were*
WheelcharArtist
joined 1 year ago
IPv6 addressed the necessity of NAT by adding an obscene amount of possible IPs
that is correct but doesn't change the fact that nat came afterwards as a workaround und now the ip stack goes back to it's roots without a nat workaround.
It didn’t start actually being seriously used until ~2006/7ish.
true but still nowadays it isn't even slow anymore just refusal
wenn dir benz billigstes schwarzes hochglanz plastik als hochwertig und edel / luxuriös verkaufen will läuft schon was schief, mit touchbuttons usw fang ich garnicht erst an...
Iv6 doesn't try to simplify routing and remove nat. that's just how things work. Nat is a workaround for ipv4.
Ipv6 is around since 1998. that's not slow to adopt, at that point it is just plain refusal from some because of the costs you mentionend
Danke Faeser, danke Aramäer!!
Dann machen das halt die Chinesen und der Michel wundert sich wieder
die nsdap wurde auch mal vom verfassungsschutz beobachtet.....
heute war warntag?
da brauchen wir wohl mehr überwachungsstaat! /s
Dreht die Faeser mal wieder am Rad?
view more: next ›
Valve? Mozilla?...