I think you a word
Makes sense. I wasn't sure because Two-Pair also procs individual Pair jokers too even though it's a "Two"-Pair
Is it any good? I'd imagine in the early game as one of the first few jokers it's cool but I'm not sure what to do once I have five jokers. Like, how do I know what to ditch and what to keep?
It makes sense and I'm glad I didn't cave in to curiosity on my recent runs
in the stripped club straight up not jokering it. and with it haha
Never got around to finishing the first game. Probably should
Ich glaube egal wie man es dreht und wendet, am Ende des Tages leidet ein Tier, auch wenn man sich einredet, es leidet weniger, kürzer, was auch immer als das standard Masttier. Ich red dir da nicht rein, aber vielleicht auch ein Punkt, den man in Erwägung ziehen könnte
I think that's natural. The point of the tweet is probably to just allude to the fact that many people don't see other animals as living beings that can suffer and feel pain just like any other living being. By comparing them to pets, they're put closer in comparison to pets, thus maybe leading to more compassion towards them. Spitballing
The point I was trying to make about crop deaths is not that corn gets harvested either way and that makes it okay but rather that eating farm animals brings a lot more crop deaths considering the huge amount of feed that needs to be harvested for them compared to just eating the crops themselves. Additionally, if we converted ca. 80% of all farmland that is currently being used just for animal agriculture - feed as well as the animals themselves (look up the exact figures on the Vegan Society sources page) - into farmland for plants to consume directly and reforestation, we would bring back a lot of habitats.
I know it seems like I'm getting off track here, but the point I'm trying to make is that while the ethics of veganism are a personal thing and offer about as much discussion potential as any big philosophical question, I think, considering the state of the world, there has got to be a little utilitarianism involved because that is what veganism is essentially: the effort to cause the least harm to animals that is possible.
That doesn't mean that frogs are worth less than pigs it just means that if by not eating pigs I save the pig and the frogs whereas by not eating corn I only save the frogs, then eating the corn is the way that I cause the least harm possible. Therefore, I think it's important that veganism evolves with our options.
There's also an argument to be made that climate change kills countless animals and increases their risk of going extinct, following which veganism, by being less environmentally taxing, is also saving or attempting to save lives in that regard.
Ultimately, it comes down to how I can reduce the harm I'm causing to the animals in this world. If I had no choice but to hunt, then I would be just like a lion and that would just be nature, but I have choice, so I'm attempting to come as close to the lion as possible in a way that I only cause the minimum of harm I absolutely need to survive. The lion kills to survive but not any more than that - he doesn't breed animals and eat them. I eat plants to survive because that's the least harmful choice of eating/living I can conceive of at this moment.
To add to what the other two commenters mentioned, it's about intent too. Crop deaths are a thing, sure, but it's the next best to actually outright killing animals and harvesting their flesh. The animals that die in crop fields die regardless given that the corn harvested - and then some - to feed other animals which you end up consuming. Thus, it's fewer animals dying overall.
Sorry if this is a repost
Sorry if this is a repost
view more: next ›
Hannah Montana