125
How long do we have to put up with this charade of her being an impartial judge? Hardly a day goes by that she doesn't entertain some absurd request to impede the case in whatever way possible.
"Your Honor, my client's shoes are untied. I'd like to call a brief recess."
You have six weeks. (gavel)
Defense can't argue the facts of the case, but they're sure trying hard to invalidate the case on the grounds that the Special Counsel was "unlawfully appointed" and being paid using an "unknown budget".
Well, the whole case is unprecedented you nitwit, thus the need for a Special Counsel and using general funds of the DoJ.
She should be held as an accessory.
Batteries not included?
Dildos don't have batteries.
This guy vibrates.
Not without batteries though.
No worries, the Federalist Society provides them free of charge
So if this goes through, that means that Hunter BIden gets his conviction vacated, right?
.
.
.
.
.
.
< crickets >
__ * __ *
Am I reading this right or is she seriously entertaining the notion of dismissing the case because Jack Smith spent too much money investigating? And what happens, does the defendant just get to walk away if they go over budget?
"Your honor, the sheriff drove to my home to arrest me for this crime. This cost the American taxpayer approximately $1.07 in gas and $.15 worth of wear and tear on a government vehicle. This was not appropriated in the investigation budget so I demand the case be thrown out!"
Judge: "Agreed! Case dismissed!"
Cannon's job is to frustrate Americans into vigilantism against the GOP so they can turn around and justify their own violent behavior. And the military is just sitting on its hands.
Mm hmm.. Hmmm hmmm... Wait
And the military is just sitting on its hands.
what? What should the military be doing?
this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
125 points (99.2% liked)
politics
18073 readers
4686 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS