Rule : 196

[-] [email protected] 103 points 1 month ago

Involuntary vegan (health reasons) since 2018 here. I thought that I would lose al muscle as a vegan but I haven't noticed any difference there. What I did notice was vastly increased stamina and much better temperature regulation (not bothered by cold in Wyoming of heat in Florida). This is purely anecdotal, do with it as you wish.

[-] [email protected] 50 points 1 month ago

I just happen to eat a vegan diet because I travel a lot and refuse to pay people to do things to animals that I wouldn't feel morally comfortable doing myself. Maybe if I settle down somewhere, I would find a farm that allows me to personally verify the ethical treatment of the animals. I don't feel like I'm missing out on anything, though. I'm in great shape, not deficient in anything, and am routinely assumed to be 10 years younger than I am.

From my experience, the people who think meat is required to be healthy usually have the worst diets and are addicted to eating the most low quality processed garbage meat available. It's never people in good shape that go on and on about how crucial meat is.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago

I’m really looking forward to cultured meats for similar reasons. I take no issue with one animal (human) hunting another wild animal to eat its meat for sustenance - that’s just biology bro - but our farming practices have just become insanely abhorrent with regards to animal ethics. I can’t wait until some bioengineer makes my minced meat in a lab with no animal cruelty involved because while I hate torturing animals, I love me some meat.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

In the mean time, there's all kinds of great plant-based meats and such along with just making other good dishes without any plant-based meats. If we just continue to wait for cultured meat, harm will continue to be done

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

That’s totally fair, but I generally don’t like to ascribe to the idea that we as individuals need to take on responsibility for solving issues that are systemic in nature. I think anyone doing anything they can to make an impact is great and should absolutely be lauded, but we should never be placing or accepting responsibility for solving these issues onto individuals.

I have coeliac disease, which makes most plant-based meat alternatives off-the-menu because of the use of wheat or barley, so I don’t tend to feel so bad for consuming meat a few nights a week. My body struggles to maintain healthy vitamin levels at the best of times, so I have to compensate how I can and balance the ethics of the matter. I’m also not rich, which means I can’t afford a high-quality vegetarian or vegan diet right now. For someone like me, waiting for cultured meats is the best I can do right now unless a cure for autoimmune diseases is found.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

For the gluten part, most of the major plant-based meats are gluten free: beyond is, impossible is, etc. They are also not the only option of course either as dishes don't need to use any plant-based meats and can say be bean based or lentil based

For the individual part, the problem is that as long as people expect to consume meat, dairy, etc. in mass, factory farming is the invariable outcome. There really isn't much way away around requiring changes to consumption levels. For instance, something like grass-fed production couldn't even supply a third of beef production, and would even raise emissions as well

We model a nationwide transition [in the US] from grain- to grass-finishing systems using demographics of present-day beef cattle. In order to produce the same quantity of beef as the present-day system, we find that a nationwide shift to exclusively grass-fed beef would require increasing the national cattle herd from 77 to 100 million cattle, an increase of 30%. We also find that the current pastureland grass resource can support only 27% of the current beef supply (27 million cattle), an amount 30% smaller than prior estimates

[…]

If beef consumption is not reduced and is instead satisfied by greater imports of grass-fed beef, a switch to purely grass-fed systems would likely result in higher environmental costs, including higher overall methane emissions. Thus, only reductions in beef consumption can guarantee reductions in the environmental impact of US food systems.

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aad401

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Advice regarding product availability doesn’t always translate well on a universally accessible platform - for instance where I’m located in Australia I’d have to drive over 50km to my nearest Beyond Meat stockist and both Beyond and Impossible are around 3-4 times the cost of their true meat alternatives. Sadly my economic situation doesn’t allow me to pay $40-$50/kg for plant-based meat alternatives, and any ones that are near affordable are stuffed full of wheat or flavoured with barley. Another important note to remember is that the definition of ‘gluten-free’ varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, so not all products that are labelled gluten-free in one market can be said to be the same in other markets.

There are definitely ways to balance a vegetarian or vegan diet well enough to manage your nutrient intake, however this requires a lot of fresh foods that are also very expensive where I am. I’m also trying to follow my dietician’s advice who recommended that I eat red meat, white meat and fish once each per week as my body struggles with nutrient intake.

I get where you’re coming from - if everyone tomorrow halved their meat intake the entire industry would collapse as it is by definition a demand-driven industry, but I’m afraid all I can do for my part is reduce my meat intake to where I have. I also don’t think it’s fair for me to place responsibility on myself to fix an issue that requires regulatory and governmental intervention to affect real change.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

If you really go vegan don't forget to take B12 vitamin supplements. It's very VITAL and really the only supplement you need if your diet is diverse enough.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Thanks! I've eaten vegan for about 5 years, and B12 is the only supplement that I make sure I'm always taking. I've gotten some nutrient blood tests over the years to make sure things are fine. Right now, I'm also taking magnesium and omega3s. I was recently taking vitamin D as well, but I've been doing long-distance hiking lately and been outside for 16 hours a day, so I think my vitamin D is doing alright.

