this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024

131 points (94.0% liked)

News

23259 readers

3364 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

131

Mystery of ancient Roman dodecahedron baffling experts as it goes on display in UK (www.independent.co.uk)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

60 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A mysterious Roman object unearthed in an amateur dig has baffled experts as it goes on display in Britain for the first time.

The 12-sided object was discovered in Norton Disney, near Lincoln, in 2023, and will go on display at Lincoln Museum as part of the city’s Festival of History.

Richard Parker, secretary of the Norton Disney History and Archaeology Group, said it was a “privilege to have handled” the dodecahedron, but was still at a loss over what it was.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 48 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Oh is that why the fraudulent archaeology group I'm on started talking about this weird meme that seems to think that the Romans understood the concept of knitting and that these would be practical to manufacture for that task.

We've been having a good laugh about it, although it's the typical "what do you scientists know about anything" story that way too many people believe.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ugh I hate this kind of folk knowledge circlejerking

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago (3 children)

If it was done with prior knowledge of Roman textile making (i.e. the Romans actually did know how to knit), it would be an okay archaeological experiment, and experimental archaeology is a valid form of archaeology.

But this was not that. This was some lady who knew how to knit, saw one and said, "that could be used to knit gloves."

And the knitters who are part of the group have chimed in and let us know that it is far less practical than a knitting frame anyway.

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (2 children)

As someone with a BA in Archaeology, the idea that the Romans didn't understand the concept of knitting, is the dumbest thing I'll read today.

FFS, they weren't cave men...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Hmm. Yeah, it seems like it'd come before weaving.

googles

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_knitting

Knitting is a technique of producing fabric from a strand of yarn or wool. Unlike weaving, knitting does not require a loom or other large equipment, making it a valuable technique for nomadic and non-agrarian peoples.

It does say that the oldest known stuff was from 11th century Egypt, but I assume that that's because it's a cloth artifact, not metal, ceramic, or stone, so less survives.

The oldest knitted artifacts are socks from Egypt, dating from the 11th century.[2] They are a very fine gauge, done with complex colourwork and some have a short row heel, which necessitates the purl stitch. These complexities suggest that knitting is even older than the archeological record can prove.[3]

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

So this leads me to another “might be” kind of answer.

A weight to heave lines

I know that monkey fist and similar other knots to help casting a line to a dock or whatever als frequently have weights in them, the nubs and holes could help keep it from getting lost.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's a good theory, but they are found all over the place and not necessarily close to water.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Just spitballing on my part. I'm not sure what the context of the find is. I'd assume if it for knitting it'd be found near other tools for yarn craft. (distaffs, drop spindles, or whatever they used. and the, uh, yarns.)

I'd assume if it was for tent poles, it'd be found stored near tents, Similarly, if it was for casting lines... it'd be near ropes- though rope would have needed to be tossed for a variety of tasks beyond purely naval interests.

another potential is as some sort of lampshade for a candle/oil lamp. Though that'd probably be pretty self-evident, with soot and all.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

A candle holder has been one of the possibilities suggested because a couple of them were found with wax inside, but some of them don't have any holes at all. They aren't all uniform in size, some have holes, some don't. Some have knobs, some don't. The only thing they all seem to have in common is that they're dodecahedrons.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

well, that complicates things.

Are we sure they're just not messing with us?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)

That's my other guess. It was an ancient plot to confound future archaeologists.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

4th century welding test

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Thanks. I was about to embarrass myself 😅

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Just so anyone else doesn't- the Romans didn't know how to knit (it originated around the 11th or 12th century in the Middle East): https://motherknitter.com/history-of-knitting/

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That link mentions that finger knitting was practically prehistoric. Are we confident that there was not some rudimentary form of knitting being practiced?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

There are a great many Roman fabric samples from dry areas like Egypt, along with stone carvings of people making Roman textiles and writings about Roman textile-making and none of it suggests they understood the concept of knitting.

