this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
521 points (100.0% liked)

fedia shitpost

0 readers
29 users here now

fedia shitpost

Rules

tbd

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheMightyCanuck 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

'Solve' incorrect

More like 'we need your opinion on all this evidence we have'

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Right?! I've always found it odd that the judicial system can't get anything accomplished without bringing in 12 random Joe Schmoes off the street.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

The judicial system can get plenty accomplished without juries. In fact, the number of disputes settled by jury trial has dropped drastically in the last fifty years, especially with the Supreme Court ruling on Brady v. the United States in 1970 that upheld plea bargaining.

The result has been a stronger judiciary that more readily upholds state authority. Instead of a prosecutor proving to a dozen other citizens that you are guilty, a prosecutor needs to persuade you alone that, whether you're guilty or not, you'll suffer more if you don't admit guilt than if you do. That's a fucked up premise, IMO.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I would love to do jury duty. It's one of your obligations as a US Citizen, treat it like that.

[–] explodicle 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Then they should get paid a living wage.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Fifteen dollars is way beyond minimum wage from what I've read online. Also they apparently give them sandwiches and coffee and let's them sit. It's not like any US corporation would go that far. Unless they'd grab their organs later on.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's $15 per day, not per hour.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That was a lot in 1922! And don't forget the sandwiches!

[–] explodicle 3 points 1 month ago

living wage

You don't get less pay for an easier day at any corporation either. We get paid for our time, regardless of how efficiently the employer chooses to spend that time.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Cool. I would love be to be able to pay rent and buy food, and jury duty is incompatible with that

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah. The right to trial by a jury of your peers is an amazing privilege that comes with the responsibility of willingness to serve on one. You don’t need to love your country to be proud to do it, just to love your fellow humans and to understand how much worse the alternatives are.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

None of my peers can afford to miss work for $15 per day.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Fwiw, some states require employers to compensate employees at their regular wage while serving on a jury. Probably not relevant to you in particular, since I think only 10 do (plus DC), but it's worth checking out if you're unsure. Especially since some of the states that do have such provisions may not be the ones you might expect. Alabama and (parts of) Florida come to mind.

Furthermore, in states where such compensation is not compelled by law, employers are free to develop their own policies, which may include full compensation for jury duty or other mandatory court summons (e.g. being a witness). I'm sure that that is not common, per se, but it bears investigation if you find yourself in that situation. Either by contacting your HR department, or reading the policies yourself, depending on the competency or sliminess of your HR contacts.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Pray you never get selected to serve on a grand jury. They can require you to serve for a full week every month, for up to 4 years (in PA at least). It's absolutely insane. You do get paid a little more though, I think it's $40 a day.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can always request an exemption for financial hardship. But that means that it's never really a jury of your actual peers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When I was called in for selection of the grand jury, so many people requested exemptions after hearing the insane requirements, the judge announced that no further exemptions would be granted.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

oh cool, so I guess I'll see you back here in a couple months for vagrancy. Super cool. Super normal.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Call this phone number OR WE WILL SEND YOU TO JAIL

oh well it's holiday hours here so call us after 7

Oh well its holiday hours here so no need to report

WHERE THE FUCK WERE YOU?

oh well we dropped the case.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I’m always amazed Americans seem to hate it. I’d love it if we had that here in the Netherlands.

When someone commits a crime, they’re not only hurting a specific victim, they’re also hurting the community as a whole. It makes people feel less safe. The victim and offender are represented in the courtroom, so the broader community should be too. A jury feels like a nice way to give them representation.

I’d absolutely sit on a jury if they had it here.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (4 children)

You have to miss work and your employer is not required to pay you while you're gone. In a country where most people live paycheck to paycheck, this fact makes jury duty not very fun.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

*In a country where your healthcare is tied to employment

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

While employers are not required to pay you, many will offer it as a benefit, but only up to 8 hours. Basically them saying "we know you're required by law to do this so we'll pay you, but you better try your damnedest to get dismissed in the first day".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

And some of the ones that do pay you, require you to turn down the fifteen dollars. That's some sadistic shit right there...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Fair enough if that’s the case. Over here, we get at least a month of paid vacation time and a bunch of days on top of that. So basically, it would just be slightly inconvenient to colleagues if someone had to take a day off. But that’s the same as any sick days, so not much of an issue.

Still though, if you can, I think you should. If nothing else, it’ll give you a front row seat to seeing your judicial system in action. And if you’re a bit more engaged, reading up on things like ‘jury nullification’ is smart if you’re ever called for jury duty.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

The best part is that the jury is the right of the criminal, not the community. Rather than having a judge decide your guilt you get to have ordinary people, guaranteed to be your peers, pulled off the street and vetted by the defense and prosecution to be as unbiased as possible to determine your guilt.

Many aspects of the American justice system that seem odd basically come from the goal to ensure fairness for the accused. We’re supposed to take jurisprudence very seriously. And in that vein it would be very nice if we could reduce sentence length to not be an outlier.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You don't have jurys in the Netherlands?

It seems it's not universal in Europe.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Nope, not a thing in the Netherlands. I know some countries here do have it, like Belgium for particularly serious or specific offenses.

In the Netherlands, you usually face a single judge for smaller crimes and a panel of three judges for more serious offenses. Basically, the judges determine guilt based on the evidence and pass sentences based on general guidelines for similar offenses. Jury trial is something we only know from US TV shows, but it's not something most people here would miss or be comfortable with. The idea is that judges are considered to be impartial enough to be trusted to do their work fairly and honestly. Of course, there are procedures to replace judges in cases where they might not be impartial.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

In my experience it's more like: decide how much money the rich person's insurance has to give the other rich person because of a small car accident.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I continue to be happy I am personally exempt from jury duty. I'd be fine if it was one of the courthouses in town but noooo they always have to be down in the big city or the fucking state capitol.

[–] ZombiFrancis 5 points 1 month ago

Hah, I went to college and work in public service.

I've never been called for jury duty.

Though I did work in a courthouse where juries assembled prior to trial. Criteria for jury selection in that local county court appeared to be: "Ancient and/or racist".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah im self employed, if I take off for jury duty I essentially lose my job. Court doest care, so fuck me I guess. I shred those when I get them and wait for the certified mail ones.