A nurse was actually just telling me about how crucial B12 is, and not in a vegan context, but actually because the "whippets" drug depletes it like crazy and it can cause people to just completely collapse.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I'm really interesting in how you manage to keep a vegan diet while travelling. Is it abroad? Do you eat food from locals? I would not feel comfortable refusing food offered by people because it's animal based yet I would stick to veganism. To be honest, I'm incapable of doing this. I think I would starve. I find it already difficult to find restaurants when travelling. I do not regret my choice to go vegan but sometimes I feel like I'm missing out when I'm in a different country and I want to discover the culture. Plus it makes day planning much harder.

load more comments (7 replies)

[-] wander1236 23 points 1 month ago

Sounds like the health reasons were good then

[-] [email protected] 87 points 1 month ago

I don't really have anything witty to say, but I do just to want to comment and say I really love this.

[-] [email protected] 68 points 1 month ago

Wait...

Our comments are supposed to be witty‽

I've got to make some calls.

[-] [email protected] 39 points 1 month ago

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

your face has calls to make

~witty~

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] [email protected] 47 points 1 month ago

Meat-eating gains are stolen valor apparently.

[-] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago

Gets complicated when you have empathy for plants too. 👀

[-] [email protected] 67 points 1 month ago

Raising non-human animals ends up taking more plants anyway because they eat a lot of feed who's energy is mostly lost. So if one were concerned with plants, eating plants directly results in fewer plants being killed

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If your goal is to minimize the overall harm to plants through your own consumption the most ethical thing to eat is people.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Billionaires 🤤

[-] Lucidlethargy 9 points 1 month ago

In glad we got to the bottom of this. People. People is the right answer, everyone.

That's a load off my mind! Let's start a company. Maybe we can name it after what we're saving. Something like... Soylent green?

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Fungus based diet it is

[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Fungus are most of the time the reproductive organs popping up through the ground from an enormous hidden underground super organism. So, in affect, if you enjoy eating mushrooms you are actually enjoying the fungus's cock and balls.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago

I was already sold on it before.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

But see, the fungus can communicate too.

I guess it's down to butthole sunning and air to sustain ourselves.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They are as alive as the plants. But maybe mushrooms, like fruit, are intended to be eaten, to spread the spores. 👀 🍄

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

As others have mentioned, eating fruits and fungi don’t kill the organism, and per my understanding it’s the same for vegetables where you pick something off the plant to eat

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

But if that were the argument, then you don't need to be vegan, but vegetarian. Milking a cow doesn't kill it.

I personally think that the animal exploitation argument is the strongest for veganism or vegetarianism, not any of the ones appealing to some naturalistic rule or that no organism should be exploited. Yes, animals provide humans a very efficient nutritional source that plants can't give us, but a) we stopped eating the majority parts of animals that are not meat, and b) that doesn't justify animals raised in cruelty, without any regard for their wellbeing, standing in their own feces all day and so on.

Our current scientific understanding of plants is that since they don't have a nervous system, they can't feel pain. And that while they react to stimuli (facing the sun for example) they don't exhibit any form of consciousness. Unfortunately there have been more and more claims to the contrary, but not backed up by studies.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

I have some bad news for you about the dairy industry in that they very much do kill cows. Cows producing milk requires producing constantly impregnating them. That means a lot of babies, only some of which are female and produce milk. They're seperated from their mothers and if male, killed because they're seen as waste (and would use the cow's milk because that's who the milk was meant for). Then female cows are also still usually killed after there milk production begins to decline because they're less profitable

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago

Wild fruit (e.g. fruit that hasn't been cultivated though centuries of botany) is trees tricking you to eat its seeds and poop them out in fertilizer. But those seeds tend to be big and wreak havoc with your digestive system.

True Facts gets into all this.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago

Gonna have to stop all the cows from eating grass and getting swole off it, the grass worked really hard to make that glucose from sunlight and your going to take those gains away from the grass?!?!!?? No intelligent life to be found in that picture.

[-] [email protected] 38 points 1 month ago

That's a hot take I'd expect to hear from a 12 year old.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago

Raising non-human animals ends up taking more plants anyway because they eat a lot of feed who's energy is mostly lost. So if one were concerned with plants, eating plants directly results in fewer plants being killed

[-] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago

No, the person is right. It's realy fucked up to eat and kill another sentient beeing to feed yourself, if your could just as easy not do so.

