[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Yes, but that is not what I'm talking about. What I mean is that when Firefox is running and you go to change some setting in say, Settings page, then the new value for that preference is stored into prefs.js (at latest on Firefox shutdown, it might remain only in-memory for some time I'm not sure). Anyway, the new value persists only for that browser session, because on next startup whatever value was set by user.js will override it.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I don't think that could work. Not unless we are talking about different things, or unless you run their updater script everytime before starting Firefox.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

In addition, if you use user.js then you essentially cannot change those settings at runtime (via about:config or otherwise), because your user.js will override the settings on next startup. Maybe that's desired for some, but good to keep in mind nonetheless.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago

Well the feature development is certainly progressing - here is the tracking bug for it.

You can nowadays just test it in normal nightly without special build - it's extremely incomplete, but you can test it if you wish. It's tied to revorked sidebar which you need to enable in about:config.

[-] [email protected] 52 points 3 weeks ago

Absolutely not. If anything, public officials would be the one group whose messaging I would understand being scanned so that the people can sort of keep them on check. But again, implementing such possibility that would still weaken security of everyone else as well so of course it should not actually be done.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago

Yes. I want to have access to both history and bookmarks on all my devices and send specific tabs to other devices. Sync makes these super convenient.

21
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago

Right, but then you shouldn't be shocked to find out that a feature was removed because nobody seemed to be using it.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago

My first guess would be that this is caused by the website implementing its own navigation/history behavior using History API. That can easily mess things up, or at least not behave like you might want.

[-] [email protected] 34 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

If a website has a compatible PWA manifest the there will be an item labelled "install" in the three-dot menu of Firefox in place of usual "add to homescreen" item.

Edit: There's a few other requirements as well for the website to be considered installable as PWA, such as it must have a registered service worker so it can work offline. But regardless, if the website provides all the requirements then it can just be installed straight from the menu.

[-] [email protected] 53 points 6 months ago

Unfortunately by sending DNT you are merely suggesting to the server that you wish to not be tracked. There's no requirement for the server to actually care about you at all.

Now, if DNT were actually legally binding though - that would indeed be very cool.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago

None.

I don't think it's a good idea to take some huge collection of prefs and just apply them blindly.

Instead, make the changes that you actually want to do, so that you actually know what changes you are causing. If you want to put those into your user.js file then feel free, but in my opinion it's just better to change them in about:config directly - that is, unless you need to apply the exact same set of changes to multiple profiles.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago

Also, mobile Firefox has supported PWAs for a long time. I wouldn't say PWAs on desktop would be useless, but they make much more sense on mobile than on desktop.

7
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Hi! Just FYI folks, the plan going forward would be to build this community on Fedia instead: Right here https://fedia.io/m/FirefoxCSS

Thanks to federation, you can also participate in the community through lemmy if you want - though some features such as microblog or sidebar info won't be accessible via lemmy - for now at least. The link to access the community via lemmy world would be https://lemmy.world/c/[email protected]

See ya there!

4
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Perhaps not fitting exactly for this community because it's about a website, but hey c'mon its customizing :) Apply via userContent.css or Stylus or something.

Only tested with "darkly-red" style that you can select from your user settings.

1
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Let's have this post here also...

As a part of the front-end technical modernization the old xul box model is being replaced with modern flexbox all around the UI. Relevant bug 1820534

Previously, just about everything used display: -moz-box but in Firefox 113 the default display model was changed to modern display: flex instead.

What this means first-hand is that all legacy box model -related properties will not do anything anymore so things like -moz-box-ordinal-group, -moz-box-orient, -moz-box-direction, -moz-box-align, -moz-box-pack or -moz-box-flex won't have any effect.

The suggested way to deal with this is to just update your styles to use equivalent flexbox properties. Additionally, the old display: -moz-box is treated as invalid property value

Some examples of conversions:

  • display: -moz-box -> display: flex
  • -moz-box-ordinal-group: 0 -> order: -1
  • -moz-box-orient: vertical -> flex-direction: column
  • -moz-box-direction: reverse -> flex-direction: row-reverse
  • -moz-box-align: center -> align-content: center or align-items: center depending on what you are doing.
  • -moz-box-pack: start -> justify-content: flex-start or justify-items: flex-start
  • -moz-box-flex: 10 -> flex-grow: 10

Notes about order vs. -moz-box-ordinal-group: order supports negative values, whereas ordinal-group does not. Default value of order is 0 but default of ordinal-group is 1 so you might need to change what value to apply for it to have any effect.

Also, see this firefox-dev post for more information.

view more: next ›

MrOtherGuy

joined 1 year ago