and then the judge does the thing and you're divorced.
Mostly this is a rubber-stamping type situation, and the judge mostly makes sure that asset division is done fairly and any children are cared for.
If no one has objections, the money is simple and everyone agrees, and there's no children the whole thing is relatively simple.

So filling out or destroying the paperwork doesn't actually do anything.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›