this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
447 points (99.3% liked)

Privacy

30753 readers
375 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 95 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

So the implication is that keeping the masses in check is the primary goal and protecting the children was the incidental part?

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

We do this to find criminals, drugsdealers, paedophiles and terrorists. MEPS are never part of any of those groups.

Source: trust me bro >.>

Rules for thee and not for me.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Just remember "terrorism" is a generic term these days. Russia invaded Ukraine over "terrorism."

It wouldn't shock me if they started carefully monitoring political views to detect anything the state doesn't like.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago
[–] Socsa 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Don't fall victim to language nihilism. It's much better to say "hey buddy, that's not terrorism, you are a fucking liar and your deliberate misuse of language disrespects the real victims of terrorism." They want us to lose objective truth, which is why it's so important to fight back.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Protecting children has never been an intention or an outcome with these laws.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How to contact your MEP. We beat this bill last time, we can beat it again https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/home

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

it‘s still the old list of MEPs, right?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

As far as I can tell, yes

[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 months ago

Absolutely not. If anything, public officials would be the one group whose messaging I would understand being scanned so that the people can sort of keep them on check. But again, implementing such possibility that would still weaken security of everyone else as well so of course it should not actually be done.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 months ago

Privacy for me, not for the...

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The law must apply to all, including public servants. As they are beholden to the public, they are subject to review and FOIA requests are automatically granted for the content.

Remember the rule of authoritarians: if someone wants to stop you from being suspicious, they want to stop you from doing the same things they've done.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The law must apply to all, including public servants. As they are beholden to the public, they are subject to review and FOIA requests are automatically granted for the content.

Now I'm suddenly not so against this law. Journalists paradise. They'll have a field day!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It would just result in them having official and unofficial devices, where all the things they don't want linked to their person, political party or public knowledge is on a different device that isn't going to get caught in the FOIA requests.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 months ago (2 children)

How about making every message of government officials be public and saved in easily searchable database for the populace and make content of their screens be streamed 24/7? No? Why? Nothing to hide nothing to fear? Right?

You stupid fuck.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I Really like the ending, it ties it all together. Id like to imagine Clancy Brown saying it directly to the EU

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

You think they use official devices for all their stuff?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAAA

No.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago

How else will they continue to exchange illegal images with each other?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Hahahaha... No.

You (potentially) voted for this. You will suffer it as well!

Also all of my and everyones correspondence is confidental, now what? We in Germany have a law (Postgeheimnis) for that as well!

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 months ago

Rules for thee but not for me.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Found the real pedos lmao

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Is this a shock to anyone?