More to the point, these objects would be less practical than a knitting frame anyway.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

And it doesn't answer all questions about the object. Why is the object polyhedral if you only use one side to do the knitting. If it's a mundane item, why did they make it stupidly complex when a simpler shape would do. It also ignores why the wholes are different sizes when the size of the holes doesn't affect the knitting.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (3 children)

First thing that pops into my head is that it was used to lash poles together for tents, awnings, military banners, etc. I am no doubt wrong. But for some reason I think they would work nicely for that purpose, and make the whole kit portable and easy to set up and tear down.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That might actually have been a good guess.

I’d go with some sort of game- like jumping jacks, maybe. Or some sort of weird bocce ball.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

My immediate thought was that it was just some kinda ancient fad, like fidget spinners.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why make such a complicated ass shape when a rope or thong of leather would serve the same end?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Also, they're commonly found stored with people's valuables - coin stashes, jewelry, etc. They were clearly valuable. Many of them don't appear to have any wear on them either, so if they had a utilitarian use it likely didn't involve lashing stuff together.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

My guess is just a good luck charm type of thing. The Romans had a lot of those.

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

“The imagination races when thinking about what the Romans may have used it for. Magic, rituals or religion - we perhaps may never know.”

Yes, magic, ritual, or religion—the only conceivable purposes for anything archeologists can’t immediately identify.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Just like how the figurines of busty ladies are used for "fertility rituals." I think they were just prehistoric porn.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

And by immediately you mean hundreds of people working full time for decades trying to figure it out.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It didn’t take them decades to come up with the idea that they were for magical use, it took them decades to fail to arrive at a better consensus.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It took them decades to thoroughly and methodically rule out other explanations to make sure their initial estimation is accurate.

Archeologists are highly educated professionals that spends a lot of time and effort into research. I don't know why you want to portray them as bumbling idiots that make shit up when they dont know.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He's saying that archaeologists have a tendency to grandiously assign religious or ceremonial purposes to uncovered objects when they should start with mundane purposes first. This object looks like a dice. Therefore, the first potential purpose should be a dice, not a mystical device to contact the Goa'uld.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

I’m not portraying archaeologists as making shit up—I’m saying people in general jump to “magic rituals” when archaeologists can’t provide a definitive answer. The person quoted was explicitly speculating, not providing a professional opinion.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

My completely uneducated guess would be some sort of test piece for new smiths. Or a Thneed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

This is my guess. Kinda like making a cube on a lathe is a test for machinists, and making a captive cube within a hollow cube is a more advanced version.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Obviously you're supposed to put it in your ass

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Ok I got a theory and I think it's a good one. I would say that's a measuring tool, like an ancient tape measure, or at least I think I could use it for that. If you chose a zero knob, roll it a certain way, and know how to read the knob it finishes at, you can measure something pretty fast, the holes tells you which knob you are at and measure the fractional part to a 1/12 of the knob distance precision. It certainly must have a bit of a learning curve though.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

I actually wonder if this is a coin sorter to help count money of various sizes

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

DO NOT SOLVE THE PUZZLE

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] SuddenDownpour 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why does it have to have a use? Someone might have wanted to make one such thing because they found the geometry/crafts of it interesting and entertaining.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

Strictly speaking, it doesn't. But this isn't a "one of" thing, numerous examples of them have been found throughout Europe. It's been awhile since I've read about them, but in some instances, they've been found in situations that imply they had some kind of special value or significance to their owners.

And at the end of the day "use" is pretty open ended. Even if they were considered art pieces, made while training to build other things, some unknown religious decoration, or just a status symbol -- that's all still a use.

[–] Marduk73 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

multifaceted cock rings

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Lucky Romans. They did quite well for themselves girthwise.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There are larger girths to be found in the animal kingdom. Those Romans could get wild.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

I’m curious where Swans fall on that spectrum?

[–] xmunk 3 points 6 months ago

Those Romans... they knew how to party.

load more comments