Here we go, reproductive rights.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
There it is, "I don't know the details. But let me tell you about my kids again"
No one’s answering the question.
A winning comment by Walz here.
That was a really good answer from Walz, actually.
Is he capable of answering a single question? This is just tedious.
Trump said blah, pls respond. Lol no, here’s what I imagine Kamala might do in some alternate reality.
Yup. Keep going Walz, attack Trump over and over. That's all you need to do.
But he said he would have a plan 8 years ago… I think he should have more than a concept. No?
The way this evening is going for Vance:
MODERATOR: [DIRECT QUESTION]
VANCE: "I'm going to talk about something completely different now."
The MAGA technique
Bingo cards here:
https://www.wired.com/story/bingo-how-to-watch-vp-walz-vance-debate/
If you get the square with "The Cathedral" and are wondering what THAT Is:
It's a term related to extremist blogger Curtis Yarvin, who's in the J.D. Vance/Peter Thiel orbit:
More on Yarvin here:
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/23373795/curtis-yarvin-neoreaction-redpill-moldbug
Conclusion: Tim Walz is just too nice a guy to say what needs to be said.
Walz pointing out that Trump does diplomacy by tweet.
so obsessed with impeaching donald trump. yeah well that happens when you use the us presidency for blackmail. Its not obsession when a person is actually being corrupt.
Walz has the receipts on improving the lives of the middle class.
Great point from Walz on trusting experts.
LOL at Walz just out there on his own and ready and Vance like, "WTF? He's already out here?!"
Ha, Walz didn’t just accuse trump of being an agent of chaos – he used YOUR words to point that out, idiot.
oh snap. walz pushing back on anti expert rhetoric from the right.
Trump got the house republicans to turn against their own bipartisan immigration bill so he can run on the issue. Hammer that hard.
Good lord. Can he answer ONE FUCKING QUESTION? Just one.
Vance is slick, but Walz is honest. I hope people can see the difference.
Walz hitting his stride now
Walz Pro Tip of the Day!
That is 3 AM or 03:00 Central european time or Paris mean time.
https://www.worldtimebuddy.com/est-to-cet-converter
We bought Beer and snacks, looking forward to Walz walzing all over Vance. 🍺🍺😀
Vance is... just not answering the question. His delivery is weirdly robotic.
Vance:
I want the entire Minnesota law dealing with abortion spoken verbatim, sir or my lies and misinterpreting said law will be true!
Federal land? We don’t have a land problem.
hey so if vance/trump is going to have things done here instead of overseas why did trump not get that done when he was president. this is the problem (well outside all the others) with his campaign. He had his time at bat and he did not do any of these things.
I think this is how the evening is going to go. Vance simply won't directly answer any questions.
This is marketing word salad, which is all you can expect from someone like Vance.