this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
287 points (98.0% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4683 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The weirdo is being really explicit that the Republican party is going to convert the country into a Guided Democracy — a form of dictatorship where elections are held but how people vote doesn't impact who holds power — much like Russia is today.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 84 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's actually worse than the headline suggests. He was explicitly asked to clarify it in the context of "people are saying you want to subvert democracy". He then refused to and repeated the statment

Can't claim it's "just a joke" or taken out of context when the context is someone asking you if you plan to subvert democracy


From the article:

"It’s being interpreted, as you are not surprised to hear, by the left as, well, they’re never going to have another election,” she said. “So can you even just respond —”

Mr. Trump cut her off, claiming again that Christians “vote in very small percentages,” and digressing into how he would change voting practices.

He then repeated his statement from Friday once more, saying his message had been: “Don’t worry about the future. You have to vote on Nov. 5. After that, you don’t have to worry about voting anymore. I don’t care, because we’re going to fix it. The country will be fixed and we won’t even need your vote anymore, because frankly we will have such love, if you don’t want to vote anymore, that’s OK.”

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Annoyingly that "we'll have so much love" addition, combined with the weird claim that Christians don't vote much, actually does make me more willing to think he means that he'll have done such a good job and the GOP will be so beloved, that the "small" % of Christian voters won't be necessary for wins anymore, so they won't need to worry about voting, it will still be a shoe-in without them.

Still ludicrous claims across the board of course, regardless.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why give the benifit of the doubt when this is a repeated pattern across his statement

When asked to denounce claims of him being a dictator, he said he's "only be a dictator on day one"

He keeps making these statments. When someone shows you who they are, believe them

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why give the benefit of the doubt when this is a repeated pattern

This is exactly it. Trump is very good at saying just enough so that we know what he means and his followers know what he means while maintaining plausible deniability when confronted with his own statements.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

isn't this what americans call a dog whistle ? I learned it recently

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He’s going to keep saying it while people keep reporting it so urgently. Anything to get back into the news after the Dem’s stole the spotlight for a bit.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

“I said, vote for me, you’re not going to have to do it ever again. It’s true,” he said. “Because we have to get the vote out. Christians are not known as a big voting group. They don’t vote. And I’m explaining that to them. You never vote. This time, vote. I’ll straighten out the country, you won’t have to vote anymore. I won’t need your vote.”

This is just total nonsense. Christians don't vote? Yeah, right. I get that he's trying to come up with an explanation for basically saying he's going to cancel future elections if he wins, but saying his fan base has a low voter turnout is an absurd justification.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

He’s always been the one to say the quiet part out loud.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I guess this is also what is alienating some of the republicans. If he takes power, it's no longer a matter of being red or blue, or gerrymandering and cheating their way to success, it'd only be about being loyal to the fascist regime and hoping to be rewarded. It's a complete loss of control for everyone but Trump. Even the bootlickers will be in his grace, except he has none, and they know it.

It's simply not worth it for republicans. Trump is not a republican. He's a celebrity gone fascist. He took over their party because they couldn't unite on anything else but opposition.

The regime wouldn't last long though. Trump is old and unhealthy. It's very likely that another term would be the end of him. What happens to their plan then?

Truth is, he doesn't give a shit about the next election in 2028. He just wants the power to clear off the criminal records right now.

Even if someone wanted democracy to go away, it's an easy promise for Trump to make, but it's unlikely he'll see it through or that anyone else could do it successfully.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

All it takes is a Court and a Republican-majority Congress that go along, and it's very clear that they're willing to do so if he asks.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

The regime wouldn’t last long though. Trump is old and unhealthy. It’s very likely that another term would be the end of him. What happens to their plan then?

That's the point. He takes bribes and will die soon. That means the billionaire class funding him can control him or just wait for his inevitable heart attack.

See also: Peter Thiel's Dark Enlightenment and rejection of democracy, and how he took Vance under his wing.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Trump wants managed democracy! For Super Earth!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Stop posting paywalled articles on Lemmy.

Here's an archived version: https://archive.ph/KKddN

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's a gift link. No paywall for 30 days, aside from a quite small chunk of people who have done something unusual to break gift links.

[–] remus989 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I keep thinking I can't get more scared and yet here we are...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

I recommend taking three actions:

  • Check your voter registration — a key part of the Republican approach has been messing with those
  • Volunteer — getting out and talking to people makes a world of difference
  • Donate — it takes money to run ads and coordinate groups of volunteers
[–] mindbleach 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The weirdo is being really explicit that the Republican party is going to convert the country into a Guided Democracy where how people vote doesn’t impact who holds power.

Fuck's sake - stop gently phrasing how a fascist promised to be a dictator.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are different forms of dictatorship. I'm being clear about which one he's taking us to — most Americans don't have the language to describe it as such.

[–] mindbleach 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

All the more reason to be blunt.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I've edited the top-level post to make it blunter.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

New York Times Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

New York Times is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

Bias: Left-Center
Factual Reporting: High
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-times/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News

Wikipedia Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [Medium] (Click to view Full Report)

Wikipedia is rated with Medium Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

Bias: Least Biased
Factual Reporting: Mixed
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wikipedia/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

Footer

Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.