Sooo high urgency with zero consequence for missing targets?
Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
And I want to treat the UN like my weekly garbage, and have it hauled away and buried.
So ignore it until it kills us?
Haha yeah, I know right cries
I... does the UN think they're handling climate change well and promptly?
i mean the global un is pretty good on it; it's just that the larger world powers (especially the us every time they have a conservative who goes backward on it) tend to drag their feet on it
I mean I don't think it's the UN's fault they can't get shit done about climate change, but I still wouldn't use it as a model
Given the amount of electricity training and running all these LLMs requires, they might, like cryptocurrency, become drivers of climate change as they cause polluting generators to be built or unmothballed.
So.... a convention every 4 years?
Ineffective policies for the poor's that has a negligible effect while giant corporations make billions and exacerbate the problem?
Sounds same as always. Maybe they'll do it now with a sense of urgency?
I heard they're drafting a resolution to sheepishly ask the US 'why the big cars?'
"We should do something about this" - COPXX
confused. so nothing will happen, a lot of talk and EU makes a law thats only applied locally if memberstates agree?!?
I'd like to ignore it until it goes away too, but I don't think that's an effective strategy for either issue.
So, do nothing for 40 years while it gets progressively worse and allow countries to sign useless feel good things like the Paris Agreement?
Each one of these "initiatives" is just another 20 year delay in policy shift.
« creating an AI fund to back projects in these [poorer] nations, establishing AI standards and data-sharing systems, and creating resources such as training to help nations with AI governance. »
So basically burn money and energy on some hallucinating algorithm should be as important as investing in green energy and reducing CO2 levels. That makes sense. Like, yeah, totally onboard. What could go wrong?
those ai projects will be countering the climate change projects! government at its usual
"AI" is a scam that's contributing to planetary destruction. But it's nowhere near a problem on the same scale. This kind of political theater only fuels the "AI" BS.
IE regulatory capture and soothing bullshit?
Problem resolved itself.. ChatGPT is down.
AI: “Put glue in your pizza.” UN: “Ow no! It’s sentient.”
Ugh, my issue is AI is a pandas box, we already opened it. Now it’s an argument of regulate technology and banning people from doing certain things on their own devices like running foss LLMs, like if we do that we can also allow bans of end to end encryption
Yeah, but those pandas sure are cute.
my issue is AI is a pandas box, we already opened it.
The big difference is that there is no "AI" box, it's never been opened, and nothing has happened except wasting energy and foolish money.