this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
40 points (83.3% liked)

Reddit

17681 readers
256 users here now

News and Discussions about Reddit

Welcome to !reddit. This is a community for all news and discussions about Reddit.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


Rule 1- No brigading.

**You may not encourage brigading any communities or subreddits in any way. **

YSKs are about self-improvement on how to do things.



Rule 2- No illegal or NSFW or gore content.

**No illegal or NSFW or gore content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-Reddit posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



:::spoiler Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

don’t know if this is the best community to post in but interesting.

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Describing tankies as further left than other leftists speaks to a poor definition or understanding of the left-right spectrum. There’s no way that apologia for brutal authoritarian dictatorships should be considered a left-wing idea.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That’s not what the article does if you read it though, although I understand why the title would make you think that.

The article defines tankies as a subgroup of extreme leftists, others which include anarchists (like me) and non-pro Stalin/Xi communists

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

But I did read it lol

In Fig. 2, we present a layout of ideological subreddits, capturing the distinct positioning of tankies within the broader ideological spectrum. Their positioning, further to the left than subreddits like r/communism, r/socialism, and r/Anarchism, underscores their unique placement on the periphery of the far-left cluster, emphasising their extreme nature.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The phrasing in the quoted bit seems more like they're simply comparing they're left-leaning extremism to other, supposedly extreme leftist subreddits based on the kind of discussions and topics within the subs and not the ideologies themselves.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They specifically phrased it as further left of the left, which in this context "left" clearly just means "an actual socialist who doesn't want billionaires to exist."

On that note I'd absolutely disagree that tankies are further left than a real socialist. One of the many reasons a single axis is meaningless for in depth political discussion.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

oh wait I get what you’re saying now. Positioning as further left is probably not the best way to put it. It would be more accurate to say further from the mainstream opinion. I wonder if this is just the editorialisation of the piece I sent or language used in the actual paper they are summarising.

but the article is pretty clear that “tankies” aren’t the only “left wing extremists”

offering a comprehensive examination of a left-wing extremist community on Reddit known as ‘tankies’.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well I certainly agree that left-wing extremism is a thing, including among a variety of leftist ideologies.

My issue is that I don’t think tankies should be considered leftists at all. They are admittedly hard to place on the spectrum because their ideas grew out of leftism, meaning many of their ideals, language, and issues of focus are shared with the left. So to a casual observer they may appear to be leftists. But once these ideas have been completely twisted and transformed to defend and strengthen existing oppressive social structures, they share a lot more in practice with the political right than the left. A wolf is still a wolf even if it wears a sheep hide. And trading a king for a chairman doesn’t make you left-wing if the chairman has most of the same powers and no structures for ordinary people to wield collective power.

Left and right have always been about human freedom and autonomy opposed to the oppression of monarchy and similar institutions, but people have become confused because parties tend to shift to the right the more power they gain. Today people seem to view left and right more as competing sports teams than the broad ideological schools of thought they are. Tankies do not fit with leftist thought and should not be considered any form of leftist, regardless of how extreme they may be.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

I definitely agree with that. But I think to non-leftists it’ll be hard to get them to agree.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's a perfect understanding of the bullshit meaningless names.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

What do you mean?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

There’s no way that apologia for brutal authoritarian dictatorships should be considered a left-wing idea.

Robespierre has entered the chat.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Facing restrictions on Reddit, tankie subreddits, r/GenZedong and r/GenZhou, transitioned to Lemmygrad.ml, a Marxist/Leninist online platform. Tankies’ move not only made them dominant voices on Lemmygrad.ml but also seemed to amplify the overall toxic tone on the platform.

Yeah, this right here is why Lemmy will never take off, this place is toxic as hell thanks to the tankies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

It's problematic for Lemmy that the .ml instance gives the impression of a flagship instance since it's run by the devs. It gives the fediverse as a whole a bad look to outsiders. I speak from experience because it was one of the three recommended to me before I left Reddit.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

if only there was a way for admins of an instance to block federation with certain instances, we could call it "unconnecting"

[–] Technoguyfication 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Like it or not, the average person still sees Lemmy as a mostly homogenous platform. If they see “lemmy is full of tankies”, it’s not a good look. They don’t know how defederation works.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Gab and Truth.social are forks of Mastodon, but I don't see "Mastodon is full of alt-right garbage people" as an argument against using it anywhere. probably because they're unconnected from everyone else.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

they are forks, lemmygrad, hexbear are integrated with many major lemmy instances

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Yeah, its not just the Tankies that make Lemmy so toxic. Unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Great, now we have research on “tankies”. A word I didn’t even know until somewhat recently and have personally come to despise, as I have often seen it abused on Lemmy, along with “Russian shill”, “russobot”, “sinobot” and what have you, in attempts to discredit anyone who might say anything that is not constant political condemnation of China or Russia and respectively support for US/EU/NATO expansion. Its abuse in many ways resembles the abuse of the “antisemite” label to silence criticism of Israel, or indeed the overuse of the “fascist” label in (ultimately failed) attempts to silence the (new) right, and many other labels that unfortunately liberals among others are keen to throw around generously. It matters little what side of a debate you stand on, if you have to resort to so much name-calling to make your case. Other than that, research is fine. With the caveat that political research is, well, often political and thus not particularly immune to political bias.