Natanael

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

More ambition, lol. The K9 Mail app now has backing by Mozilla

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Because certainly they don't think brigades harm communities if they won't trust mods to set subreddits as private

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

"we won't let moderators harm their communities by not letting them eg. protect their communities from brigades and similar harassment"

Sure you thought that through, reddit admins?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

Microsoft had a dual screen foldable like that, then stopped supporting it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Human involvement isn't the rule though. Again, that which ends up in fixed form has to carry expression by a human. Otherwise everything from dirt stains to footprints you accidentally create would be under copyright.

The prompts aren't generally considered enough because there's too little control over the final expression, the same prompt can create wildly different outputs.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (3 children)

The rule is already human expression in fixed form, of creative height. So you have to demonstrate that you the human made notable contributions to the final output.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

Using stuff like controlnet to manually influence how images are shaped by the ML engine might count, there's some great examples here (involving custom Qr codes)

https://medium.com/@ssmaameri/ai-generated-qr-codes-with-controlnet-huggingface-and-google-colab-a99ffeee2210

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago (15 children)

It's human expression that is protected by copyright. Creative height is the bar.

If you've done nothing but press a button there's often no copyright. Photography involves things like selection of motive, framing, etc. If you just photograph a motive which itself doesn't have copyright, then what you added through your choices is what you may have copyright of. Using another's scan of a public domain book might be considered fair use, for example (not much extra expression added by just scanning)

Independent creation is indeed a thing in copyright law. Multiple people photographing the same sunset won't infringe each other's copyright, at least not if you don't intentionally try to copy another's expression, like actively replicating their framing and edits and more.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 66 points 4 days ago

Ublock origin FTW

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (3 children)

LG had a partial rollable prototype before they stopped making phones

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago

Obsession with control, including control over future generations

view more: next ›