871
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 251 points 2 weeks ago

This is literally explicitly legalized fascism and its the law of the land right now. Even if Biden wins he needs to do something to stop this before he leaves office or the US will forever be exactly as fascist as the President decides he wants to be. It's here now.

[-] [email protected] 57 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

There’s not much he can do short of committing a crime himself. Democrats don’t have control of the House, so there no way to increase the size of SCOTUS. They were smart in ruling bribery is legal before granting immunity, or Biden would have been able to officially order the DOJ to investigate SCOTUS for corruption.

His hands are tied unless he wants to get blood on them.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago

Blood on his hands from BLM protesters, Palestinians, trans people, Ukrainians who could use the support more than Israel, most Americans who don't have enough to live with life threatening illnesses, Mexicans at the border, ignoring COVID...

Fuck the Court. It doesn't care about America. The penalty for teason is...?

If you or I did anything close to what Trump and the Courts did and do on a daily basis we'd be arrested in a high security prison. Jan 6th had next to no punishment for any of the leaders.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago

It's literally not a crime if the president does it.

There's lots he can do besides killing people if you are creative.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

Its time to get blood on them

load more comments (24 replies)
[-] [email protected] 34 points 2 weeks ago

Kill Trump, kill scouts. Problem solved.

[-] [email protected] 35 points 2 weeks ago

Hey, the Boy Scouts are getting better, no need to kill them!

[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago

Sorry dude. Order's in from Flavortown. Scouts gotta watch their backs

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago

in all honesty, that's what you Americans need to do. the days of peaceful protests and marching are behind you, you missed that boat a while ago. now a ship named "Revolution" has just pulled into dock and if you're not on that boat then there's no more boats coming.

Stop using the excuse of "but I need to work, I have to pay rent, I have to pay bills" because in 4 months time you might not have a job to pay those bills or rent. hell depending on if you're a woman, LGBTQ+, liberal, black, an immigrant, etc, etc, etc you might have none of the above.

The American people and the country as a whole are literally, currently, right now in real time dying by a thousand cuts. you're being slowly and methodically murdered with precision and too many of you don't realize you're dying. Time to demand heads on pikes and if they aren't handed to you, well you need to go out and get them.

One way or another people are going to die. I mean I'm not going to sugar coat this, people will die.

So the question is would you rather die laying on your back doing nothing or would you rather die saving whats left of your nation and fighting for your fellow American?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 141 points 2 weeks ago

Not “may have,” did. They did legalize any action taken by the person holding the office of the presidency. Trump tried to have his VP killed for fucks sake. That actually happened. It’s no longer the case that everyone in America is equal under the law. The president is now legally allowed to do anything that would get the rest of us thrown in jail. This society isn’t even pretending to be equal anymore. We’re finished.

I’m so fucking tired, and I feel like that was one of the main points of this. Dems are too exhausted and afraid of taking big actions to do anything about this, so like I said, we’re finished.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 2 weeks ago

Didn't they just legalize "any" official action?

[-] [email protected] 59 points 2 weeks ago

Exactly, and that’s how this court is so tricky. By not fully defining what an “official act” is, they’re claiming the power to decide later. Because that very issue will inevitably reach them after some batshit district court ruling. So they ultimately get to decide regardless, and this court regularly makes up ahistorical and completely absurd justifications that don’t pass the smell test, so we’re doomed.

[-] [email protected] 33 points 2 weeks ago

Easy.

Republican: Legal. Democrat: Illegal.

[-] nehal3m 26 points 2 weeks ago

Who says what is official?

[-] [email protected] 29 points 2 weeks ago

They do, and it will only be "official" when a Republican does it. Once they control the courts, it's game over. Nothing short of unstacking the court will avert a fascist dictatorship.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

It’s no longer the case that everyone in America is equal under the law.

Is there a "never has been" version of the "always has been" meme?

