Technoguyfication

joined 1 year ago
[–] Technoguyfication 7 points 3 weeks ago

Here’s a higher res version

[–] Technoguyfication 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Not sure what jurisdiction you are referring to (and I didn’t see the unblurred plate so idk where this is), but I have looked up the owners of several vehicles just from their plate number in the United States.

[–] Technoguyfication 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

“Redesigned body for maximum efficiency”

320 miles of range

original Model Y long range had 335 miles of range

I want whatever it is that they’re smoking

[–] Technoguyfication 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

For real, the only hard drives I’ve ever had fail on me were Seagates.

[–] Technoguyfication 1 points 1 month ago

Correct, but that doesn’t mean TikTok would be inaccessible if they didn’t have servers in the US. My point is that the federal government doesn’t have the ability to completely limit access to a foreign website. It would be very slow and they’d lose users, sure, but they could keep running as usual from outside the US and still remain accessible to people inside the US.

[–] Technoguyfication 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

They cannot take down a domain registered with a registry and registrar outside their jurisdiction. They could try and compel domestic DNS providers to block queries for that domain, but there are numerous providers who are unlikely to comply with that request on grounds of the 1st amendment.

Given that the OP is about TikTok (a foreign website) being blocked in the United States, your point has limited relevance here. Further, if the website was hosted stateside they could just physically seize the servers themselves.

[–] Technoguyfication 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I said “currently”. Sure, the US could pass legislation that would require ISPs to implement that ability. I said they do not currently have that ability, and you seem to be disagreeing because it is hypothetically possible for the US to build its own great firewall. I do not want to assume your intentions but it appears you may have misinterpreted my message.

What I said is still correct. The point of my comment was that the US should not pass legislation to build a great firewall.

[–] Technoguyfication 15 points 1 month ago (17 children)

And that’s all it should be. Currently, the US government does not have the facilities to block traffic to specific websites or IP addresses on a country-wide basis. We don’t have a “great firewall” the way China does, and we should keep it that way.

[–] Technoguyfication 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

You don’t hear the road names when your GPS tells you where to turn? I’m shocked by how many people are unfamiliar with major roads in their city. I’ve met people who couldn’t even tell me what crossroads they lived at. To me, part of learning to drive meant making a note of the road names near me so I was familiar with locations based on road names.

I’m not old either, I’m in my early 20s.

[–] Technoguyfication 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think the idea of the government banning entire websites (or really any information in general) is horrifying. The fact that so many people in America seem to be enthusiastic or at least indifferent to new forms of government censorship shows how far along we are to complete fascism. Information is meant to be free, regardless of whether you agree with it or not. The fact that’s we’re having these conversations is disgusting.

 

Note: I am not affiliated with this project in any way. I think it’s a very promising alternative to things like MinIO and deserves more attention.

view more: next ›