So you think grass and cows are comparable here? I'd be careful to judge others people's intelligence if I where you.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

It’s realy fucked up to eat and kill another sentient beeing to feed yourself

i don't think so. can you support that claim?

load more comments (4 replies)

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago

Grass don't have muscles. Checkmater hater. Better go train your brain muscles.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

🤡

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

What about the shit we feed that grass uh?!! We should all be eating shit instead of taking the hard work of the grass

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I made a mistake, sigh, I'm my previous post I made the mistake of thinking that grass was a hard working person who deserved the gains they had, and now, I see that I was wrong. I would like to apologize to all the minerals, ions and 400nm wave lengths that watch this channel. brings cute daisy flower into camera view I hope you can forgive me, I will strive to be a better person from now on.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Mother Nature is cruel and we are at the pinnacle. It’s kind of cool to see such sentiments that are so uncharacteristic for the cold, dark universe. I wonder if there is a single place out there where similar behaviours could develop. Would anyone else view them as we do or is it intrinsically human?

Are aliens cannibals?

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

I mean. Humans are mid on the asshole olympics.

Just take chimps for example. The males much rather eat their own child after the mother dies, than take care of it themselves. Females only can take care of one child at a time. So they are cool watching an orphan die from neglect or cannibalism.

Take dolphins. The males gang up on females to force her to mate. If she refuses, they drown her.

Zebra's and many other species go out of their way to kill foals just so that the mother goes into estrus sooner. Giving the male a chance to force copulation.

Storks build their nest above croc infesed land/water. This is to scare off predators. They also have the habit of evicting young that are either too weak (due to disease or bullying) or are oo aggressive (too much of a bully to other nest mates). The parents can't feed every chick, especially as they get bigger. So they get rid of some. Resulting in a mutualistic relationship between the croc and stork. It's a lot more common than you'd think.

Lions form coalitions to kill lion cubs, just to get lionesses to stop lactating and go into estrus sooner. Lionesses sometimes kill their own young if they have only 1 cub left. Better kill it, go into estrus and cook up a new batch sooner.

Beachmasters are known to crush newborn elephant seals to death. Simply because they were too close to their mother who just gave birth to it. Ever seen one of these jerks run? It's glorious.

Parasite birds form mobs to destroy nests that managed to evict their chicks.

And insects aren't much better either. Sadly I forget the name of the bug that pins down a female, forces copulation and then throws her out of the tree. I get the pinning part, but the throwing out of the tree bit just seems extra.

Then there is ofcourse rampant cannibalism in insects and spiders. Females produce more offspring if they eat the male. And some spider species, the female turns herself into a meal for her children in a feezing frenzy.

Humans aren't so bad.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

The difference is scale.

Looking at just one animal we eat: pigs. Widely known as a quite intelligent animal.

In 2019, 1.3 billion pigs were slaughtered. That’s “billion” with a “B”. So every day that year- 3.5 MILLION pigs are killed by humans. Every. Day.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

It's true that pigs are smarter than dogs. And they make wonderful pets. But we also farm pigs ourselves instead of hunting them to extinction. 3.5 million pigs per day, for 7+ billion humans. Not only that, sallow and bones are used for soaps, candles, biofuel, calcium supplementation and for some reason... making sugar white. That sounds as efficient as eating meat can be. Lots of animals just leave the rest of the carcass to rot. If it wasn't for condors/vultures to fill up the niche and clean up the mess, it would poison the water for everyone. As we see in area's where vultures are threatened.

Plenty of other animals are intelligient, and are killed by other intelligient animals. Take birds. They are pretty damn smart. Ever heard of the shrike bird who impales prey to mark its territory/woo females with food storage displays? The prey is alive upon impaling. Usually dead by the time a female dismembers the corpse. Isn't nature just romantic? Or what about humans being attacked by "dumber" predators. Humans may be intelligient, but it sure doesn't stop a hungry tiger/polar bear/hyena/etc. I don't think murder/hunting an "intelligient" is a good reason to label humans as worse than average. Though I do agree that pigs deserve better housing and space to express natural behaviours. Something mass farms don't allow.

A sea turtle (forgot the name) doesn't seem to eat the roots of the grass, but still pulls all of the plant out of the sand. Making it harder for the plant to grow back. Just like them, we screw ourselves over long-term.

Are we really the worst nature has to offer? I think we aren't per se. I think most animals given the oppertunity would destroy their enviroment, until they screw themselves over and a new balance in the ecosystem forms. Invasive species aren't a menace in the ecosystem they come from, only in spaces they aren't balanced in. We humans still need to adapt, and are lucky to be able to understand the impact we have long term.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] Barbarian 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Given how powerful and effective the strategy of cooperation and trust seem to be in humans, I find it extremely likely to be a common strategy.

I also don't think aliens lacking empathy would generally be capable of forming civilizations, so they'd be stuck at the hunter gatherer stage. It is almost a truism that amongst us humans, as empathy and trust in eachother breaks down, civilization stops functioning.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

If you lean towards moral truth being at least somewhat universal, then this wouldn't be intrinsically human at all.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"Eat its heart and gain its power!"

load more comments (1 replies)