this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
476 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19144 readers
1985 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Yondoza 133 points 6 months ago (4 children)

But we can't get a database for firearms?

[–] [email protected] 41 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The US values its weapons over decency.

[–] [email protected] 79 points 6 months ago

To steal a quote: America is the land of gun care and health control.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago

The US values its weapons over children's lives.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago (2 children)

that's against our privacy. but we can have a database for wombs. because i don't have a womb.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

I'm a liberal with a shitload of guns. I do not want a Trump administration knowing what I have.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 90 points 6 months ago (4 children)

The fuck is this Gillead neo-conservative insanity?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's the wet dream so many of these sick fucks have been looking forward to ever since the start of this secular nation.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (15 children)

Call this a hot take, but I don't think we are a secular nation. We are de facto a Christian nation. This isn't a good thing.

If you look at the laws we have, from no selling alcohol on Sunday (the Lord's day), to anti-lgbtq legislation, to what our social conservatives draw upon for their arguments, it comes back to Christian fundamentalist politics.

If you are Muslim or Jewish, you are much more at risk of being the target of hate crimes than a Christian.

The separation of church and state is something we are still trying to do. Even Jimmy Carter, a deeply Christian man, pointed to Christian fundamentalism being the greatest threat to America.

"Give unto Caesar what is Caesar's and give unto God what is God's" -Mark 12:17 why do I need to use the Bible to say why we shouldn't have to use the Bible

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Hard disagree. Separation of church and state is right there. RIGHT THERE. in the constitution (I don't mean literally of course, but you can FEEL it in there). And if you don't believe me just ask any of the 46 consecutively Christian presidents we've had and they'll tell you the same. The fact that 100% of them are Christian is clearly a coincidence (with #47 baking in the oven). I could easily flip a coin 46 times and have it land heads up every time.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Eh, if you define Christian as believing Jesus was the only son of god and the Messiah, then Thomas Jefferson was not one. He did believe in a god and Jesus' teachings enough to have his own gospel put together, but did not believe in things like the resurrection. He thought the gospels as-given were full of garbage written by corrupted people.

Usually people call that deism, when you believe in a god, but think Jesus was just a dude.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Many of the "founding fathers"/early US leaders were deists. They were super skeptical of organized religion in any form, and most dismissed out of hand the superstition and social control associated with religion. The US revolution happened at the height of the Enlightenment.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

i often wonder how many of them were just faking for the sake of the voters. I mean 100% a lot of them embellish it, anyone who actually thinks trump is that religious is either dumb or just in complete denial. If you could line all of them up with some truth serum and ask, i'd be really curious what you'd find. I wouldn't be surprised if we had an atheist president at some point.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 84 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

Weren't Republicans crying about HIPAA (fixed spelling, thanks!) and shit earlier when asked if they got vaccinations? You guys actually care about sensitive patient health data or what's up?

[–] [email protected] 38 points 6 months ago

They want both. Only when it suits them. Because they're cunts.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In conservland, we employ double-think. HIPPA is good. HIPPA is bad. See? It's easy!

Watch, I'll do it again just so you have a good understanding of the technique. The Jews are ruining everything. Isreal can do no wrong. Bam!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

I'll vote no for the bill but also take credit for it with my constituents if it passes.

[–] Untitled4774 16 points 6 months ago

They learn their new script from the writers, and don’t bother with anything from the old one anymore.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Actually this is a great time to talk about HIPAA, but what isn’t a great time to talk about the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act?

The important thing for Americans to know is this law says they can’t share your information without your express consent, and they have to give you your records in a timely manner when you ask for them.

So if you go to your doctor’s office and ask for all your records, including test results and scans, they have to provide them.

If they share your data without your consent (read those documents carefully who gets it), they have to start dancing to avoid jail time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 81 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What I want to know is what is she doing out of the kitchen and speaking in public.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago

Real life lol'd at this. Thanks!

[–] [email protected] 67 points 6 months ago (2 children)

That’s not freedom, stupid.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

She's really crazy, like mouth frothing crazy. Watch her eyes when she speaks. It's blank in there.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 52 points 6 months ago (2 children)

What a cool idea! Now let's track guns.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 months ago

Yeah. Hard no. I don't want Trump and his Brown Shirts knowing what I have. And for the non-gun owning libs, you don't want them knowing what you don't have.

(I honestly get the dig OP. Good one.)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

License, Registration and Insurance. Just like a car.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 6 months ago

Remember these are the people who say they need guns to stop the government from overreaching

[–] [email protected] 49 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I guess the handmaid's tale looked like a fun time for them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xmunk 42 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I absolutely fucking hate pregnancy crisis centers. These fucks and the assholes that fund them are fucking sociopathic. When a woman is pregnant she has an extremely important and difficult decision to make that will effect her life in a fundamental way for at least two decades but probably permanently... trying to manipulate someone making such an important decision because of your bullshit holy book (that doesn't even care about this) is morally fucking reprehensible. I've spoken with people who have been unable to talk about being forced into conversations with these asshats without breaking down in tears - these fuckers inflict deep trauma.

In a few decades these fucks will be viewed in the same general light as eugenicists and we can't get there fucking soon enough.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Fun fact, the moral permissibility of abortion has far and away the most consensus among philosophers. Literally philosophers are more confident that abortion should be permissible than that the external world exists.

As such, you can use opinions on abortion as a litmus test for sociopathic tendency since it’s such an easy moral question. In doing so, however, you’d be confronting the fact that 30% of Americans are moral black holes from whom no rational opinion can be extracted. In that context, slavery, misogyny, religion, and all the evils of humanity suddenly make sense.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

I absolutely fucking hate pregnancy crisis centers.

It's wild that it's Planned Parenthoods that get burned down, not the ones that deserve to be.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Is she the one who was doing that weird hyperventilating rebuttal to the state of the union address?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes. It took a while for the hysteria to end

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (8 children)

She should have visited her doctor so he could administer a hysterical paroxysm.

(For those who don't know)

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Wtf is wrong with these people?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

Maybe they have a worm in their brain, mercury in their system, or possibly lead.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

Just waiting to find out the bread has a new fungus in it

[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 months ago (3 children)

which would enable child support payments to begin during pregnancy

Ahaha, good luck getting support from your own party for that you dumb psycho.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 months ago

This..... [LOOKS DIRECTLY INTO CAMERA AND HOLDS FOR LONG PAUSE] is in-acceptable Mr. [BREATHFULLY] Presterdant [EYES WIDEN]!

[SMILES MENACINGLY, ALSO LOOKING LIKE SHE'S ABOUT TO CRY AND LAUGH AT THE SAME TIME]

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago

When it hits the other chamber, the left should tag on a requirement to have a national database of firearms, regardless of how they were obtained...if you own any firearm it must be registered. Make them shoot down their own bill.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago

Her eyes are as cracked and broken as an Alabama highway.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago

Under his eye.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago

Rs: "Individual freedoms! No government overreach!"

Also Rs: "Let's track these motherfuckers so they can be punished."

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

we had this already.

It's called birth certificates.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Was she speaking with that weird voice again?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›