this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
565 points (98.8% liked)

News

22612 readers
5231 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Prosecutors from the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office accused Trump of violating the gag order numerous times since it went into effect.

The judge presiding over Donald Trump’s hush money case on Tuesday held the former president in criminal contempt over a series of posts on Truth Social that he said violated a gag order barring any attacks on jurors and witnesses.

Judge Juan Merchan ruled Trump in contempt for nine violations of his gag order, with a fine of $1,000 for each instance. The order prohibits the former president from "making or directing others to make public statements about known or reasonably foreseeable witnesses concerning their potential participation in the investigation or in this criminal proceeding," and "public statements about any prospective juror or any juror."

Merchan had indicated on April 23 that he was not impressed by the arguments from the defense, telling one of Trump's attorneys that he was “losing all credibility” when he suggested that Trump was exercising caution to comply with the gag order.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 185 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Put. Him. In. A. Holding. Cell.

[–] [email protected] 108 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Fill. The. Holding. Cell. With. Wasps.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheMightyCanuck 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Then. Set. It. All. On. Fire.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Honestly?

The wasps deserve better.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago

In a hole preferably

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 111 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So he's going to jail right? Held in jail until his next trial date, like what normally happens to people held in contempt?

[–] [email protected] 73 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Next time, we totally mean it this time!

[–] [email protected] 49 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Stop, or I'll say stop again!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

I've written a strongly worded letter, don't make address this envelope!

[–] [email protected] 89 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 117 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

The maximum fine in NY for this is $1,000 per infraction. If it continues, the judge could sentence jail time but the fine would remain the same.

[–] [email protected] 117 points 3 months ago (5 children)

So it's basically designed for rich people to be to ignore?

[–] [email protected] 50 points 3 months ago

Sure is looking that way, isn't it?

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The judge addressed that concern specifically and said that when $1k isn't sufficient to cow a contemnor, detention should be imposed.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is key. If he jailed him right away, his attorneys would call for a mistrial saying the judge was biased against him and they would probably succeed in getting the trial thrown out. It would still go on with another judge, but when the tactic is delay, they win.

This is the first step towards jail for contempt. There can be no doubt Trump is maliciously violating the gag order.

That said, I have little doubt some 11th hour fuckery will happen to prevent him from being jailed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago

It's like handicap parking spots, it's basically just a super expensive reserved parking spot that every parking lot is legally required to have.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago

Yes.

Just like all the other laws.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And the judge acknowledged that point in his statement. Pointed out that other types of violations allow the guilty party's wealth to be taken into account, but this charge doesn't. Also pointed out that ignoring this sentence and doing future violations are mush more likely to lead to jail time.

.

Despite Trump's whining about everything being unfair to him, and the public saying this is a slap on the wrist, the judge is taking the legally appropriate and legally required steps.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Correct. Merchan is smart to stay by the book in order to prevent providing cause for Trump’s defense to claim mistrial. The prosecution recommended the maximum fine, which was honored. Merchan then set the grounds for possible jail time for future infractions.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes and no.

The amount is insignificant in the monetary sense, but shows the court can actually enforce a gag order. Hopefully further violations result in far more significant contempt punishments such as throwing his ass in jail, but it is a start.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (3 children)

It’s not enforcement if he can pay it with pocket change, it’s just a slight annoyance. Enforcement would be taking his means of breaking the gag order away (his access to social media).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 68 points 3 months ago (1 children)

FOR REALS this time, if you do it AGAIN, ~~there will be consequences~~ we'll tell you to stop again!

[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 months ago (7 children)

I know this is a popular thing to be angry about, but this time there was an actual fine. The consequences are being ratcheted up. The judge is just taking as much care as possible to make sure that all the "t"s are crossed and "i"s dotted along the way, otherwise he risks the whole trial being thrown out in the end. Look at some of the other high-profile "this rich guy's guilty as sin but got off anyway" cases, they often boil down to some screw-up that doesn't disprove the overall case but still invalidates the trial. Harvey Weinstein and Bill Cosby pop to mind.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (4 children)

A $9,000 fine is hardly a consequence for the rich.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 months ago

Yes, but as I explained, the judge is proceeding by steps up the ladder of consequences. The next time Trump violates a gag order he can now say "I have demonstrated that fines are insufficient, and so I'm moving on to jail time."

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

The judge is limited - $1000 per violation is the maximum that can be imposed.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Sadly, it's a limitation of the legal system. The judge even admitted in his ruling on this that he acknowledges that the monetary punishment is inadequate considering Donald Trump's wealth and status. He threatened jail time for future incidents.

The point is that as much as any sane person wants to see Trump behind bars, if you just skip straight to locking him up, he will use that as grounds for a mistrial. I'd rather see justice done slowly, him given every warning and every opportunity to correct his bad behavior. Yes, it's not fair that he gets treated with kid gloves time and time again while a street level drug dealer would just get held without bond, say nothing of what would happen if they were to be charged with criminal contempt, but without going through the whole process Trump will just use the temporary incarceration to paint himself as a victim of political persecution and pivot it to his advantage when he inevitably appeals the guilty verdict.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 3 months ago (1 children)

$1000 fine per incident? Can Trump wipe his diapers with a thousand dollar bill before giving it to the court? When will this asshat have real accountability?

[–] [email protected] 50 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Statutory maximum, he can't legally start with worse. He threatened jail for future contempt. And I hope he holds that promise!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 3 months ago (2 children)

$9,000? Fucking seriously?

[–] [email protected] 68 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Unfortunately, that is probably the statute. It sucks that we don't scale up fines based on wealth.

In Sweden (I think), speeding tickets are based on how much money you have. A person making $50k a year will pay a lower speeding ticket compared to a billionaire going the same speed.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 3 months ago (1 children)

As they say if the punishment is a fine it's aimed at the poor.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 3 months ago

And if a company does it, it is a business expense.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 months ago

@Bassman1805 @MicroWave New York law $1K per instance. I would guess this is a warning shot and if #djt keeps violating the gag order, we'll see #incarceration. #Merchan is being very careful and not giving any wiggle room for an appeal.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 months ago (3 children)

...for small change. This is not going to stop anything. It just gave his methods a (cheap) price tag.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago

It has to be reasonable and in line with practice. Trump is both like and unlike everyone else that's gone through that courtroom. You have to treat him with kid gloves, let him keep pulling on the rope, then hang him with FAFO consequences fully justified and above reproach.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 months ago (5 children)

From what I have read, conditions of his release from the other trials include not committing ANY crime. Criminal contempt triggers this and Judge Chutkin is the most likely to jail him. Now...odds on that ACTUALLY happening...

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago

That's an interesting thought. It will never happen, of course, but if she decides he violated the terms of his release she could remand him to jail until trial. If that happens, then all of the work Trump has done to delay his other trials until after the election would end up costing him big time.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (10 children)

I'm sure he's shaking in his boots.

Mostly because he's a fat worthless fuckstain, not because he's scared of a 9,000 dollar fine.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago

Not hush money. Election interference.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago

What a coincidence! I find him contemptible, too

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago

Even if they not going to jail him they should at least sequester him with no outside contact.

load more comments
view more: next ›