Them taking the mask off and being open about it is serious and dangerous don't get me wrong, but lets not pretend the law is, or ever was written nor administered equally - filthy rich and powerful white men in particular have always put themselves above it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] [email protected] 112 points 2 weeks ago

Earlier today I was writing about how we are in a full blown constitutional crisis now. Then I realized that we aren’t. The crisis is over and the Supreme Court chose to abandon the constitution. The crisis was happening before this decision was made, but very few people were aware or alarmed about it. We are now in a state where I doubt there’s any legal recourse. We’ve moved on to another stage and that terrifies me.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 2 weeks ago

Well, I hated reading that. Thanks a lot.

[-] [email protected] 90 points 2 weeks ago

weird that the constitution says nothing about "immunity" but the courts keep creating various forms of it. Its almost like we explicitly need an amendment that says courts are not allowed to declare things "immune" from the law.

[-] [email protected] 55 points 2 weeks ago

It's crazy because so much of the constitution is about ensuring no one is above the law, because they were trying to get away from a monarchy. Somehow this SC either can't read or understand the constitution though because here we are.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 2 weeks ago

Oh, they can read, they know exactly what they are doing. The Republic has had enemies within from the start, and now they control the most powerful branch of government.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 51 points 2 weeks ago

Remember: Fuck Mitch McConnell

[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago

Don't have sex with turtles, you'll get salmonella.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 33 points 2 weeks ago

Would be a shame Dark Brandon used his newfound powers to execute the supreme court for treason.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago

The powers now suddenly granted are decided entirely by the SC for what they seem "official/unofficial". Those jokes about how they'd try and do "immunity, but only for trump"?

That's what they've done.

[-] [email protected] 31 points 2 weeks ago

Cam I start calling the US authoritarian now?

[-] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe not quite yet, but if Trump does win then Project 2025 will certainly mean that they'll be authoritarian before you can say "well fuck"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Bit past that now. From the outside, the US is looking a bit like a failed state now.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago

No, from Europe I tell you, we see you as less democratic than you used to and with many problems that can escalate and screw you up (we are not celebrating here either), but you are still far from being a failed state, there are still police more or less functional, you can still call the fire department if your house catches fire, there is still a clear institutional hierarchy, more authoritarian but clear.

Yes, the speed at which you are flushing democracy down the toilet, when, I don't know maybe 20 years ago, you were the example to follow in many aspects, it is surprising for everyone.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 29 points 2 weeks ago

You know in the game Secret Hitler when the board has sufficiently advanced into fascism that it becomes strategic for the liberals to vote fascism and unlock a bullet? Honestly makes me think of that.

Not saying this is what needs to happen. I honestly don't know how americans can do to get out of their quagmire.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago

It goes by beyond murder. It includes terrorism by goons blessed by government pardons - MAGAs included if they step out of line. All dissent will be crushed. He warned us of his intention but some are way too stupid to understand.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago

How can Biden use this for good? Healthcare? Marijuana legalization? Reinstate abortion? Guns? Income inequality?

We're in unmarked territory and all I can think of are the abuses. Does somebody have a little hope they can spare?

[-] [email protected] 30 points 2 weeks ago

Problem is, it’s up to the courts to decide what is and isn’t “official us business”. As of now, everything Trump does will be “official”, and nothing Biden does would be “official”.

Doesn’t matter what is fair and even cause Republicans don’t play by that game.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

Could an Executive Order be given? It's hard to argue that's not official.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago

The Supreme Court isn't really interested in arguments, it seems. They're starting at conclusions and working backwards. In a sane world, you're probably right with the logic. But in a sane world we wouldn't have made it to this point to begin with.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

I once made up an idea for an action thriller, called "President Psycho", where a serial killer gets elected as the president, and immediately legalizes murder involving brutal torture for himself and his friends, if committed to the "right target". God my ideas are becoming reality before even realizing them, and the worst is that I had an idea for an edgy magical girl metroidvania that set in a dystopian world which has been completely overthrown by fascists, all while I just started to take more seriously a much more simpler and smaller game idea (Arkanoid clone that is basically a hacking minigame but bigger).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago

I highly recommend the following book: "On Tyranny: twenty lessons from the Twenty Century"

There's also reading of it by the author on YouTube.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

For how long this took — for the mere fact they took this case — and given their previous rulings, I'm more stunned the experts are stunned.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
871 points (99.0% liked)

politics

18138 readers
3744 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS